|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Engaging dramatic plot, but doesn't fit with the period, April 18, 2001
Charlotte Ribard, whose world has just fallen apart, takes out her feelings of betrayal on Francis Storbridge, her father's former secretary and her one-time friend. He had come to help her when she was lost and alone and devastated; she assumed that he was tarred with the same brush as her villainous, murdering father.Five years later, Francis is an MP and in a position of some influence, and Charlotte desperately needs his help. Since he had been in love with her for years anyway, his pride led him to state - as a challenge - that the price of his assistance was marriage to her. He never expected that she'd agree, but she did, so they marry, a marriage of convenience in which Charlotte doesn't trust Francis one bit and his pride won't allow him to tell her the truth about himself. Into this relationship add the return of Charlotte's father, who now wants to plot to ruin Storbridge for his failure to support his plan for a new railway. This leads us into the political sub-plot of the book. Unlike the last reviewer, I enjoyed this very much and it was, in fact, the best-researched and most entertaining part of the book. One minor criticism at this point is that there were rather too many characters to keep track of; admittedly, some of them were from previous books in the series, but I had not read those previous books (both now out of print), and had to keep reminding myself of who these people were and what their relationship was to the protagonists. I have very mixed feelings about this book. While I enjoyed the political sub-plot, I found it very difficult to concentrate on the romance and the personal interaction between the characters, because quite simply very few of these characters belonged anywhere but in the present day. The dialogue was far too modern for the period. Now, while I don't expect writers to stuff their dialogue with obselete words, neither do I expect to see contractions all over the place and modern expressions used. At one point, Charlotte even says 'bloody hell'; now, while it's just possible that a gentleman of that period would use such an expression, a lady would never have done so. Period behaviour is also very much lacking - I was incredulous to see Francis' young sisters-in-law (aged 17 and 11) talking openly about mistresses, and to him as well. If young unmarried girls even knew of the existence of such a thing as mistresses - and they usually didn't - they would never dream of mentioning this in front of adults. Serena, who is 11, was treated as if she was at least 17, both in her conversation and in the way she was allowed to stay up late, join the adults at dinner (even formal dinners, which would be unheard of) and at the theatre. Grant's male characters also treated the women in a way which, although common nowadays, was completely unheard of two hundred years ago. No man ever discussed anything of any importance with his wife or daughters if he could avoid it; the idea that Francis, Paul, Silverton and Robert would involve their wives in their planning is ridiculous for the period. And finally, a two-year-old being able to pronounce 'explosion' perfectly and know what the word means?! Please! While there were parts of this book I enjoyed, I was jolted out of the story by historical impossibilities far too often for me to read anything else by Tracy Grant.
|