Buy New
  • List Price: $37.00
  • Save: $1.85 (5%)
Only 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Redating the New Testament: Paperback – October 31, 2000

ISBN-13: 978-1579105273 ISBN-10: 1579105270

Buy New
Price: $35.15
17 New from $31.99 19 Used from $15.98
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$31.99 $15.98
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

Frequently Bought Together

Redating the New Testament: + Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony
Price for both: $55.84

Buy the selected items together

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Wipf & Stock Pub (October 31, 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1579105270
  • ISBN-13: 978-1579105273
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.2 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (25 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,381,310 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

He concluded John was written before 70 AD, as well as James and the Didache.
A. Moore
Usually the most seemingly obvious conclusions were rejected simply because they contradicted some scholar's extremely convoluted assumptions.
Florida Dad
The early date of 68 A.D. makes Revelation a contemporary book of current events of the Church.
R. Benton Ruth

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

127 of 131 people found the following review helpful By E. T. Veal on April 8, 2000
Format: Hardcover
What a pity that this pathbreaking work is out of print while publishers flood the bookstores with fantasy-as-history in an unending stream.
Bishop Robinson, a theological modernist whose "Honest to God" made him controversial within the Anglican communion, began this book as what he labels "a theological joke": "I thought I would see how far one could get with the hypothesis that the whole of the New Testament was written before 70", the year in which the Roman army sacked and burned the Temple of Jerusalem. As it turned out, he got much further than he had ever expected, a journey made more impressive by his lack of any predisposition toward a "conservative" point of view.
His conclusion is that there is no compelling evidence - indeed, little evidence of any kind - that anything in the New Testament canon reflects knowledge of the Temple's destruction. Furthermore, other considerations point consistently toward early dates and away from the common assumption (a prejudice with a seriously circular foundation) that a majority of primitive Christian authors wrote in the very late First or early-to-middle Second Century under assumed names.
For want of data, absolute proof of Robinson's thesis is impossible, and the weight of his arguments varies - from overwhelming in the case of the Epistle to the Hebrews through powerful (the Gospels, Acts and the Epistles of John) to merely strong (the Pastoral Epistles, the non-Johannine Catholic Epistles and Revelation).
In a postscript, Robinson reconsiders the dates of several subapostolic works: The Clementine Epistles, the Shepherd of Hermas, the Epistle of Barnabas and the Didache, the accepted dates for which range from the 90's to the latter half of the Second Century.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
53 of 57 people found the following review helpful By A. Moore on September 15, 2005
Format: Paperback
Robinson (now deceased) was an Anglican bishop who published books that ruffled conservative feathers. He decided as a joke to try to prove that all the gospels were written before 70 AD, an idea then regarded as ridiculous.

The result was "Redating the New Testament" which showed why early dating is more logical. The book has become famous. Fads in biblical scholarship have come and gone and their works gather dust in libraries. But Robinson's book continues to impact.

Robinson's main argument is that all the gospels must have been written before 70 AD when the temple in Jerusalem was burned to the ground. And it is very, very strange that the destruction isn't mentioned. Why? Because the gospels repeatedly state that Jesus predicted that "not one stone would remain on another" of the temple (Mark 13:2, Luke 21:5, and Matthew 24:1). So then why didn't the evangelists try to score points by pointing out the destruction?

And even stranger: Jesus predicted in Matthew 24 that "this generation shall not pass away" until they saw the temple pulled down. Then, sure enough, 40 years (40 years = one generation for the ancient Jews) to the day the temple fell. Again, if the gospels were written after the temple's destruction, why didn't anyone mention it?

The temple was destroyed during a short, brutal war between the Jews and the Romans. The war left one million Jews dead, their country in ruins, and the temple burned to the ground. Few people today can grasp how shattering that would be to the Jews, and how significant for Christians. The entire theocracy of the Jews was extinguished. Gone were the Sadduccees. Burned along with the temple were all records proving lineage, and thus, the priesthood was destroyed.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
40 of 46 people found the following review helpful By Anne Rice on June 4, 2005
Format: Paperback
This man was brilliant, and his criticisms of Biblical scholarship are as fitting for today as they were when this book first saw print. His reasoning and his arguments are all highly persuasive. This and his book, The Priority of John, are of great importance to anyone undertaking serious study of the gospels or study of "the historical Jesus." He left me pretty well convinced by his ideas about the early date of the gospels, and I've read much since -- published after his death -- that supports his view.
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful By John Dekker on October 16, 2009
Format: Paperback
Robinson's basic thesis in this book is that all of the New Testament books can be dated to before 70 AD. In fact, he puts most of them at being much earlier than generally supposed: he concludes, for example, that the gospel of John went through several 'editions' between AD 40 and 65. In order to argue his position, Robinson discusses relevant scholarly contributions at great length, and examines the biblical data carefully.

Despite his somewhat conservative conclusions, (he generally rejects the assumption of pseudonymity in relation to New Testament writings), it is important to realise that Robinson has not changed his basic stance, and is still committed to critical methods. He takes issue, not with the critical apparatus, but with what he brilliantly describes as "the manifold tyranny of unexamined assumptions." This is one of the great contributions of this book: Robinson demonstrates clearly that unexamined assumptions lead to unwarranted conclusions. Robinson is not dogmatic about his findings, and most of his assertions are tentative, but his arguments are nevertheless quite convincing. By his own admission, the whole project started somewhat as a 'joke', but if that is the case, and if Robinson is correct in at least some of his assessments, then this book represents a most serendipitous stumbling on the truth.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?