From Library Journal
These two books address two of the early cases that mark the beginning of psychoanalysis. Anna O., initially treated with hypnosis in the 1880s, was written up in Josef Breuer and Sigmund Freud's Studies in Hysteria (1895). Freud published the Dora case in 1905, at the beginning of the psychoanalytic movement, and several authors have reconsidered this case since then. Both these books find Freud guilty of errors and worse: deliberate deception in presenting material to support his theory, misstatement of dates and sequences, and so on. Historian Borch-Jacobsen rightly emphasizes the power of suggestion, a given in hypnosis but supposedly minimized in psychoanalysis. He explores the Breuer-Freud relationship, their bitter separation, and the link to the "recovered memory" fad of today, concluding "what should we find but a false memory right at the heart of the modern myth of remembering." Mahony, a psychoanalyst, English professor, and author of Freud as a Writer (International Univ., 1981), studies the case of Dora as a narrative, with many enlightening examples from the original German. Unlike Borch-Jacobsen, he is not a debunker, though he seriously faults Freud for blatantly sexist mistreatment of Dora. Readers knowledgeable about psychoanalysis will appreciate Mahony's learned discourse; general readers can address the opening and closing chapters. Borch-Jacobsen presumes less familiarity with the subject and it has little respect for Freud, but he writes an effective expose that reads like a detective story. It sparkles with light and heat, and it has made an impact in France. Both books are valuable in the ongoing effort to understand how and why Freud became one of the great influences of our century.?E. James Lieberman, George Washington Univ. Sch. of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
This graceful and carefully researched deconstruction of the founding myth of psychoanalysis reads like a detective thriller...Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen provides an unsparing point-by-point comparison of Josef Breuer's 1882 case with Anna O. and the case history published 13 years later in 1895 of his celebrated patient. This book will appear alike to those interested in myths and legends, in the ways in which stories weave together to make history, in the rich sources of psychoanalysis in journals, letters, and case reports, and not least of all, in the treatment of women in therapy. --
Rachel T. Hare-Mustin, Haverford, PAHysteria's Notorious History
Borch-Jacobsen's Remembering Anna O. is an example of the new Freud Studies -scholarly academic explorations which for the most part come to bury psychoanalysis rather than praise it. -- The San Francisco Jung Institute Library Journal
In a closely argued and well-documented book, he demonstrates that almost everything beloved by psychoanalysts about the case of Anna O. is false...Remembering Anna O. takes the myth to pieces piont by point. -- Stuart Sutherland, University of Sussex
THESThis quasi-anonymity, no doubt the fruit of judicious appeal to medical professional confidentiality, produced the original fiction in the procession of case histories which were to entrance the readers of psycho-analytic literature. -- Canadian Review of Comparative Literature
Because of the book's scope and its correction of the factual record,
Remembering Anna O. is a valuable contribution to the small body of critical literature about her case. --
American Scientist...a groundbreaking new book... --
New York Review of BooksBorch-Jacobsen...maintains that the case is a myth and offers persuasive evidence in support of his heresy. His book is an entertaining exercise in irreverent detection, regardless of one's position on Freud. --
Atlantic Monthly[Borch-Jacobsen] writes an effective expose that reads like a detective story. It sparkles with light and heat... [It is] valuable in the ongoing effort to undetstand how and why Freud became one of the greatest influences of our century. --
Library Journal...groundbreaking new book. --
The New York ReviewThese are illuminating findings about the prehistory of psychoanalysis. -- John Gedo, University of Chicago
