Red Rabbit (Jack Ryan) and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Kindle Edition
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Red Rabbit
 
 
Start reading Red Rabbit (Jack Ryan) on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Red Rabbit [Large Print] [Hardcover]

Tom Clancy (Author)
2.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (624 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.



Book Description

October 2002
Tom Clancy returns to Jack Ryan's early days, in an extraordinary novel of global political drama. Long before becoming President, Jack Ryan is a novice CIA Analyst. One of his first assignments is to debrief a high-level Soviet defector who tells an amazing tale of officials planning to assassinate Pope John Paul II. In the end, however, it will not just be the Pope's life, but the stability of the Western world that is at stake.
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

There's not a shot fired until page 602 in Clancy's lumbering new thriller, and readers up on their history will know the outcome of that shot on page 17. What comes in between is a slow-moving but, given Clancy's astonishing flair for fly-on-the-wall writing, steadily absorbing imagining of the back story behind Mehmet Ali Agca's (real-life) failed attempt on the life of Pope John II in 1981. By going back 21 years, Clancy provides a fresh adventure for a young Jack Ryan, but Ryan fans (and presumably Ben Affleck) may be surprised to learn that Ryan is, until the final scenes, only a supporting player here. The book's main heroes are the husband-and-wife team of Ed Foley, CIA station chief in Moscow, and his agent-wife, Mary Pat, and Oleg Zaitzev (code-named Rabbit), the mid-level employee in the KGB communications department who for conscience's sake decides to defect to America when he's asked to encrypt messages that reveal a plot, under the auspices of then-KGB chief Yuri Andropov, to kill the pope in response to the pontiff's secret letter threatening to resign the papacy and to return to Poland to resist Soviet domination. In real life, the pope wrote such a letter, and analysts have long speculated that the Soviets, via Bulgarian controllers, dispatched Agca to kill him. It's utterly fascinating to read Clancy's playing out of that likely scenario is there a writer in the world who brings so much verisimilitude to scenes both high (Politburo meetings) and low (details of spy craft and everyday Soviet life)? But while Clancy delivers a believable and encyclopedic version of real-life events, the suspense is minimal a disappointment when other writers (Forsyth in Day of the Jackal, for one) have shown that there can be enough tension in a fated-to-fail assassination plot to give a stroke to a yoga master.
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Library Journal

Clancy returns to Jack Ryan's first days in the CIA, when the fate of the free world hung in the balance as Ryan discovered a heinous plot to assassinate the Pope. Clancy is so big that this new novel merits a special limited edition (ISBN 0-399-14914-7. $150).
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 887 pages
  • Publisher: Thorndike Press (October 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0786240644
  • ISBN-13: 978-0786240647
  • Product Dimensions: 9.7 x 6.1 x 1.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (624 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,553,779 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Tom Clancy is America's, and the world's, favorite international thriller author. Starting with THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER, all thirteen of his previous books have hit #1 on the New York Times bestseller list. His books, THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER, PATRIOT GAMES, CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER and THE SUM OF ALL FEARS have been made into major motion pictures. He lives in Maryland where he is a co-owner of the Baltimore Orioles.

 

Customer Reviews

624 Reviews
5 star:
 (28)
4 star:
 (71)
3 star:
 (106)
2 star:
 (148)
1 star:
 (271)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.1 out of 5 stars (624 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

53 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Clancy keeps getting worse, June 8, 2004
By 
When I heard that Clancy wrote a book that was set back in the 80's Cold War era again I was hopeful that he could regain some of his earlier writing success. Not that I was hopeful for his well-being, but more that he would start writing books that were as enjoyable as the ones he wrote early in his career (Red Storm Rising, Patriot Games, Hunt for Red October, etc.). If Red Rabbit was an attempt at reliving the early years then he failed miserably.

Red Rabbit focuses on the spy game that was so prevalent during the Cold War 80's between the Soviets and the British/Americans. Attempting to relieve political pressure from the Pope and remind Poland who's boss, the Soviets decide to assassinate the Pope. Having read previous Clancy books I assumed that this was the catalyst and that the plot would promptly fill in around it. That was my first mistake (and possibly Clancy's too). Instead of moving on with the details of the assassination and the West's attempt to prevent it, the story completely switches gears, now attempting to highlight an unremarkable character in KGB agent Oleg Zaitzev that has an attack of conscience and decides to defect with his family and some very sensitive information. On a sidenote, how can Clancy possibily expect the reader to believe in the shear coincidence of Zaitzev arbitrarily choosing a person on the subway to help with his defection because the guy looked like an American, when in fact he's actually chosen the CIA chief of station in Moscow. Lucky guess, right?

My second mistake was assuming that the story would right itself and get back on track with what seemed to be more interesting, the prevention of the assassination. Instead the pace of the books slows considerably while the focus has shifted to the defector. Plans are made by the CIA and SIS to help him defect and then the plan is executed. What's the problem, you ask? We appear to be missing an antagonist. At one point the defecting family is attending a classical concert in Budapest which had been hyped up earlier in the book as though it was going to be a focal point of the story, perhaps even the setting for the climax. Wrong again. The reader gets the impression that a climax is near when the story starts jumping around frequently from Ryan to Zaitzev to the CIA in Washington, etc. Unfortunately, nothing ever comes of this, namely because the KGB isn't chasing Zaitzev, and it makes you wonder why Clancy just wasted 50 pages on this concert. This story suffered from an extremely feeble plot with little or no climax in the end.

Aside from a weak plot, the book has some other major flaws, one of which is new to Clancy, some of which are not. The new one (of which I don't recall this in his earlier novels) is his remarkable redundancies. From vocabulary to concepts, and character quirks to character titles, Clancy seems to forget that he's already used a particular word (i.e. capacious or ignominy) where even the most common word would have worked in its stead (i.e. spacious or disgrace). Then you have his seemingly unending references to Jack Ryan as a former Marine. Ryan reflects on it often himself, but it became just plain overkill when every time the scene shifted to the boys back at the CIA (they were naturally talking about Jack Ryan every time as though the CIA didn't have any more pressing issues) they'd have to justify his position in the CIA by referring to his stint in the Marine Corps (apparently all Marines are fit for the CIA). Okay, we know he was a Marine, now let's try focusing on a plot. Then you've got "Sir John" and "Lady Ryan". The couple, knighted in the novel "Patriot Games", routinely refer to each other by these titles even though they constantly claim to some sort of aversion to them. While addressing Ed Foley, Clancy will arbitrarily refer to him as "Chief of Station, Moscow," in the middle of a paragraph as though you may have forgotten his position. And how many times does he need to reassure us that Cathy Ryan won't have a glass of wine the night before she's due in surgery or that Jack Ryan doesn't like to fly?

By far the largest fault of this book and the reason it will never measure up to his earlier work, is his nonstop bragging about his characters. Where character or plot development could be taking place, Clancy chooses to continue with lengthy descriptions of his characters personal lives and undying love for their spouses, etc. And when I say character development, I don't mean further developing the same old tired characters that he should have retired 15 years ago, I mean he should be introducing new characters. Clancy boasts about his characters throughout the novel as though they were his own children and he's constantly touting their resume as though someone might question the reputations of these fictionally flawless people. His overuse of Jack Ryan has reached a new high in this novel. Throughout the book, the scene was continually switching between the Foleys in Moscow, the CIA in Washington, and the Ryan family in London. After about 350 pages I started to notice that Jack Ryan served no purpose whatsoever, yet Clancy kept including him and his wife as though their input was relevant to something. Eventually you realize that he is going to be used, even though it feels like it is being completely forced in poor literary fashion, just to keep Jack included in the novel. But if his relevance doesn't begin until page 400, then it makes you wonder why Clancy wasted so much text early on. Parental pride? It gives the story a ham-handed predictability that segregates this book from his earlier, successful novels.

I used to enjoy Clancy novels and I had high hopes that Red Rabbit might take on the appearance of his previous spy thrillers, but it is merely a 600+ page attempt at conveying a lackluster story that could have been told in 250 pages and even then would have been mediocre.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


65 of 74 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Save some time and just read this, September 9, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Red Rabbit (Hardcover)
Save some time and just read this:

While sleeping the sleep of the just he looked at his wife, the eye cutter, and asked himself, "How many divisions does the Pope have?" which made him realize that little girls give the best hugs. Suddenly he recalled that the KGB had roasted a traitor alive and made a film of it so he decided to buy some Starbucks stock before it was available. Then the Pope didn't get killed.

Now read it again and again and again.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


35 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Wait for the paperback., September 10, 2002
By 
Mick Houlahan (Chicago, IL USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Red Rabbit (Hardcover)
Well, it was bound to happen sooner or later - after the disappointing _The Bear and the Dragon_, Clancy has sunk even lower with the bizarrely flawed _Red Rabbit_. Clancy's shortcomings (cardboard characters, unconvincing dialogue, trite political preaching) have always been acceptable in the face of his terrific plotting and edge-of-your-seat action sequences. Not this time. The story moves along at a slow pace, there is little to no action, and Clancy barely even provides conflict. Instead, he annoys the reader with repetitive pap.
Longtime Clancy readers will grow tired of being constantly reminded that Mary Pat Foley is a "cowboy", Caroline Ryan is a "doc", and that the thought of his wife slicing into someone's eyeball gives Jack Ryan the heebie-jeebies. Clancy has also decided that if he is to refer to a psychiatrist as a "shrink" (and he does it quite a lot), he must spell it "pshrink", so we'll know what he means.
The book overflows with anachronisms. Ryan apparently bought Starbucks stock a good eight years before the company was formed, mourned the loss of a football team that hadn't relocated yet, "thought outside the box" long before anybody else did, and coined the phrase, "been there, done that, got the t-shirt". All this in 1982.
I found myself annoyed with the Ryan family while reading this - their interaction seems even more shallow than usual in this book. Apparently, the estimable Dr. Caroline Ryan cannot understand that intelligence officers aren't supposed to discuss their work with their families. She comes off as a little bit silly sometimes - certainly not like a woman who can operate on eyeballs like few else in the world, play a dazzling if somewhat mechanical piano, deal seconds like a Las Vegas cardsharp, and charm heads of state while bringin' home the bacon and fryin' it up in the pan.
The plot revolves around a real historical event - the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul. Of course, we all know how that came out, and Clancy doesn't rewrite history here. Unfortunately he doesn't even make the event very exciting. I don't wish to provide a spoiler. Rest assured that Jack Ryan, in an extremely unlikely denouement, saves the Pope and the day.
I did enjoy parts of this book, particularly the Foley sections (a book about Ed and Mary Pat would be very welcome), and the Russian defector's story. The espionage passages were satisfyingly realistic and provided the only tension in the book.
I am a big Clancy fan, and up until now have eagerly purchased his books as soon as they were released (not those "Op Center" things, just the novels). The last two books have been disappointing enough to make me check the reviews before buying future Clancy offerings. _Red Rabbit_ is by no means a terrible book, it's just that one expects more of Clancy, especially now that he's a well-established author - or is the phrase "firmly entrenched"? I hope not.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence:
THE SCARY PART, Jack decided, was going to be driving. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
field spook, embassy canteen, spook business, message blank
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Mary Pat, Soviet Union, Sir Basil, New York, Sir John, Yuriy Vladimirovich, Comrade Chairman, Oleg Ivan'ch, Century House, Colonel Rozhdestvenskiy, The Centre, Station Chief, Bob Ritter, Marine Corps, Oleg Ivanovich, Second Chief Directorate, Comrade Colonel, State Security, Admiral Greer, World War, Fort Meade, Leonid Ilyich, General Secretary, Red Army, Westminster Bridge
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(34)
(64)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:









i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...