Start reading Reclaiming History on the free Kindle Reading App or on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Enter a promotion code
or gift card

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy [Kindle Edition]

Vincent Bugliosi
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (338 customer reviews)

Digital List Price: $49.95 What's this?
Print List Price: $79.95
Kindle Price: $29.99
You Save: $49.96 (62%)

Free Kindle Reading App Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $29.99  
Hardcover $52.69  
Paperback --  
Audible Audio Edition, Abridged $29.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Audio, CD, Abridged, Audiobook --  
The Histories of Bill O'Reilly
Browse riveting nonfiction works by TV journalist and author Bill O'Reilly. Learn more

Book Description

For fifty years the truth about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has been obscured. This book releases us from a crippling distortion of American history.

At 1:00 p.m. on November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was pronounced dead, the victim of a sniper attack during his motorcade through Dallas. That may be the only fact generally agreed upon in the vast literature spawned by the assassination. National polls reveal that an overwhelming majority of Americans (75%) believe that there was a high-level conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald. Many even believe that Oswald was entirely innocent. In this continuously absorbing, powerful, ground-breaking book, Vincent Bugliosi shows how we have come to believe such lies about an event that changed the course of history.

The brilliant prosecutor of Charles Manson and the man who forged an iron-clad case of circumstantial guilt around O. J. Simpson in his best-selling Outrage Bugliosi is perhaps the only man in America capable of writing the definitive book on the Kennedy assassination. This is an achievement that has for years seemed beyond reach. No one imagined that such a book would ever be written: a single volume that once and for all resolves, beyond any reasonable doubt, every lingering question as to what happened in Dallas and who was responsible.

There have been hundreds of books about the assassination, but there has never been a book that covers the entire case, including addressing every piece of evidence and each and every conspiracy theory, and the facts, or alleged facts, on which they are based. In this monumental work, the author has raised scholarship on the assassination to a new and final level, one that far surpasses all other books on the subject. It adds resonance, depth, and closure to the admirable work of the Warren Commission.

Reclaiming History is a narrative compendium of fact, forensic evidence, reexamination of key witnesses, and common sense. Every detail and nuance is accounted for, every conspiracy theory revealed as a fraud on the American public. Bugliosi's irresistible logic, command of the evidence, and ability to draw startling inferences shed fresh light on this American nightmare. At last it all makes sense.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Bugliosi, best known as Charles Manson's prosecutor, spent more than 20 years writing this defense of the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the slaying of President Kennedy, but his obsession has produced a massive tome that's likely to overwhelm most readers. At times, the author seems determined to present every detail his researches revealed, even if it doesn't add to the overall picture (like a footnote on Elvis sightings). Further, while Bugliosi says even serious conspiracy theorists don't claim the FBI or Secret Service were involved, he devotes chapters to each. The book's structure—it's organized by subject, such as theories about the role of the FBI, the KGB or anti-Castro Cubans—leads to needless repetition, and, for an author who excoriates conspiracy theorists, charging them with carelessness and making wild accusations, Bugliosi is not always temperate in his language; for example, twice he makes the nonsensical claim that some Warren Commission critics "were screaming the word conspiracy before the fatal bullet had come to rest." His decision to devote twice as many pages to critiquing Oliver Stone's movie JFK as to his chapter on organized crime (identified by the chief counsel of the House Select Committee on Assassination as the likely conspirators) is a curious one, as is the choice to open the book with a dramatic re-creation of events surrounding the assassination rather than a straightforward chronology of the relevant facts. Moreover, Bugliosi does not always probe whether individuals who are the sole source for certain facts (for example, Oswald's widow, Marina) had any motive to lie. Bugliosi's voluminous endnotes are on an accompanying CD. Gerald Posner's 1993 Case Closed made most of the same points in a much more concise way. 32 pages of illus. (May)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From The New Yorker

This weighty book (its pages number sixteen hundred and twelve) claims to be the final word on the assassination of President Kennedy. It is as if Bugliosi, who prosecuted the Manson murders, intended to overwhelm with sheer, footnoted bulk. But in the way that others have "proved" conspiracies, Bugliosi "proves" yet again the guilt of Lee Harvey Oswald. He does this by reëxamining familiar evidence but also by dismissing preposterous theories, such as one that J. Edgar Hoover masterminded the murder to keep his job. Bugliosi steps less certainly in considering the work of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which, in 1978, concluded that J.F.K. was "probably" killed as the result of a plot. Citing a National Research Council study, Bugliosi brushes aside the committee’s acoustic evidence suggesting that four shots were fired in Dallas (a fourth shot would confirm a second gunman); he is uncomfortable with a subsequent analysis, by the British Forensic Science Society, which challenged the N.R.C. opinion. Mysteries are like that"
Copyright © 2007 Click here to subscribe to The New Yorker

Product Details

  • File Size: 3792 KB
  • Print Length: 1648 pages
  • Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company; 1st edition (May 17, 2007)
  • Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B002GKGBM8
  • Text-to-Speech: Not enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Enabled
  • Lending: Not Enabled
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #93,719 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
22 of 27 people found the following review helpful
I became a fan of Vincent Bugliosi's impossibly thorough, impossibly verbose way of writing and doing work by reading his books "Helter Skelter" and "Outrage: 5 Reasons Why OJ Simpson Got Away with Murder". I adored those books as though they were my Bible. And I developed enough faith in Bugliosi's integrity through reading several other reports and books by him to develop a little saying, "If Bugliosi says it is so, then it is so". When I learned that Bugliosi was a proponent of the no-conspiracy side of the assassination I began to have my doubts about the conspiracy ideas---I never once thought that Bugliosi would be wrong in his assertions, the man does not do anything lackluster, he must be as well-informed and thorough about any such possibilities. My opinion that Bugliosi had the right ideas about Oswald's involvement began to take on a more solid form when I read in his introduction that he prosecuted Oswald in a mock-trial in London that was as close to the real thing as Oswald would get to a real trial, the defense attorneys presented as many of the conspiracy theories as they could get away with, and Bugliosi blasted all of them out of the water. He convinced 12 jurors that Oswald was guilty, and he convinced the majority of them that he acted alone. One of the pivotal moments of the book was when he addressed Oliver Stone's film "JFK" and Jim Garrison's trial of Clay Shaw, he managed to shatter something, that I held incredibly dear to me, to pieces -- but he restored something much more. In an area where I thought we would never be able to find the truth, I now know the truth. Oswald did it. Oswald acted alone. Jack Ruby killed Oswald. Ruby acted alone. Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
140 of 191 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars 81 days... April 17, 2008
By nto62
81 days is what it took me to read this over-sized, tightly-spaced, mini-fonted, 1512-page, concrete slab of a book, though this duration was unevenly distributed. Bugliosi starts his book with an extremely suspenseful countdown to the death of JFK. Minute by minute, he presents a pulse-pounding, real-time narrative that easily overshadows the reader's foreknowledge of the tragic conclusion. Were the book to stop here, it's a homerun, 5-star effort. But, it doesn't. Not by a long shot.

Next, is a thorough and highly readable biography of Oswald that perfectly complements the prior assassination narrative. Indeed, at the conclusion of this section, I was fairly certain I had stumbled upon a real gem. However, Bugliosi's ultimate intent is to completely destroy a preponderance of conspiracy theories from the nuttiest to the least implausible, and soon the laity must hunker down for a long, and often tedious, sermon.

Further aggravating the slog is Bugliosi's habit of flippantly and frequently taunting the conspiracy theorists or "buffs" as he likes to call them. He possesses less humor than he thinks and despite his feelings for some of the more outlandish theorists, his playground antics detract from what he, himself, believes a serious piece of scholarship.

Things pick up momentarily when Bugliosi rightfully dismantles Oliver Stone's horribly inaccurate and intentionally misleading film, JFK. The more serious pro-conspiracy scholars, themselves, labeled JFK, the movie, a fantasy and Stone assuredly deserves everything Bugliosi hurls at him.

Bottom-line, however, is there is nothing the author can ultimately do to save what steadily becomes a lead weight in the reader's hands.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars March 14, 2015
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
If you've read Bugliosi's "Four Days in November," this is the full version. A must for your library.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
20 of 26 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Antidote to national insanity August 11, 2014
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
Given the widespread distrust in government that the JFK assassination conspiracy theories have fostered, and the fundamental danger (largely unrecognized) that such distrust poses, this may be the most important book of our time. Comments in the critical reviews here range from the absurdly pointless (‘Bugliosi’s book is too long’) to the shamelessly uninformed, misinformed, and boarderline insane. I’ve not found a single coherent argument against Bulgiosi’s book that withstands fact-checking and logic. Unlike many of the critical reviewers here, I read the entire book (though not the notes on the CD). Yes, it is long, as long as it needs to be. Will it serve as an effective antidote to the national JFK conspiracy theory psychosis? I am not optimistic. I think there are far too many people who passionately want to believe that there was a conspiracy of treason, betrayal, and assassination, at the highest levels of our government. As we see in the negative reviews and comments here, facts do not matter to such people.

I will share one example that I think is particularly illustrative. Very near the end of his book Bugliosi dedicates a long chapter to Jim Garrison’s dispicable prosecution of Clay Shaw and Oliver Stone’s movie on that subject. I have the movie and, after reading that chapter, I watched the movie again. I can but wholeheartedly agree with Bugliosi’s condemnation of Garrison and Stone. However, I wish to point out a quite specific example regarding Oliver Stone. At the end of the movie, just before the credits, there is a written notice claiming that, in 1979, (I paraphrase) ‘Richard Helms testified (admitted) that Clay Shaw was associated with the CIA’.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
1.0 out of 5 stars Useless Really......Not Even Worth 1 Star....
Pretty much just regurgitates all the old Warren Commision stuff that not only was challenged by real time wittnesses at the time of the investigation thathad information contrary... Read more
Published 6 days ago by K. Dimmick
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Published 6 days ago by robert howerin
1.0 out of 5 stars I recycle THESE PAGES ONE AT A TIME IN THE BATHROOM
We are on the third copy of this book at my house, we keep them in the bathroom and they have saved us a fortune in toilet paper and is a green as it repurposes Bugliosi's sincere... Read more
Published 11 days ago by mark rowland
Poorly written and long -- This author seems to be trying to milk every penny he can off of whatever fame he got for handling the Manson case. Read more
Published 15 days ago by Martha Williams
5.0 out of 5 stars What a great reference. Bugliosi covers every aspect of the...
Biggest book I have ever owned, but worth it. What a great reference. Bugliosi covers every aspect of the assassination.
Published 19 days ago by Terry M.
5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent book by a great researcher and writer
An excellent book by a great researcher and writer. It is worth more than its purchase price. It is past time to put an end to all the confusion regarding this matter, and Bugliosi... Read more
Published 1 month ago by W. F. B.
4.0 out of 5 stars A Respect For History
I actually read the entire book, over many months, and am not a "paid" promoter of the book or of the official version of the events. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Allan G. Johnson
1.0 out of 5 stars Bugliosi lets himself down
Shamefully ommisive. I have also read Helter Skelter and the OJ book...themselves far more credible and factually based. Read more
Published 2 months ago by Yankees
5.0 out of 5 stars Common sense not emotion
I have noticed there are 85 patrons who have given this a one star rating. These are probably the same who would argue against global warming, physics, evolution, etc. Read more
Published 2 months ago by Stephen G. Dewitt
4.0 out of 5 stars Superbly executed argument debunking the conspiracy-industrial complex...
I'll confess that I listened to the 15-CD audiobook version of this book, and found it so engrossing I listened to it again. Read more
Published 2 months ago by C. Pales
Search Customer Reviews
Search these reviews only

More About the Author

Vincent Bugliosi, prosecutor of Charles Manson, lives in Los Angeles, California. He is the author or co-author of many books, among them the #1 best-sellers Helter Skelter, And the Sea Will Tell, and Outrage; plus Four Days in November, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, No Island of Sanity, The Betrayal of America, Lullaby and Good Night, Shadow Of Cain, Till Death Us Do Part, Drugs in America, and The Phoenix Solution.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
Message From Author Patricia Lambert -- "David Lifton owes me an...
Mr. Von Pein:

Have you spoken to Stephen Darby lately? Do you have his phone number? Do you have the dossier which shows Nathan's work? The answer to all three for me is "yes." The answer for you is, most likely, no.
Nathan told Bugliosi that he matched a latent print of a left pink... Read More
Aug 22, 2007 by Richard Van Noord |  See all 1394 posts
Blunders Found in Bugliosi's Book to Date
The same way all government cover ups occur. How many people in government knew that when George H. W. Bush was comparing Saddham Hussein to Hitler because he used wmd's on his own people that the US actually not only knew about it when it happened but our government actually helped him locate... Read More
Nov 22, 2013 by jacnewman |  See all 21 posts
Bugliosi misrepresents the medical evidence
Pat Speer wrote "There is absolutely no reason to believe anyone attempting to kill Walker would kill Kennedy instead. Oswald undoubtedly knew the difference between Walker and Kennedy, even if the majority of todays' single-assassin theorists are unable to understand this... Read More
Jul 25, 2007 by Patrick Collins |  See all 144 posts
How many people conspired?
Kevin, we could probably go back to school, study to become psychiatrists, and then perhaps be able to understand why so many people are glued to these unbelievable wacky horror/fairy tales. This one (the 27 people including Connally and Tippet and "Ozwald" lol) is in the running for... Read More
May 20, 2013 by Wolfmantim_2001 |  See all 8 posts
Bullet lead analysis and Bugliosi


An evaluation of the bullet-fragment evidence (the NAA tests done by
Dr. Guinn and subsequent NAA studies)......

There are 5 total bullet specimens in question here:

1.) CE399 (the stretcher bullet, positively from Oswald's rifle).

2.)... Read More
Feb 5, 2008 by David Von Pein |  See all 21 posts
HSCA Robert Blakely expresses his complete distrust of CIA Be the first to reply
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Look for Similar Items by Category