Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870-2033 (Pelican)
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870-2033 (Pelican) [Mass Market Paperback]

Michael Young (Author)
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback $24.95  
Mass Market Paperback --  

Book Description

Pelican January 1, 1962

Michael Young has christened the oligarchy of the future “Meritocracy.” Indeed, the word is now part of the English language. It would appear that the formula: IQ+Effort=Merit may well constitute the basic belief of the ruling class in the twenty-first century. Projecting himself into the year 2034, the author of this sociological satire shows how present decisions and practices may remold our society.

It is widespread knowledge that it is insufficient to be somebody's nephew to obtain a responsible post in business, government, teaching, or science. Experts in education and selection apply scientific principles to sift out the leaders of tomorrow. You need intelligence rating, qualification, experience, application, and a certain caliber to achieve status. In a word, one must show merit to advance in the new society of tomorrow.

In a new opening essay, Young reflects on the reception of his work, and its production, in a candid and lively way. Many of the critical ambiguities surrounding its original publication are now clarified and resolved. What we have is what the Guardian of London called “A brilliant essay.” and what Time and Tide described as “a fountain gush of new ideas. Its wit and style make it compulsively enjoyable reading from cover to cover.”

"Has the thrill of immediate relevance. . .its thinking is consistently rich and fascinating. Young is onto a big theme, involving fundamental questions about social organiation and individual dignity. What drives the book is Young's having identified one of the fundamental paradoxes of what we would call liberalism and the British would call socialism: the liberal dream of equal opportunity." --Nicholas Lemann, The Atlantic Monthly

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.


Product Details

  • Mass Market Paperback: 190 pages
  • Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics) (January 1, 1962)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0140204857
  • ISBN-13: 978-0140204858
  • Product Dimensions: 7.1 x 4.2 x 0.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #402,954 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A far-sighted prophet, December 30, 2006
By 
Howard Aldrich (Chapel Hill, NC USA) - See all my reviews
Even though Michael Young was clearly disturbed by the possibility of a society totally based on assigning educational & occupational positions to people based solely on "objective" indicators of merit -- mainly, IQ tests -- he nonetheless made a powerful case for why such a system could arise. Although he didn't credit Max Weber, Young's ideas about the rationalization of social life, based on ruthless means/ends assessments, clearly owe a huge debt to Weber. Young portrayed pre-WWII England as riven with class distinctions, with its economic & social institutions held back by the veneration of traditional elite privileges. Thus, his depiction of post 1959-England follows logically from his account of how various political parties and social movements championed replacing the old system with one that rewarded merit, not the legacies of birth. Most amazing to me is Young's prescient description of how a potent feminist movement arose in the 1960s & 70s to push for greater rewards to merit, regardless of gender. (Remember: he was writing in the late 1950s!) I highly recommend reading this book in conjunction with Jerome Karabel's book, The Chosen, which chronicles the growth of merit-based admissions policies at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, in response to the same forces that Young describes (Karabel does cite Young's book). Despite its age, this book is most assuredly NOT dated! However, readers unfamiliar with English social history in the 20th century will no doubt miss a lot of Young's subtle satire.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars May have made too good a case!, July 29, 2003
By 
Bobby Newman (Long Beach, NY USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Dr. Young gives us a description of a society that abolishes priority based on family lines, and instead is based on intellectual achievement. He warns us against the excesses of such a system, but he does it an interesting way that treads dangerous ground. His narrator is firmly in support of the meritocracy system, and is given great eloquence by the author. Much as Aldous Huxley did in Brave New World, the system he seeks to question is championed by a very effective communicator. Some readers may not realize that Young was NOT an ardent supporter of the meritocracy idea, such is the eloquence of the narrator in its support. An interesting book that contributes greatly to the discussion, both pro and con. The final lines were beneath the rest of the book. A fiction writer can always make his point by having the characters behave in keeping with his theory. The philosophy was much better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars They missed his point., June 6, 2009
By 
not a natural "Bob Bickel" (huntington, west virginia United States) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)   
The term meritocracy came to the fore in 1958 when the British sociologist Michael F.D. Young published a satirical account of aggressively achievement-based modern societies. In Rise of the Meritocracy, young introduced the concept into sociological discourse and the popular lexicon. However, meritocracy, as young wrote about it, was a caricature of social policy excesses promulgated in pursuit of the ill-defined goals of social efficiency and merit-based justice.

Whatever Young's intention, meritocracy failed to catch on as a satirical caricature, but quickly became an exemplar, a composite of organizing principles for the modern world. The idea of meritocracy, a society in which social roles and rewards are distributed according to realized ability and demonstrated performance, became a point of departure for evaluating the workings of our social world.

Whatever the cultural forces that distorted public perception of Rise of the Meritocracy, those forces seem to be pervasive and powerful. For example, fifteen years after its publication, Herrnstein and Murray's The Bell Curve. a celebration of the presumed realization of meritocracy, still sells very well. Critical reviews of The Bell Curve commonly are met with hostility, and the fact that it has rightly been dismissed as "junk science" and "social science pornography" seems only to affirm its readers' faith. There seems to be an abiding and widespread fear that the truly meritorious -- you, me, whomever -- will lose their rightful place and suitable level of compensation because brains and hard work will not be rewarded.

But look around us, take full toll of the economic mess that the U.S. is in now: is this a meritocracy? Looks to me as if the boys and girls who ostensibly have the brains have been short-sighted, willfully stupid, and limitlessly greedy. I think meritocracy works best as satire and caricature, and Young was right.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(285)
(284)
(324)
(297)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:







i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...