76 of 78 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Magnificent, Stunningly Original Achievement, June 3, 2007
For over half a century many people in the West have looked to the Eastern world for spiritual insights and practices. There are many reasons, but many, including the Swiss psychiatrist and philosopher Carl Jung, have suggested that it is difficult for Eastern practices to take root in the Western mind. Many of us have never been taught that there is a vigorous Western mystical and contemplative tradition that goes back thousands of years and existed even before the Christian era.
This book is about one of them.
Most of us would probably agree that there are many ways of knowing, the power of reason being but one of them.
Some books are to be understood by the use of this reasoning, by making sense of the data, the meaning and interpretations of the author. Others create images in the mind and stir the emotions. There is yet another group - and it is by far the smallest - that communicates at many levels, producing shifts and insights in the reader. You can enjoy Shakespeare for his masterful use of the English language, or for the ways in which his words suggest and conjure profound meanings. More than one person has found that Shakespeare has the power to transform and change them.
This is Peter Kingsley's third book about the ancient Greek philosophers Parmenides and Empedocles and it is most definitely in that third group. It is his belief that over the centuries rational philosophers have edited, distorted and corrupted their work by ignoring the non-dual mystical and shamanic origins of their insights. So what we have is a neat and tidy rationalism, rather than the profound and challenging works that would mark the beginning of a process of initiation.
Kingsley could have played it safe, and produced an academic treatise. Instead he decided to re-create the works of the philosophers as they were meant to be. So the book is mystical, subversive and passionate: it is an intense and direct appeal to the reader to enter a transformative path of initiation. It is a direct esoteric transmission of a teaching that has been largely forgotten or emasculated by later writers who only understood parts of it.
Most people, even those involved in spirituality, have been lead to believe that the only ways to achieve insight and enlightenment are through meditation, prayer or perhaps by using mind-altering drugs. But it was not always so, and we have many traditions that are alive and well today, in which the path of enlightenment and initiation involves challenges to the mind and the ego. Even one of the great sages of the last century, Sri Aurobindo, did not sit and meditate. His spiritual practice was writing. The whole of Kingsley's book is an invitation to awaken, and for the person who is ready, he provides the tools for doing so. Not through sitting and thinking, or through stilling the mind, but by trying to come to terms with what he has to say. And then will come the stilling of the mind and the understanding. It is rather like a huge kõan.
Kingsley overturns centuries of scholarship, and you quickly realize that he is trying to turn the reader inside out in the process. The philosopher Parmenides held that our rational sense of familiarity is an illusion that has to be challenged. Echoing him, Kingsley says near the beginning, "if you want to keep a grip on what you know, you will have to dismiss what I say." He translates the Greek word "Noein," not to mean "Thinking," but to mean a "whirlpool of subtleties," that implies a direct intuitive perception beyond the senses. The implication is that this direct perception allows us to the see beyond separation and duality to understand the Universe as it is, whole, interconnected and undivided.
Another piece of mind twisting comes in the section on Empedocles' two principles of Love and Strife. Kingsley proposes that Love traps the soul in matter, while Strife sets it free. This is similar to the Gnostic concept that love, pleasure and sex can make the soul forget its real identity by drawing it into incarnation. In Kingsley's interpretation these Greek philosophers believed that the development of witness consciousness: being able to watch the mind and its perceptions, is a step toward releasing the wisdom that has been waiting at the root of the world for more than two thousand years. This could have come straight out of any piece of Eastern teaching about non-duality, but he claims that it developed independently.
And what are the implications for this non-dual view? It is that in the end reality perceives itself through you. The notion of personal transcendence has to be re-framed: if all is One, then there is nowhere that we need to get to. The ultimate Reality lies within us, and the methods of these Greek philosophers were designed to awaken us to that realization. The trouble is that even after this extraordinary work of scholarship and insight, not all of their methods are available to us.
Reality is a large, thick and demanding book and not everyone will be ready for it. If you skim the surface, you will miss the point of it. Understanding the book and the treasures that it contains is an experiential rather than a rational process. But be warned that Reality requires stamina and perseverance if you want to go on the inner journey that it reveals.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
102 of 109 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A book worth buying in Hardcover, April 24, 2004
Peter Kingsley's book "Reality" is that rare kind of book that comes along every once in a while that will kick the legs out from under you and leave you precariously holding onto the thread of the reality that you once took for granted. But do not read it unless you are ready to live without the reassuring substance of the material world and the cozy little circle of thought that we in the West have built for ourselves, cutting off the otherwise disquieting pieces of our experience that cause us to question our surety that we have got it right.
Kingsley, who is a master philologist, takes us on a voyage to rediscover the man Parmenides and the man Empedocles -- not the abstract Pre-Socratic Greek philosophers of crusty old books, but the men who were more than just philosophers. They were participants in, and indeed prophets of, a sacred tradition -- a way of life -- that existed for hundreds of years, perhaps longer, and which, according to evidence presented by Kingsley, was shared across the known world, at that time. In short he presents the human sacred tradition that predated what we now call the "West" and the "East." And he presents it as a story that will sweep you along, if you are open to the truth about these men, and leave you gasping at the treasure that was stolen from us in our march to rationalism.
In the ontology of Parmeneides, uncontrived and elegantly expressed in his poem which Kingsley provides a more accurate, contextual, translation of, is a foundation that has tremendous ethical and practical implications for human society and what it means to live a human life. For over 2,000 years we have stubbornly refused to see the holes in the fabric of Western Materialism. And I think it is fair to say that nothing would survive a reanalysis that took into account reality as Parmeneides presents it to us. Kingsley shows us how this tradition, which Parmenides and Empedocles shared, is in fact the foundation upon which our Western intellectual tradition is built; a fact which has been successfully pushed into the background or glossed over -- until now.
Kingsley's work presents a fundamental challenge to the edifice of Western intellection as it strips the past of its convenient shrouds and lays bare an imperative to once again contemplate the Sacred in Philosophy and in our lives. It is not just the clarity that he brings to the works of Parmeneides and Empedocles that lends a powerful force to this "striping bare," but that he connects disparate cultures in a once-widespread, shared, sacred way of life that existed before the transistor and integrated circuit. But beware: Kingsley is not some latter-day prophet bringing the Good News to us here in the 21st Century. Rather, it is up to us to take what his scholarship offers and find our way forward. The work of Parmenides and Empedocles represent an esoteric tradition which requires committed study, but which provides us all that we need, now that Kingsley has given them back to us.
James Corrigan
An Introduction to Awareness
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
48 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Ancient Western non-dualism, September 20, 2005
This review is from: Reality (Paperback)
In "Reality", Peter Kingsley makes a convincing (at least to the philological layperson) case for the presence of a non-dual mystical teaching right at the inception of the tradition of Western rationalism. Written in a somewhat poetic style that demands and rewards slow reading, the beautifully printed and presented text gradually clears away what Kingsley sees as the multitude of interwoven misconceptions that have veiled a simple, precise, yet subtle meaning in the fragments that have come down to us of Parmenides and Empedocles. He also traces the echoes of traditions stemming from these two ancient philosophers down through later history (although this is not the main focus of the work).
One of the most amazing insights Kingsley offers is revealed in his reading of the central "practical" teaching given by Empedocles to his disciple in one of the Empedoclean fragments - the practice of "common sense". We are accustomed to thinking of this term in a somewhat Blimpish way. According to Kingsley, the practice of common sense was actually a way of "pointing" to that which, common to all the senses, both "perceives", and is, Reality; a teaching startlingly reminiscent of the teachings of non-dual Advaita.
(So startling is the similarity that one is tempted to wonder to what degree this book represents a kind of special pleading, which is why I give it only 4 stars. There's an ever-so-faint whiff of histrionics in this book that makes me ever so slightly suspicious. One would very much like this book to be true, but to what degree it represents a kind of sophisticated intellectual hokum that only experienced academics could see through, is a question only an experienced scholar could answer; unfortunately, that scholar would have to be as experienced in both philology and mysticism as Kingsley apparently is! Has Kingsley just made it all up, cobbled it together out of his own experiences and his readings of Eastern mystics, and read his conglomeration into those texts? It really doesn't seem so to me, but I'm in no position to judge.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No