Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
68 of 69 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
NOT a disturbing book,
By Sandra B. (Louisa, VA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Restoring the Goddess (Hardcover)
Ignore the Culver review. Walker does not destroy Christianity; she questions it from a woman's viewpoint. But if that's how he sees it, so what? Women are treated as property in the Bible. Christians believe original sin was caused by a woman. Without original sin, there's no need for a male messiah. Read the horrible things church "fathers" have said about women - they even debated whether women had souls. My statements are only a glimpse at Christianity's anti-woman stance. This book is emotionally satisfying. I would give it 5 stars, but it does not cite to primary or scholarly material and uses the questionable 9 million number for the witch hunts. The testimonials offer women's viewpoints. If some of them are less than kind to men, just read the Bible, read about violence against women - both in the Bible and in our current world and you'll understand why some women express anger toward men, Christianity, and patriarchy. I highly recommend this book as well as Sue Monk Kidd's Dance of the Dissident Daughter. Walker's book is a valid push for the notions that woman are people too and that the divine exists in feminine form. If the divine has been viewed as male, what's wrong with women viewing the divine as female? I don't need any man's stamp of historical approval to believe in the Goddess.
32 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Men of quality are comfortable with womens equality,
By
This review is from: Restoring the Goddess (Hardcover)
I am a male, and I found this book extremely interesting, from a historical and cultural perspective. The author believes that in ancient times, human culture was more respectful toward women, and this may be true, at least in some lands. Certainly, in intervening centuries, women have been treated as having far less worth than many animals, especially in lands ruled by patriarchal governments.I didn't interpret her book as a recommendation for atheism. Instead, Ms Walker offers a view of what the world would be like if, instead of an angry, vengeful Father God, our culture had instead a gentle, nurturing, Mother Goddess as its highest moral example. She does make a point that, statistically, atheists tend to be somewhat more law-abiding than the general population in the U.S., but she doesn't encourage everyone to become atheists. Rather she offers an alternative image of deity, in hopes that a kinder deity will serve to inspire kinder followers. She suggests, not a simple inversion of the patriarchal system, but rather a system in which the qualities of the Goddess are defined by what anyone can observe in the workings of the natural world, rather than simply made up by some self-proclaimed prophet (who may or may not agree with the writings of earlier prophets). In her system, society is not heirarchal, with power concentrated at the top, but cooperative, with power and responsibility shared. I thought that her view sounded like a better world in which to live than the one in which we find ourselves at present. It seems reasonable that, if people grew up in a culture where crime and violence were not viewed as entertainment, members would be far less likely to perpetrate such acts. And if children were trained, from infancy, that Earth was one aspect of the sacred Goddess, then in adulthood perhaps they would act as responsible stewards of the environment. Her book is extremely thoroughly researched, and I found I was reading it for a couple of hours each evening before going to bed. I hope to see this movement grow stronger over time, I'd like to be part of the world described.
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Part manifesto, part group therapy, part philosophy textbook,
This review is from: Restoring the Goddess (Hardcover)
I think that some Wiccans who bought this seemed disappointed that it wasn't a more practical work. I love this book specifically because it is a total exercise in thought. It examines where we may have been, where we know we've been, where we are and where we *could* go in human society.The book for the most part serves as an indictment of patriarchal society, and like any good manifesto, it tells why the proposed system is better. Unlike a manifesto, however, it doesn't get bogged down in the minutia and instead retains its philosophical focus. Yes, there are practical suggestions, but they are a side benefit to the overall thinking process going on. The group therapy part is the comments from "modern women" at the end of each chapter. They are all different shades of thought on the same subject, and no they don't all agree with each other. The other concept indicted is Christianity, and to some extent the other two religions that stem from the same root, Judaism and Islam. It is a very good, very thorough indictment of the many fallacies and inconsistencies in Christian thought, action and doctrine. Unlike Ronald L. Russell, who did not believe that the author was advocating atheism in any way, I believe that in a way Ms. Walker was in fact advocating a thealogy that is so radically different in its application and in how its followers view it that in a way it is atheism as we define it today. Rather than encouraging people to believe in a literal Goddess, she encourages people to view Her as a metaphor or a work of art that we use to recreate our society ourselves. She also emphatically encourages scientific discovery and thought, and criticizes irrationalism, epecially as it pertains to religion, many times. Ms. Walker recognizes the emotional needs that humans have concerning religion. She proposes that a Goddess system, which is about celebrating the truth of the cycles of our lives and the importance that women actually have in the biological and social structures of our species, would work better than the patriarchal "zero-sum game" that we are all living through now. In a very real way, Ms. Walker is proposing that we redefine what religion is, based on a more knowing, scientific and adult viewpoint than our forebears were capable of thousands of years ago. She theorizes -- and I think that she is right -- that if our mythology and the images, stories and art that we surround ourselves with reflect a more mature thinking process, a more rational thinking process, that in turn our societies will mature beyond their current state of near-constant crisis and inequality.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|