26 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
GIUILIANO THE BIGGEST HACK IN BEATLES LORE, June 21, 2006
This review is from: Revolver: The Secret History of the Beatles (Hardcover)
Every book this guy writes is mostly created in his head with no facts to back him up. He writes his own Amazon Reviews and I'm sure he's his own fact checker. He is poorly regarded by The Beatle community almost as much as Albert Goldman. Save your money and buy "Here, There and Everywhere : My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles" by Geoff Emerick. At least you'll read the truth.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Secret History?, August 24, 2006
This review is from: Revolver: The Secret History of the Beatles (Hardcover)
This book is very poorly written from a number of perspectives.
The timeline is atrocious. For example, you'll read about the death of Brian Epstein, then 50+ pages later he appears again in another section with no indication that the timeline has changed. This jumping is very frequent, and appears all over the book. Poorly organized.
Opinion is everywhere. The author feels the need to inject his commentary on the Beatles' behaviors. Of course, don't expect any analysis of WHY Lennon was so moody, or WHY McCartney was dominating, or why Starr and Harrison were resentful. Don't even expect to get enough information to let you make some of your own conclusions either.
Another key failing in this book is the way it quickly glosses over key events leaving you wanting to know more - just one example is the whole period during which they recorded Revolver - the very title of the book! Another example is when Ringo is quoted as not thinking Sgt Peppers was their best work. Well, why not and what was Ringo's favorite? Mr, Guiliano, you opened the door for us, so why not let us walk through?
On the other hand, there is FAR too much detail on their time with the Maharishi and the general workings of that organization. Enough already! I want to read about the Beatles, not some controversial religious figure! There's also a lot of tawdry details on the love affairs, drug use/abuse, drug busts, and other seedy aspects of their career that are pure tabloid fluff.
Unforgivable beyond all others, there are obvious factual errors everywhere. I've just finished reading Geoff Emerick's incredibly intriguing book and I can easily tell where Guiliano has either not done proper research or is simply inventing stories that will sound interesting. There are several contradictions.
Overall, this is written like a collection of articles from People magazine (or whatever they had back then), with no real substance or depth to the content. I'm sorry I spent the money on it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
A Grindstone for Mr. Giuliano's Axe, November 25, 2006
This review is from: Revolver: The Secret History of the Beatles (Hardcover)
Other reviewers on the US board have said it quite well - this book is nothing but a waste of money and time. Geoffrey Giuliano has fed off the Beatles' fame by digging up hearsay and inaccurate statements at best, malicious gossip and rumors at worst. George Harrison was no fan of Mr. Giuliano and I have no doubt the Messrs. Starkey and McCartney feel the same way. John Lennon did not suffer fools gladly and I have absolutely no doubt he would be disgusted with this work. This book is on a par with poorly written tabloid pieces. If you do decide to read this, check it out at your library or read it in your local bookstore and DON'T waste your good money on this. I am tired of Mr. Giuliano using the Beatles as a grindstone for his axe.
The Beatle Literati are extremely displeased with this book as well. Many Beatle Literati have read this so as to base an accurate opinion. My issues with this execrable work are as follows: the inconsistent time line; the nonlinear sequence in reporting; the subjective tone of the writing; relying on hearsay, e.g. "a friend of a friend said the following...;" the judgmental statements such as hostile John and controlling Paul. Horse manure! People are much more complex than this author would have his readers believe.
I agree with another reviewer on the US board who would rather read about the Beatles than the Marharishi! The overemphasis on the Fabs' sex lives is tiresome and tawdry; the tiresome dissertation on their drug use and busts is drawn out to the point of beating a dead horse.
This book lacks the research that so many others have provided, such as Andy Babiuk; Geoff Emrick; Joshua Greene; Pat Kinzer Mancuso; Alan Clayson and Ray Coleman, to name a few. Giuliano is notorious for his execrable hatchet jobs about the Beatles. Any man who would fake his own death as Mr. Giuliano did in 2001 would apparently stoop to any low level to hawk such tawdry trash.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No