Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a dissapointing attempt to extend Girard's work,
By gabriel andrade (Maracaibo, ZULIA Venezuela) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Revelation, the Religions, and Violence (Paperback)
There is a great need among Girardian circles to come to terms with the problem of violence in non-Christian religion, specially after the attacks of Sept. 11th. Leo Lefebure attmpts to do this, but largely fails. The goal of this book is to analyze perspectives on violence in a multi-religious context. Lefebure claims he grabs on Girard's mimetic theory to do so. However, Girard's thought roughly covers 5 or 10% of the book. The book also has some basic problems in structure. Too much theoretic material a included, thus the ideas become disconnected from each other. The book jumps from Girard to Nicholas of Cusa to Buddhism without a smooth transition. Lefebure has an ambitiuos view; prior to this book, no one had attempted to extend Girard's thought to explore mimesis, sacrifice and revelation in a multi-religious context. But, because of its ambition, the book looses its central focus. Don't get me wrong, the book has some valuable information. I just had some very high expectations and felt dissapointed after reading it. A 'beached whale' would be good metaphor to describe it.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a dissapointing attempt to extend Girard's work,
By gabriel andrade (Maracaibo, ZULIA Venezuela) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Revelation, the Religions, and Violence (Paperback)
There is a great need among Girardian circles to come to terms with the problem of violence in non-Christian religion, specially after the attacks of Sept. 11th. Leo Lefebure attmpts to do this, but largely fails. The goal of this book is to analyze perspectives on violence in a multi-religious context. Lefebure claims he grabs on Girard's mimetic theory to do so. However, Girard's thought roughly covers 5 or 10% of the book. The book also has some basic problems in structure. Too much theoretic material a included, thus the ideas become disconnected from each other. The book jumps from Girard to Nicholas of Cusa to Buddhism without a smooth transition. Lefebure has an ambitiuos view; prior to this book, no one had attempted to extend Girard's thought to explore mimesis, sacrifice and revelation in a multi-religious context. But, because of its ambition, the book looses its central focus. Don't get me wrong, the book has some valuable information. I just had some very high expectations and felt dissapointed after reading it. A 'beached whale' would be good metaphor to describe it.
4 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Revelation, the Religions, and Violence,
By A Customer
This review is from: Revelation, the Religions, and Violence (Paperback)
I was very disappointed with the book. After the initial excitement of the promise to "extend" Girard's understanding of mimetic violence to a multireligious context, I soon realized the limitations of the author's understanding (or rather misunderstanding) of Girard's most important thesis-the uniqueness of the Gospels and the Triumph of the Cross. Girard's understanding is therefore gutted by the author's approach.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|