Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights against Progressive Reform Hardcover – May 15, 2011
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
(Jack M. Balkin Yale Law School)
About the Author
If you’re the author, publisher, or rights holder of this book, let ACX help you produce the audiobook.Learn more.
Top Customer Reviews
In chapter 2, he lays out facts about the Lochner case itself that one never learns about in Con Law. Far from being a law to protect workers from oppresive employers, he demonstrates that the law overturned by Lochner was sponsored by the biggest employers in the baking sector in New York, to cut out competition from mom and pop and neighborhood bakeries, often owned by more recent immigrants than the established families that owned the large bakeries.
He locates the Lochner opinion in context of other state and federal opinions of the time, some of which fall to its left and others of which fall on the right along side it, and succinctly explains how the "substantive due process" label both fits, and doesn't fit, the underlying jurisprudence.
In chapter 7, he traces how Lochner went from being just another Supreme Court decision to the epithet it has now become, through prominent casebooks used in law school to Professor Tribe's treatise on the subject.
He traces the crippling of the doctrine of liberty of contract in chapter 6, and does a much better job in that single chapter than others have done in much longer works. He has single sentences that convey as much information as many law review articles.Read more ›
In Lochner v. New York, the Supreme Court famously invalidated a state law that limited the number of hours a day a baker could work. Perhaps unfairly, it is seen as the flagship case for the now much-reviled idea there is a liberty of contract right implicit in the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment. However, as Prof. Bernstein shows, Lochner was neither extraordinary nor unprecedented. He also paints a very different picture of the context surrounding the case than that typically given today. It was not a showdown between big business and workers. The large bakeries by and large supported the law because it hurt their small competitors more than them (the law was also heavily union-supported). I also found it interesting that this was an early example of a "test" case--small bakery owner Lochner, seen as a sympathetic plaintiff, coordinated his indictment for violating the law with an employee.
Prof. Bernstein organizes his book into eight plainly named chapters: The Rise of Liberty of Contract, The Lochner Case, Progressive Sociological Jurisprudence, Sex Discrimination and Liberty of Contract, Liberty of Contract and Segregation Laws, The Decline of Liberty of Contract, and the Rise of "Civil Liberties", Lochner in Modern Times, and Conclusion.
Prof. Bernstein buttresses his direct discussion of Lochner in the early chapters with ample context.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Great text! I read this for one of my courses, and I was initially skeptical about the Lochner decision. This book gives a great perspective to why Lochner was a historical case. Read morePublished 5 months ago by Chelsey
An original thinker's thoughts are always worth reviewing especially in a society deformed by ideologies like the "progressive" movement. Mr. Read morePublished on June 26, 2013 by Leon Dixon
On April 3, 2012, referring the upcoming Supreme Court opinion on Obamacare, President Obama said, "We have not seen a Court overturn a law that was passed by Congress on a... Read morePublished on September 8, 2012 by Noforceofnature
In this concise, stimulating, carefully-researched and readible book, Bernstein puts Lochner into its proper historical context. Read morePublished on April 14, 2012 by David T. Beito
The author, a law professor, contends that there is a need to challenge the conventional wisdom about the origin, meaning and significance of the Supreme Court's liberty of... Read morePublished on December 23, 2011 by E. Jaksetic