Customer Reviews

Red

5 star:		(13)
4 star:		(16)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(4)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

I can't comment on the DVD because I only saw the screener for this movie but that makes no difference, except if I wanted to judge the quality of the transfer in terms of video and audio fidelity.

Red made official selection for the Sundance Film Festival and deservedly so. Director Lucky McKee's telling of a man seeking justice for the murder of his dog is emotionally gripping yet ultimately satisfying in a Death Wish sort of way. The film works in terms of its directing and acting, which made me feel it's the best independent movie I've seen in a long time and possibly the best movie of 2008--period!

Robert Englund's performance, though short, was dead on. I think he's really come far as an actor. I found his portrayal of an unemployed carpenter, who happens to be the father of one of the three teens who shot Ludlow's dog, to be very convincing. He's matured as an actor and should do more roles outside of horror.

Tom Sizemore does a good job playing the evil father of the boy who shot the dog. He's your typical hunter-businessman who beats his wife and rules his household with authority. In other words, his morality is always at an all-time low.

Brian Cox, of course, stole the show with his role as the owner of Red. As a viewer, I felt convinced that he really lost his dog. In fact, so much so, that it got to the point where I wanted to jump into the television screen and help him get those suckers.

I will definitely own the DVD when it comes out. I can't imagine not adding this to my collection.

If you own a dog and think of it as being more than just a dog, perhaps more like a member of your family, you'll find this a difficult watch but bearable.

Those who are for animal rights in all forms will definitely find that your quota of vengeance will have been filled after seeing this poignant film.

Though many may argue the point, best-selling author Jack Ketchum (nom de plume of Dallas Mayr) is a writer of frightening horror novels. However, unlike high-profile genre authors like Stephen King, Peter Straub, Clive Barker, and Dean Koontz, Ketchum only occasionally writes about horrors that arise from fictional supernatural realms. More often than not, his novels focus on the horrors that arise from within the ranks of the human race, and the "monsters" in his novels, which are sometimes inspired by real people and actual events, can be the babysitter next door, privileged kids from a wealthy family, or an ex-girlfriend. After reading a Ketchum novel, one often comes away feeling as if there's some truth to the old adage that we humans are our own worst enemies.

The 2008 indie film RED, based on the Ketchum novel of the same name, tells the story of how Avery Ludlow, a small-town shopkeeper, seeks justice after a trio of rich kids shoot his beloved dog out of spite during an attempted robbery. Getting nowhere with the police, the boys' parents, or the media, Ludlow takes matters into his own hands and tries to extract a simple apology from the boys. Being people of privilege, the boys and the wealthy, influential father of two of them react as if they are above the law--which, in effect, they are--and instead of offering an apology, they do things that only compound the transgressions against Ludlow...with ultimately fatal consequences.

Although RED was co-directed by Lucky McKee, who is better known for his horror movies, the film treats the subject with much more realism and sensitivity than is found in the average horror fare. This is partly due to the excellent performances that McKee and his co-director, Trygve Allister Diesen, draw from their experienced cast. In the role of Ludlow, oft under-appreciated actor Brian Cox--who won accolades for playing audience favorite Dr. Hannibal Lecktor [sic] in Michael Mann's MANHUNTER (1986) long before Anthony Hopkins assumed the role in THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS (1991)--creates a complex, multi-layered character who simply wants his transgressors to understand the depth and repercussions of their senseless act. Playing Danny, the sociopathic leader of the privileged delinquents, Noel Fisher is truly frightening. And in supporting roles that cast them against their usual horror-show types, actors Robert Englund (Freddy Krueger in the A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET series) and Amanda Plummer (star of numerous horror and SF movies, among other things) are quite convincing as the incredulous but befuddled parents of one of the boys.

Another thing that raises RED above the standard revenge movie is the fact that, at the film's denouement, Avery Ludlow comes to question the ultimate value and morality of his own actions. Although the boys are clearly wrong in their transgressions against Ludlow and deserve to be punished, and in spite of the fact that Ludlow is undoubtedly entitled to some level of legal recompense, Ludlow nonetheless feels responsible for the fatalities that result from his seeking of justice. His self-doubt brings into question the nature of justice and whether or not genuine justice indeed exists, and the events of the film that lead Ludlow to his moment of doubt tend to emphasize the widening class and generational schisms in the U.S. and how legal justice is often applied differently based on certain demographics.

The DVD edition of RED presents the film in anamorphic widescreen, and the digital transfer is beautiful (which shouldn't be surprising, since the film itself was shot in HD digital video). The disc is short on extras, offering only a brief but interesting interview with star Brian Cox and a few deleted scenes. Still, RED is an intense, engaging film that contains some outstanding performances, and that alone makes the DVD worth amazon.com's price of admission.

I've read only two Jack Ketchum novels, the writer on who's book this film was adapted. Both were the Off novels which read like The Hills Have Eyes with brutality and suspense handed out in something that plays like a really good explotaiton horror piece. Ketchum's work has started being adapted a lot with the Off series next after this film, The Lost and The Girl Next Door. From Ketchum's work I'll admit that I never expected something like this though as its not a lurid piece and I found it a rather interesting spin on the idea of the revenge thriller.
Bear in mind that this film is not an Oldboy or Man on Fire. It begins with the main character Avery Ludlow being confronted by the three youths, Danny and Harold and their friend Pete. Danny a bully with a gun wanting to shoot something taunts Avery before shooting Red, Ludlows old dog. Ludlow angered by the shooting and wanting an apology goes to Danny's father Michael McCormack who taking the word of his son over the old man basically tells him off. But Avery wants whats right. He takes his problem to the law who can't do anything about the matter and tell him that Michael's Lawyers can keep Danny from facing any kind of punishment. He gets help from a journalist and soon Danny and Michael are both threatening violence. Soon backed into corner and harrassed Avery takes matters further inciting violence from the McCormacks despite Harold the younger bullied son who wants to do whats right.
I really liked this film far much more than I would. Theres a lot to be said from the simplicity of the direction to the characterization of the three main characters. Most of Ketchum's work I'd best describe as lurid but suprisingly the script from the writer of The Grudge remakes keeps things simple building things up like a slow burn letting the action intensify. It also helps I suppose with the actors involved. Tom Sizemore and Noel Fisher are fine as the villains who are more bullies who don't want to admit weakness to an old man. But this is Brian Cox's film in my opinion. Cox is one of the best living actors in my opinion someone who its always a pleasure to watch be it in Super Troopers or Manhunter-where his performance as Hannibal Lector trounces Anthony Hopkins easily. Here he presents an earnest old man who doesn't want the violence that happens but won't let the McCormacks have their way. Its one of the better performances of its kind nicely dialed down but still capable of anger. I'll say one thing though. Theres a monologue delivered by Cox in the middle of the film which to me was one of the best moments of any film this year. Its a quiet moment where He delivers a small speech about his family that doesn't revert to flashback but quietly explores his modest home ending on his face as He relates a tragedy that befell him. Its a great scene earnestly directed and fits with the end as Avery admits the absurdity of the situation.
I enjoyed the film greatly but there was a lack of features that made the disc somewhat of a disappointment. I wanted to say that I highly regard the film but with the lack of features there was also a problem with severe combing in the image that was through the majority of the film which is why I only rated it a four. I'd say rent the film and wait for the price to drop if you like it. But do see the movie.

I heard about "Red" soon after it came out and decided then and there that I couldn't bring myself to watch it, no matter how good the reviews were. But it must have been fate, because I accidentally rented it tonight with the intention of seeing the new movie by the same name with Morgan Freeman, Bruce Willis, John Malkovich, et al.

I knew from past experience that Amazon would have cancelled the rental and reimbursed my fee, but I decided to go ahead and bite the bullet. I literally cringed when I pushed the play button because I knew what was coming! Thankfully I was alone, because ten minutes into it I was sobbing. If you've seen this and think I sound overly dramatic, then I can only assume that you've never experienced the love and companionship of an animal ... or the crushing loss when they move on.

I'm glad I finally watched this, and I think it's good to let down your guard and allow a story to be told no matter how painful it is to take in. It's an outstanding film with a cast of excellent actors who I believe deserve a lot more recognition than many of them have been given. I recognized most of them from their strong "supporting" roles in blockbuster hits - with the exception of Robert Englund - because he's been hidden behind the mask of Freddie Krueger so many times!

I have no doubt I'll watch this again, just as I've re-read books and seen movies multiple times which moved me so deeply that I'm willing to experience despair in order to relive the impact the story had on me. Many times a story is most effectively communicated through brutal honesty and raw emotion.

P.S. I ended up renting both movies, and I recommend "Red" (2010) if you're in the mood for an enjoyable action/adventure with practically an all-star cast!

The main issue of this film is HOW to instill some moral center in one's children so they will become honest, responsible adults. RED presents us with the problem and shows us two wrong answers--and also has the main character, Avery (played by Brian Cox), tell us about a third example of failure: his own, with his own older son.

RED isn't a film designed to "entertain" us viewers; instead, it is carefully organized to make us think about a serious, real-life matter--and then it leaves it up to us to reach our own conclusions. By NOT providing us with any "official solution," the film deliberately creates a kind of "thought vacuum" in our minds that we want to fill with the best answers we can.

As everyone probably knows already, the specific instances of antisocial behavior here are (1) the attempted robbery of an old man by a spoiled teenage boy with a shotgun and (2) the gratuitous killing of that man's old dog. When the old man attempts to get "justice" (a simple apology from the teenager who pulled the trigger would satisfy him), he runs into an array of obstacles of all sorts. And then "things" get much worse. And even worse--until two people are badly wounded, and two more are dead.

And then Avery, the old man, does some soul-searching. And a brief, happier scene is presented as the ending.

Yes, the issue is important, and this film can be used as a basis for a serious family discussion. The "extra features" include intelligent comments by actor Brian Cox which are relevant to such a discussion. (They also include a few "deleted scenes" which most viewers will be glad WERE deleted.)

In my opinion, the script is quite good (deserving a strong "B+" grade); the acting is VERY uneven (deserving about a middling "B" grade); and the production values, especially the camera work, are rather weak and amateurish (deserving around a "C-" grade).

If these factors are weighted equally, the film would get a "B-"; but if you personally tend to put more emphasis on one or two of these factors, then you might move the overall final grade somewhat higher or lower than that.

As for me, I'm a grandparent in my 70s--I've already raised my kids. I know what my own parents did that worked for me and my kid sister, and I THINK I know what I occasionally did right as far as my own children are concerned. But I'll let the film have its way with you--and let YOU reach your own conclusions.

Directed by Trygve Allister Diesen, Lucky McKee. Running Time: 92 mins.
It is Sunday morning in this small town. Avery Ludlow is awoken by his trustworthy dog, Red. After feeding Red his breakfast in the doggy dish, it's time to go get some fish bait from Emma (Marcia Bennett) at the General Store, which he owns, and then do some fishing. Avery and his dog are relaxing at the lake. Avery has a keen sense of smell. He smells cologne. Coming through the woods to the lake are three bad teenage kids, Danny (Noel Fisher), Harold (Kyle Gallner) and Pete (Shiloh Fernandez). Danny talks with an attitude to Avery, but Avery remains calm. He tries to tell Danny that he shouldn't wear cologne in the woods if he's hunting. Danny wants to know how much money Avery has and points a rifle at him. After Danny continues to smart-off to Avery, he suddenly shoots 14-year old Red and goes off.
After Avery buries his dog, he does a little investigating and traces the rifle Danny used to a gun shop and finds out the residence of where Danny lives. After talking to the father (Tom Sizemore) first about the situation, Danny walks in the room and completely lies about having a gun, the clothes he wore hunting and shooting a dog. The father says to Avery he must have the wrong kids.
Avery goes to an attorney, Sam (Richard Riehle). Avery says it was attempted robbery. The attorney says he can't prove it. It's his word against theirs. It's just cruelty to animals. Sam tells him the Sheriff would of had to see the trigger pulled. Avery wants to fully prosecute the three boys for the crime and request 364 days in jail. The District Attorney won't go forward with the case. Avery wants justice.

Excellent performance by Brian Cox as "Avery". Don't know why he wasn't nominated for an Academy Award unless it was considered a smaller film in limited release.

Also in the cast: Robert Englund, Amanda Plummer.

Filmed in Westminster, Baltimore, Maryland. South Carolina. Fillmore, Piru, California.

Movie in English. Option of 5.1 Dolby Digital or 2.0 Dolby Digital. Option of subtitles in Spanish.

Special Features: Interview with Brian Cox. 7 deleted scenes.

Note: Brian Cox is also in a different film titled, RED, to be released October 15, 2010. With Bruce Willis, Helen Mirren, Richard Dreyfuss, Julian McMahon, Ernest Borgnine. Directed by Robert Schwentke.

Brian Cox also appeared in "Red Fox" tv miniseries (1991), an episode of "Red Dwarf" in 1997, and the motion picture, Red Eye (Full Screen Edition) (2005).

Love the characters, the plot, the pace. Well done.

I have to write more to post, so I'll just say this: at least you should rent it.

I actually avoided this film for some time for two reasons-A) I loved the book, and I was afraid of it being messed with, and B) I can't stand Lucky McKee.
I must say that I'm awfully glad I watched it finally, as I thought it was great. What really sold me was Brian Cox, who I thought did a wonderful job. I've always liked him, and this showed he can really carry a movie himself. In fact, watching this I was reminded of an idea I had years ago(though admittedly not an original one) of an awards show that would give film awards to those films the Academy pays no attention to come Oscar time.
Anyway, I'm not gonna rehash the plot here, but I'll say that this movie stuck to the book very well, and it really had no reason not to as the book was rather straightforward. One of Ketchum's tamer books actually. But tamer certainly doesn't mean wimpy or uninteresting, mind you!
This is a movie that pisses you off, and by that I mean that you're so on Avery's side that you can feel his frustration and you almost clench your fists in anger at the fact that nothing seems to be done about Avery's situation. And lets not forget Sizemore and his son, who are weaselly jagoffs who know they've done wrong but simply do not care.
You're hoping that Avery goes into full on Bronson mode and makes mincemeat out of everyone who stands in his path to justice, but this isn't a vigilante action film. Though a situation like the one in this movie can only seemingly end in violence, it's kept on a more realistic level, and that packs more of an emotional punch. After all this is more or less a drama.
Very good movie, and I'm glad I watched it. I guess I'll have to give McKee his due!

RED stars Brian Cox (MANHUNTER, THE RING, ZODIAC) as Avery, a man out for justice after a trio of young punks shoots his dog. Avery tries every legal way at first, without success. He approaches the parents, which only makes matters worse. Avery finds himself up against a father (Tom Sizemore) who not only doesn't care, but seems to be the reason that his son is so unrepentantly violent. Things escalate, eventually leading to a deadly conclusion. RED is a superior drama w/ social commentary on age, class, and parental influences. Well worth owning...

It is an enjoyable movie. Not Academy Awards material, but good. Shows how far a person will go to get justice, the results maybe being too much.