Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
Sell Us Your Item
For a $1.54 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 [Paperback]

Pauline Maier
4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (40 customer reviews)

List Price: $18.99
Price: $17.09 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $1.90 (10%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Tuesday, May 21? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $13.83  
Hardcover, Deckle Edge $19.96  
Paperback $17.09  
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged $34.79  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $35.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

June 7, 2011
CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title

Winner of the George Washington Book Prize

When the delegates left the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in September 1787, the new Constitution they had written was no more than a proposal. Elected conventions in at least nine of the thirteen states would have to ratify it before it could take effect. There was reason to doubt whether that would happen. The document we revere today as the foundation of our country’s laws, the cornerstone of our legal system, was hotly disputed at the time. Some Americans denounced the Constitution for threatening the liberty that Americans had won at great cost in the Revolutionary War. One group of fiercely patriotic opponents even burned the document in a raucous public demonstration on the Fourth of July.

In this splendid new history, Pauline Maier tells the dramatic story of the yearlong battle over ratification that brought such famous founders as Washington, Hamilton, Madison, Jay, and Henry together with less well-known Americans who sometimes eloquently and always passionately expressed their hopes and fears for their new country. Men argued in taverns and coffeehouses; women joined the debate in their parlors; broadsides and newspaper stories advocated various points of view and excoriated others. In small towns and counties across the country people read the document carefully and knew it well. Americans seized the opportunity to play a role in shaping the new nation. Then the ratifying conventions chosen by "We the People" scrutinized and debated the Constitution clause by clause.

Although many books have been written about the Constitutional Convention, this is the first major history of ratification. It draws on a vast new collection of documents and tells the story with masterful attention to detail in a dynamic narrative. Each state’s experience was different, and Maier gives each its due even as she focuses on the four critical states of Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, whose approval of the Constitution was crucial to its success.

The New Yorker Gilbert Livingston called his participation in the ratification convention the greatest transaction of his life. The hundreds of delegates to the ratifying conventions took their responsibility seriously, and their careful inspection of the Constitution can tell us much today about a document whose meaning continues to be subject to interpretation. Ratification is the story of the founding drama of our nation, superbly told in a history that transports readers back more than two centuries to reveal the convictions and aspirations on which our country was built.


Frequently Bought Together

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 + American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence
Price for both: $31.07

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

A notable historian of the early republic, Maier devoted a decade to studying the immense documentation of the ratification of the Constitution. Scholars might approach her book’s footnotes first, but history fans who delve into her narrative will meet delegates to the state conventions whom most history books, absorbed with the Founders, have relegated to obscurity. Yet, prominent in their local counties and towns, they influenced a convention’s decision to accept or reject the Constitution. Their biographies and democratic credentials emerge in Maier’s accounts of their elections to a convention, the political attitudes they carried to the conclave, and their declamations from the floor. The latter expressed opponents’ objections to provisions of the Constitution, some of which seem anachronistic (election regulation raised hackles) and some of which are thoroughly contemporary (the power to tax individuals directly). Ripostes from proponents, the Federalists, animate the great detail Maier provides, as does her recounting how one state convention’s verdict affected another’s. Displaying the grudging grassroots blessing the Constitution originally received, Maier eruditely yet accessibly revives a neglected but critical passage in American history. --Gilbert Taylor --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Review

Ratification is a gripping and eye-opening read. Maier is a member of that rare breed of historians who write vividly and with a flair for depicting dramatic events.”

The Wall Street Journal

“Delightful and engrossing.”

—Richard Brookhiser, The New York Times Book Review



“Magisterial . . . it is unlikely that anyone will duplicate what Maier has done.”

—Gordon Wood, The New Republic


Product Details

  • Paperback: 608 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster (June 7, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0684868555
  • ISBN-13: 978-0684868554
  • Product Dimensions: 1.8 x 6.2 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (40 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #138,411 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
(40)
4.6 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
126 of 131 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Politics Of The Constitution -- 1788 October 24, 2010
Format:Hardcover
Until recently, there has been a dearth of books about the desperate political brawl to ratify the proposed US Constitution by the original thirteen colonies. There are many books about the creation of the document (think of the classic "Miracle At Philadephia" by Catherine Dinker Bowen in 1966) but precious little about the desperate fight among the thirteen states to pass it. Then, as now, there was debate among who advocate the primarcy of state's rights and those who favored a more centralized government after the debacle of the Articles of Confederation. The close affirmative votes in both Virginia (by a margin of 89-79) and New York (by a nail-biting vote of 30-27) showed that it could have gone either way.

Last year, Bruce Chatwick published "Triumvirate" about the efforts by James Madison, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton to coordinate the campaign to pass the Constitution. It is a shorter and more informal account of the same material covered by Pauline Maier in her 600+ page narrative entitled "Ratification." Both books focused upon the perilous passage by the big four states (Virginia, New York, Mass. and Pa.) while downplaying the role of the other nine states. Ms. Maier has a much more detailed account (with much smaller print type) with a larger focus upon the other major players than Chatwick's account. Both books are very readable with "Ratification" written in a more scholarly style. Regardless of which book the reader picks out, the story is compelling and dramatic.
Was this review helpful to you?
62 of 65 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars THE Great Debate - Then and Now November 21, 2010
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
I am only in the fourth chapter of this book (just as the public debate is heating up) but want to write this review, because 1) I can see the general form and substance of it so far, and (more importantly) 2) I get the feeling neither of the previous two reviewers have fully read it. (I say this because it is a long dense book but it was reviewed within a few days of publication, with neither review going into any details of the substance of the debates, nor how Maier distinctively presents them.)

I'll keep this short and simple for now and add an update when I finally finish.

What is so attractive about this book is how it purports to reveal a previously partially told story, one which we think is already complete and resolved, but is in fact still being debated today. Using extensive (all available) original sources, Maier turns her authoritative scholastic skills to perhaps the most important subject in our nation's history - the drafting and ratifying of our Constitution. For too long this has been an issue dominated by the (winning) Federalist protagonists - with scant or dismissive attention given to the (by implication disloyal, antagonist) "Antifederalists" (obviously not the name they chose for themselves), who ironically often took pseudonyms incorporating the name "federal", and were actually more federalist in really caring about a strong federation of states than the self-claimed "Federalists" were. The (centralizing) Federalist were unified mainly in wanting ratification to be a swift all or nothing proposal. The (decentralized) Antifederalist were anything but unified, which is why they lost.

One of the things I like about Maier's approach is that she doesn't obviously and overtly set up this dichotomy of ideologies and characters - as they (ideas and people) were apparently more complex and evolving in regard to this. It does become clear however that from the very beginning there were real and strong difference in people's vision for the new country. There was also an imminent need to 'make it work'. What resulted was a profoundly idealistic but practical and, yet also secretive, partisan and elitist, document pushed through without much faith or interest in the democratic process...

This is fascinating stuff! And it is perhaps even more important today as we look to move forward on a sound basis (needing to shore up our foundations), debating the same old issue of balance of powers between the government and the governed (expressed not just in the lopsided and formal arrangement of the separation of powers in the 'Three Branches of Government' - Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, but between the various States and the unified "Federal" government, and even more profoundly and directly between citizens and their elected & appointed officials and the hired bureaucrats (the 'hidden iceberg' part of the government) - how we actually express our individuality and exercise our power to check the collective realm by how we freely choose - think, speak, vote, rule on juries, shop and invest.)

Maier's writing style is dense and comprehensive, seeming authoritative to me (a nonacademic armchair historian), informed, thorough and balanced, yet also reading almost like a novel - a densely detailed, passionate and convoluted Russian novel.
Was this review helpful to you?
31 of 32 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A battle for ourselves December 9, 2010
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
We owe a huge debt of thanks to Professor Pauline Maier for taking the time to review the records of the various state ratifying conventions that led to approval of the U.S. Constitution. In college we read The Federalist Papers, and we talk about the constitutional debates (often from James Madison's notes), but we really do not focus upon the fact that what the men in Philadelphia did has nothing to do with what the various state conventions thought the constitution meant. From the beginning, the conventions were taken aback by the phrase "We the People," in the preamble, because of the significance it had for the creation of a government. Whether the people had such authority when the congress had authorized a mere tightening of the Articles of Confederation was not a foregone conclusion. It was clear that the Articles would not work. But, since the Articles often required unanimity, could something else be offered which did not? What impact would this new central government have on the economic or political well-being of a state. How would peculiar insitutions such as slavery be impacted. Is it necessary to have a list of protections from federal governmental action in the same way that many state constitutions had a bill of rights against the states? All of these questions are addressed by Professor Maier in a most approchable manner. Whether the reader is a scholar who reads the footnotes and makes additional personal commments; or, like me, someone who reads a lot of history and reviewed the footnotes for more detail, or for location of an interesting source; or, for many, who ignore the footnotes and just enjoy the book, this work is a pleasure. I have studied and written about Constitutional Law, in one way or another, for 37 years. It can be so dry that just the thought of picking up a text makes me thirsty. But, not so Professor Maier. I cannot honestly say that I had to stay up all night every night to finish the book. BUT, I can say that I kept wanting to find another stopping point, and another, until I realized it was so late I just had to stop if I was going to function the next day. This is virtually the only work of its kind. Professor Maier has filled an abyss in ratification material, and has made it fun to do so along the way.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Radification, The People Debate the Constitution
This book is every bit as enlightening as you'd expect. Very well written and captivating. I'd recommend it to all history students for further study of the constitution.
Published 5 days ago by KD
5.0 out of 5 stars Can't put it down!
Dr. Maier really brings the past alive in her book "Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Gato9
5.0 out of 5 stars Great service
The book arrived in great condition and was exactly as advertised. The provider was easy to work with. I would buy again.
Published 5 months ago by Edward A. Madsen
5.0 out of 5 stars Very well written, and very interesting.
Pauline Maier has written a wonderful narrative history of the constitutional ratification struggles of 1787-1788. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Adam Rackis
3.0 out of 5 stars Too Studious for Me
This is obviously a very well researched and scholorly book. Unfortunately, I thought it was going to be aimed more at the general public and found it to be more detailed and... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Lejeli
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent
This book was fully engrossing from the first page to the last. It is a very important story in our history, but one that is never told. Read more
Published 10 months ago by Max
5.0 out of 5 stars A worthy read for the advanced student of American history
If you're a history generalist, looking for a broad-based overview of the lives and times of our founding generation, this book will not satisfy, despite the prominence of several... Read more
Published 12 months ago by Jim McCabe
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellently researched and written, but...
I found her bizarre defense of Governor George Clinton puzzling. She paints him as some sort of man of the people saint, rather than one of the most self-serving and corrupt... Read more
Published 13 months ago by John Vaillancourt
5.0 out of 5 stars Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution
The author presents a very detailed overview of how the Constitution was eventually ratified by the individual thirteen states. The process was no "slam, dunk". Read more
Published 14 months ago by Walter Haug
5.0 out of 5 stars A Scholarly Masterwork
Ratification is a scholarly masterwork which tells the fairly unknown story of the ratification of the Constitution. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Marc Korman
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category