9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
...good insight into why western technology is western..., February 15, 1998
I suppose most people like me have wondered why technology has advanced so rapidly in western societies but so little in, say, India or in Africa. I first noticed this through the work of Joseph Needham. I went to an excellent lecture of his with the unforgettable title "The Pre-Natal History of the Steam Engine". The Chinese had many of the precursors to the steam engine but didn't put them together. I've seen this rise of western technology attributed to Christianity in western cultures but never in a very convincing way. David Noble has convinced me. In the first part of the book he shows the explicit influence of two passages in the Bible, one from Genesis and one from Daniel. It is an academic style of writing. You've got to want to read it but its worth it. I wanted to know much more in depth about the role of the monasteries in developing technology. I found myself looking up the origin of Benedictine liqueur (from an apothecary in a monastery). When it comes to the present day the book is weak. He dwells on the religious views of current or recent scientists. Since most of the American population is theist and attends church its not surprising that scientists also espouse religious values. To make a great point out of this is redundant. After reading this book I wanted to go further but was disappointed to have my appetite so whetted but not yet satisfied. Chris.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
People are giving this book less credit than it deserves...., December 11, 2000
This review is from: The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention (Paperback)
This is a good book and a bit of a fun read though in its nature-- in what it tries to be-- it alienates itself from whatever group is intended to be its core audience. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile and well-written; though I gather than some, from its reviews, have had some problems with its difficulty and subject matter.
This is meant, I think, to be a popular book rather than an academic text. The author has his story-line and sticks too it fairly well: as with any 'popular' book, if you dig from one discipline into its minutia, you're going to find flaws and biases. Books can be great still. Because it is a popular book dealing with more or less of an arcane area, it does have a tendency to ramble between lots of stuff that most people generally haven't heard of: if you sit back and let the whole picture come into focus, I have found, in the end, you're still left with a worthwhile read.
To the reviewer who said that this book only focused on the development of technology and its interplay with religion in the West: it could be argued that only in the West could the author's thesis be proved: religious devotion was a cause of technolgical development and not vice-versa (i.e. religion/religious groups reacted to technology in the form of change in doctrine, practice, etc.: like the development of the different 'modern' branches of Judaism in the nineteenth century OR changes in Islam toward fundamentalist, anti-Western belief caused partially by technology... I can't think of any better non-Western examples...)
This is a worthwhile read; I'm pretty sure that its worth the fifteen dollars or whatever it costs. Buy it if you're in the mood for a challenging, good read on this sort of subject matter....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Let the Reader Beware and be Aware, June 22, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention (Paperback)
This book was recommended to me by a friend, who is a clinical psychologist. As soon as I began reading it, I felt very strongly that I would not be able to accurately evaluate it without input from people knowlegeable in science and technology and, perhaps more ominously, I did not want to continue reading it without access to this perspective.
I asked my book group to read and discuss this work. The group consists of three research chemists, one chemical/technological lawyer, two teachers, and one artist. The resulting discussion revealed flaws in Noble's narrative which I believe non-scientifically oriented readers should be aware of.
All readers in my group agreed that the book was hard to follow unless one came to it bringing some background information to the chapter topics. One of our group had worked in the Human Genome Project and knew some of the people discussed by the author, while another had some knowledge of the evolution of early Christianity. Both readers felt the author's bias in these areas.
On the whole, my group of readers felt that Noble wrote this book with a thesis to prove and was willing to extract, delete, and filter information out of context to support it. A propos of that, the scientifically-oriented members of the group were critical of Noble's lack of "scientific method" in approaching the topic he had chosen. They felt he ignored achievements of science motivated by humanitarian concerns and which achieved the desired results in favor of inflammatory scare tactics tending to overwhem and thus convince the non-scientific reader of the invidious presence of ignorance, compromise, and corruption.
As to the author's emphasis on religious beliefs as justification for scientific/technological pursuits, the scientific members of my reading group disputed Noble's characterization of scientists' motivation as essentially fundamentalist religious in nature. The practicing scientists concurred that their commitment to research came more from a stance of profound curiosity on the nature of things than the usurpation of God's creative work that Noble asserts as scientific motivation. This is not to say that these scientists did not have a sense of awe and extreme respect for what they might encounter in their research. Their statements were, for me, an antidote for the scary, cavalier attitude that Noble proffers in his book as being typical of today's scientific community. There are, albeit perhaps a minority, scientific/technogical people (or those in other fields) who do not pose a threat to the natural creative order of things.
Other criticisms were an annoying excess of shallow name and publication reference dropping, which I must sadly dismiss as typical of scholarship in the 1980s and 90s.
In conclusion, the feeling was that Noble could have done a much better job with his ideas than he did in this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
