Industrial Deals Books Gift Guide Books Gift Guide Shop Men's Athletic Shoes Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon Adele egg_2015 All-New Amazon Fire TV Get Ready for the Winter Gifts Under $50 Amazon Gift Card Offer minions minions minions  Amazon Echo Starting at $84.99 Kindle Black Friday Deals TheGoodDinosaur Shop Now HTL

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Buy Used
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Book is in very good condition with minor wear to cover, tight binding.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty Hardcover – January 4, 2004

18 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
$13.82 $1.76

Between the World and Me
2015 National Book Awards - Nonfiction Winner
Get your copy of this year's National Book Award winner for nonfiction, "Between the World and Me" by Ta-Nehisi Coates. Hardcover | Kindle book | See more winners

Editorial Reviews


Winner of the 2005 Lysander Spooner Award for Advancing the Literature of Liberty, Laissez Faire Books

"A hopeful work--provocative, documented, resolute, reasoned, readable--delightfully devoid of legalistic obtuseness. It lights up a road back to limited government, albeit a steep road."--Willian H. Peterson, Washington Times

"This book is terrific in demonstrating the natural rights background to our Constitution and demonstrating that all rights cannot be listed in the Constitution. . . . [A]n excellent work."--Ronald Kahn, Law and Politics Book Review

From the Publisher

2005 Lysander Spooner Award for Advancing the Literature of Liberty, Laissez Faire Books --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Hero Quick Promo
Holiday Deals in Kindle Books
Save up to 85% on more than 1,000 Kindle Books. These deals are valid until November 30, 2015. Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press; 1st edition (January 4, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0691115850
  • ISBN-13: 978-0691115856
  • Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.5 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (18 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,434,288 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

92 of 100 people found the following review helpful By James J. Lippard on June 6, 2004
Format: Hardcover
Randy Barnett has written a fascinating and well-argued book. The book is composed of four parts: "Constitutional Legitimacy," "Constitutional Method," "Constitutional Limits," and "Constitutional Powers." The first part takes seriously Lysander Spooner's arguments in "No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority" that the Constitution is not and cannot be binding on people who did not explicitly consent to it- the "we the people" in the preamble is a fiction. Barnett argues for a view that a Constitution can be legitimate and binding in the absence of explicit consent only if it incorporates appropriate limitations on government to safeguard individual rights. This is the most philosophical section of the book, and I found it the weakest--while I think Barnett had good arguments against tacit or implied consent, I'm not sure his alternative really provides the legitimacy it purports to, nor am I particularly persuaded by his account of natural rights. (I am a strong proponent of individual rights, but I am unconvinced that they are grounded in nature, as opposed to being justified by a combination of empirical fact and subjective values.)
In Part 2, "Constitutional Method," Barnett argues that the Constitution is properly interpreted by a form of originalism based on original meaning, as opposed to original intent. He argues persuasively that the arguments against originalism which target original intent do not work against original meaning. I found this part much more persuasive than Part 1, and I think he has formulated a consistent and rational methodology of Constitutional interpretation that takes seriously what is written in the text.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
47 of 49 people found the following review helpful By Francois Krodel on June 2, 2004
Format: Hardcover
Like an grand old building that has been allowed to become run-down and dilapidated through neglect and abuse, the US Constitution of today is not the one meant by its authors. Randy Barnett, professor of law at Boston University, lays out a plan to salvage it in his latest book Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. He chronicles the Supreme Court's two hundred-year steady hollowing of the principles underpinning the US Constitution and then proceeds to build a case on how to salvage it.

James Madison believed, as did most Founding Fathers, that the foundation for a just and moral constitution lay in one based on the presumption of liberty. Man's dark side of exploiting and imposing his will on others was well known to the Founders. They incorporated constructs into the Constitution to impede special interests to act upon these impulses. Inevitably, there arose those who began to regard such safeguards as roadblocks to "desirable" results.

And the way to get those results is to delegitimate the Constitution's principles by viewing the document as a "living" one. Barnett strikes back in the first few chapters to build a novel case for a binding adherence to the founding principles of liberty. He argues that constitutional legitimacy cannot be grounded simply on the basis of the "consent of the governed": " one morally obligated to obey any law that is enacted according to constitutional procedures?" (p. 12). Furthermore, how can one bind a citizen to a constitution agreed to by neither himself nor his ancestors? The answer: ground the constitution in the moral force of natural rights.

The Founders viewed natural (liberty) rights as those inherent rights people held apart and beyond the reach of government.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
43 of 46 people found the following review helpful By Carl Bitzer on August 16, 2004
Format: Hardcover
For those who love liberty and want to be better informed about how our Supreme Court has eroded our liberties "Restoring the Lost Constitution" is a book you must read. Barnett, the author, is the Austin B. Fletcher Professor at the Boston University School of Law. In the Preface he recounts how as a student he was disturbed by what he learned in his Constitutional Law class. On the basis of that experience he decided to specialize in contract law where the practice of law was more rational. There he remained until he was tenured. He "came out of the closet" when quite by accident he was asked to give a short talk about a constitutional law issue -- a fascinating story in its own right.

Barnett brings his considerable knowledge and experience to bear on constitutional law in "Restoring the Lost Constitution." The first part of the book takes up the subject of constitutional legitimacy. Have you ever had an argument with someone who says, "I never signed onto the constitution, so I'm not bound by it?" Barnett takes that person's side and demolishes one counter argument after another. In reading his arguments I became more and more frustrated. I thought to myself what do I have to tell this guy? The constitution is in place; if you don't like it, make the most of it. But Barnett is much more gentle than that, in part I suppose, because he has an ace up his sleeve. He then figuratively turns to the person he was defending and asks a simple question. "What is the foundation for your belief that you are not bound in conscience to the constitution?" When I got to that point I said to myself, "Gotcha!!" Perhaps you can guess what the answer was and how Barnett uses it, but I am not going to spoil your fun by revealing it.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews