Qty:1
$179.99 + $10.55 shipping
In Stock. Sold by GolfBestBuy

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Rifle Project X 5.0 Flighted 3-PW Steel Iron Shafts .355 Taper Tip -- Set of 8 shafts

4 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $179.99 + $10.55 shipping
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by GolfBestBuy.
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • UNCUT RIFLE PROJECT X 5.0 FLIGHTED 3-PW Steel Iron Shafts
  • Condition: Brand New. Never been used. Might have occasional scratches from sitting around.
  • Flex: Regular 5.0
  • UNCUT Lengths: 37.5", 38", 38.5", 39", 39.5", 40", 40.5", 41"
  • Tip Size: 0.355 Taper Tip

Amazon Golf Store



Product Description

You are looking at 8 brand new Rifle Project X steel iron shafts. These shafts are un-cut and have never been played. They might have a few occasional scratches from sitting around. Each iron shaft retails in golf stores and major online retailers for $35+. A set of Project X shafts like this could run up to $300. Please take a look at the information below, and let us know if you have any questions.

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B004E9DWJ4
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,501,341 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
100%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
Love the shafts, I hit the ball low but these help get the ball in the air for me, but wouldn't recommend in wedges. The ball flight is too high and I lost about 7-10 yards per wedge. I use a 50,54, and 58 degree. I read a lot of reviews about sweepers vs. divot takers so to just add to it I am a divot taker.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse