|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
1 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Faulty Logic,
By Daniel J. Knight "Hate evil, love good, maint... (Albuquerque, NM) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Reconstructed Chronology Of The Divided Kingdom (Hardcover)
The author strangely, chooses to ignore the accuracy of the Bible and favors the secular record. It's nonsensical because the Bible repeatedly shows its accuracy in all manner of ways. Why would then, a person show favor to a limited secular record? Regardless, the author whether she likes it or not, shows how accurate the Bible is, because although she fudges against the Bible taking away or adding a few years here and there, it is only a few years. Now compare how consistant secular scientists' dates for the age of the universe is using different dating methods, and it will differ by millions or billions of years. Clearly the Bible is more reliable then. It's sad that Christine refuses to see that.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
The Reconstructed Chronology Of The Divided Kingdom by M. Christine Tetley (Hardcover - October 1, 2004)
Used & New from: $39.95
| |
| ||
