From Publishers Weekly
In six lively essays, published previously in the Partisan Review and elsewhere, Shaw, a New York City-based critic, argues for the rescue of canonical American novels from the influence of politically correct university ideologues. Each chapter compares past and present trends in literary criticism in the appraisal of a major 19th-century novel; the novelists include Nathaniel Hawthorne ( The Scarlet Letter ), Mark Twain ( Huckleberry Finn ), Henry James ( The Bostonians ) and Herman Melville ( Moby Dick , Billy Budd , Typee ). Shaw posits that while earlier critics dealt primarily with these books as substantive and meaningful works of literature, critics since the 1960s, using evaluative interpretation, have reduced them to reflections of their own various political agendas. Among his examples of contemporary critical approaches are the reckoning of Hawthorne's character Hester Prynne as a feminist (Shaw particularly indicts feminist critics) and the alleged distortion of Melville's Billy Budd into an argument against the power of the state. Shaw's point of view is somewhat controversial but debate is necessary to the development of all thoughtful alternatives to some of the current theoretical trends.
Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Library Journal
Examining five famous texts from 19th-century American literature (Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter, Melville's Moby Dick and Billy Budd, Twain's Huckleberry Finn, and James's The Bostonians), Shaw, a literary critic himself, maintains that in the last 25 years, critics have tended to reduce these texts to political tracts at the expense of their literary integrity. Works of literature essentially become social documents, frequently indicting the society of their authors. Some interpretations, Shaw insists, violate literary common sense: authors supposedly lose control of their materials. As a result, for example, we have Hawthorne unwittingly inviting us to view Hester Prynne as a victim of her morally repressive society. We can reclaim American literature by putting things in perspective, that is, by not ignoring the political implications of texts but not privileging them, either. Shaw's careful study raises important questions about the biases of recent trends in criticism of classic American literature. For informed readers and scholars.
R. David Kent, Lakeland College, Sheboygan, Wis.Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.