These 13 five star reviews sound suspect to me. Usually there are not this many reviewers (without an agenda) writing pseudo-"Top Ten Reasons Not to Read" lists, or using language like "packed into its 186 pages...," or using the author's full name so frequently, or adding so many hyperlinks. Maybe everyone is just applying what they've learned from the book. Just a comment, these sound a little suspicious. I'll be back in a few weeks when I've read more myself.