Most Helpful Customer Reviews
35 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Better than average sci-fi fare, May 9, 2008
Red Planet has flaws (many of the plot twists are fairly predictable, some of the science is screwy), but overall is a pretty good value pick. Kilmer's wise-cracking "space janitor" is a character we can care about, Sizemore provides good counterpoint, and Moss is an eyeful. The problem-solving aspects of the plot lift it above the morass of most sci-fi; the characters actually use math and old Mars probes to try and save themselves, and ANY movie that features realistic, scientific approaches to solving problems is OK in my book. I teach science in a public high school, and actually use some clips from the movie to illustrate problem solving. This is not high-art science fiction, but neither is it campy or schlocky; Red Planet has some intelligence and wit, which makes it pretty good in my book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Bashful's DVD Summary #002, January 1, 2004
Best: 1) Carrie-Anne Moss is great at tomboy-type action roles like this one and shines here. 2) They waste little time on unneeded character development and get right into the action. 3) The recreation of Mars' surface was realistic and spooky. 4) The bouncing ball landing craft scene was hilarious. 5) The overall Mars pre-colonization mission (and what they eventually discover with an algae experiment) is imaginative. 6) A high-tech robot runs amok and starts killing. I always love that (ha). Worst: 1) The narrative exposition and dialogue is often VERY dorky. 2) The special features included only deleted scenes. Recommendation: The going price is fair. If you're a science fiction and/or space TV series fan - get it. It has a high rewatch value.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
May be too simple and monochromatic for most SF fans., March 20, 2002
15 years from now, people are going to pick up this movie and wonder why so many people thought it was bad--there's actually very little wrong with it: memorable performances from Sizemore, Stamp and Kilmer, better science than the average Hollywood flick, a nifty mystery, a logical triumph of man over machine (aren't we all a little tired of omnipotent, indestructible robots?), and crisp suspense as the astronauts race the clock to escape the tightening noose of a mission gone awry. It was promoted as a SF/Horror flick similar to ALIEN, and it really isn't--it's more like Alfred Hitchcock directing THE RIGHT STUFF. All the SF movie fans I know tend to like byzantine tales, historic in scope, filled with quirky characters roaming rich new landscapes, so this simple tale of a small group of men trying to escape a desolate red planet within a short span of hours might not be rich enough for them. (The SF fanboys won't like it because Carrie-Anne Moss's shower scene is too short and doesn't show enough...er...Moss.) It's definitely worth a rental, but you won't want to own it unless you're a suspense fan that revels more in how a film is put together than in how it turns out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|