A century before Stonewall and the rise of the modern gay and lesbian movement, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825-1895), lawyer, classical scholar, and openly gay man, was boldly and publicly defending the rights of homosexuals. Between 1864 and 1880, he published a series of twelve tracts, which he collectively titled "Research on the Riddle of Man-Manly Love". Much more than a seminal work on the causes of homosexuality, Ulrich's monumental study deeply influenced an entire generation of sex researchers, including Richard von Kraft-Ebing and Havelock Ellis. Now, for the first time, this pioneering work by an important researcher in gay studies is available in English in its entirety, newly translated by Michael A. Lombardi-Nash. Ulrichs surveys literary, historical, physiological, and other data in his argument that homosexuality is not a disease or a sin, but perfectly natural, and that the strict line of differentiation between men and women has been overemphasised. Turning to the science of embryology, Ulrichs contends that male, as well as female, homosexuality results from a crossing of the male and female generative principles during the first crucial stages of foetal development. Thus, homosexual men are essentially 'male' in body, 'female' in desire - crucially different from heterosexual men. Homosexuality (and, with that hermaphroditism and bisexuality) is the work of nature, hence innate and unavoidable.
Book Description
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Both volumes of this important book are well produced and deserve to be on the bookshelves of anyone seriously interested in male homosexuality and the history of sexuality." -- Sexual & Marital Therapy
Language Notes
Text: English (translation)
Original Language: German
Original Language: German
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
the first homosexual,
This review is from: The Riddle of "Man-Manly" Love: The Pioneering Work on Male Homosexuality (Hardcover)
It would be easy to fall into the trap of saying that Ulrichs invented homosexuality. He seems to have invented the idea of it as it evolved through the early stages of the homosexual civil rights movement, but it appears that a concept of homosexuality already existed in his day, and he merely expressed what so many were thinking and feeling. Unfortunately, he made much of the difference between what used to be known as inverts and perverts; he said that it was wrong to incarcerate born homosexuals, but it was OK to incarcerate men who were heterosexual but who were involved in homosexual behaviour, e.g., hustlers. This suggestion appears to us today to be outrageous. One should at least give him credit for having the guts to stand up in a convention of lawyers in the 1860s and speak in favor of decriminalization of sodomy. His theory of the basic effeminacy of gay men has had a bad effect of promotion of the stereotype of the fairy. The outlandish jargon in which he tried to categorize homosexuals of all sorts has not been transmitted to us. It would be easy enough to see his outlook as narrow and bizarre. It must be remembered that he had nobody at all preceding him in this field, he had only his feelings and a rudimentary gay subculture with no books or magazines on the subject. Kudos to Lombard-Nash for having the patience and dedication to translate all of this material for the first time without hope of producing a popular book.
5.0 out of 5 stars
An unparalleled pioneering work.,
This review is from: The Riddle of "Man-Manly" Love: The Pioneering Work on Male Homosexuality (Hardcover)
Every educated and serious gay person ought to read this work, although the price is enough to limit the sale of it to the few, and the few never heard of this book. Two comments only: the facts about the Duke of Devonshire were completely overlooked in the standard book on the Devonshires, and the vague reference to a popular English novelist with a failed marriage refers, not to Dickens, but to Bulwer-Lytton.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
