The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy [Paperback]

Lothrop Stoddard (Author), Madison Grant (Introduction), Sam Sloan (Introduction)

Book Description

Publication Date: March 21, 2010

This book was made famous by a one-page mention in "The Great Gatsby", a novel which remains today the most popular work of fiction ever written. These lines were also repeated word for word in the movie by that name starring Robert Redford. This book, "The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy" is one of the most virulently racist books ever written. However, it makes some perfectly valid points. The main point to the book is that it was written in 1920. World War I, then called "The Great War", had just ended with 15 million people killed. The author states that with White European People constantly killing each other and with the so-called "Colored People" not killing each other, or at least not so frequently, plus having a higher birth rate, the inevitable result will be that the "colored people" will take over the whole world including Europe. He points out that the Japanese had just defeated Russia in the Russo-Japanese War, the first time an Asian nation had ever defeated an European nation, and he correctly predicted that soon Japan would attack America.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Theodore Lothrop Stoddard (June 29, 1883 – May 1, 1950) was an American political scientist, historian, journalist, anthropologist, eugenicist, pacifist, and anti-immigration advocate who wrote a number of books which are often cited as prominent examples of early 20th-century scientific racism. He published many unashamedly racialist books on what he saw as the peril of immigration, his most famous being The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy in 1920. In this book he presented a view of the world situation pertaining to race focusing concern on the coming population explosion among the "colored" peoples of the world and the way in which "white world-supremacy" was being lessened in the wake of World War I and the collapse of colonialism. Stoddard's analysis divided world politics and situations in to "white," "yellow," "black," "Amerindian," and "brown" peoples and their interactions. Stoddard argued race and heredity were the guiding factors of history and civilization, and that the elimination or absorption of the "white" race by "colored" races would result in the destruction of Western civilization. Like Madison Grant (see The Passing of the Great Race), Stoddard divided the white race into three main divisions: Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean. He considered all three to be of good stock, and far above the quality of the colored races, but argued that the Nordic was the greatest of the three and needed to be preserved by way of eugenics. Unlike Grant, Stoddard was less concerned with which varieties of European people were superior to others (Nordic theory), but was more concerned with what he called "bi-racialism," seeing the world as being composed of simply "colored" and "white" races. In the years after the Great Migration and World War I, Grant's racial theory would fall out of favor in the U.S. in favor of a model closer to Stoddard's.

Product Details

• Paperback: 356 pages
• Publisher: Ishi Press (March 21, 2010)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 487187849X
• ISBN-13: 978-4871878494
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #5,244,319 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

44 of 59 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Prophet of the 20th Century, August 30, 1999

By A Customer

This review is from: Rising Tide of Colour Against White World Supremacy (Hardcover)

The Rising Tide of Color is an incredible work by a Harvard scholar. Lothrop Stoddard predicted in 1920 that the West would be overrun by the rising tide of color if we lost our will and the sense of identity that all other races take for granted. Of course, he was correct.

Future historians may wonder why we did not heed his warning. The question, as he seems to see it, is not whether there will be "racism" or equality. The question is whose race will prevail in the struggle for power.

Though it is usually dismissed as "racist" the book is actually a broad combination of foriegn affairs, world history and racial realities. While it is not very flattering to blacks, Stoddard actually urges whites to stop thinking of Asians as "inferior."

In fact, he was one of the first to realize that Asians could understand Western science and technology and use it to their own advantage.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Well worth a read, April 9, 2010

By 

Paul Magnussen (Campbell, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   

This review is from: The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy (Paperback)

This book was not quite what I expected.

Stoddard's work, alongside that of Madison Grant, is frequently cited as planting the banner of Scientific Racism in the United States. Consequently, the tone of the book quite surprised me.

RACISM

To what extent was Stoddard a racist?

To answer this question we need that seldom-found thing, a definition of racism that withstands more than momentary scrutiny. Thomas Sowell provides a useful one [1]:

' "Racism" is a term not only used very loosely by many, but also a term for which a more precise definition is not easy to achieve. In various usages, the term applies to the ideas of (1) those who have an animosity to those of another race, (2) those who believe that people of another race are genetically inferior, (3) those who believe in discriminating against people of another race, out of sheer self-interest, and (4) those who believe that people of another race or ethnic group are less capable, or have other undesirable traits, as of a given time, even if for non-genetic reasons. Those who believe all these things at the same time provide the clearest examples of racism. But all four notions need not go together and often do not.'

Stoddard doesn't seem to belong in categories (2) or (4): for instance, consider the following:

'Certainly no one has ever denied the Chinaman's extraordinary economic efficiency. Winnowed by ages of grim elimination in a land populated to the uttermost limits of subsistence, the Chinese race is selected as no other for survival under the fieriest conditions of economic stress. At home the average Chinese lives his whole life literally within a hand's breadth of starvation. Accordingly, when removed to the easier environment of other lands, the Chinaman brings with him a working capacity which simply appalls his competitors.'

It's true that the ravings of Madison Grant's preface to the present book would not seem out of place in Mein Kampf -- indeed, Grant's The Passing of the Great Race was the first non-German book ordered to be reprinted by the Nazis when they took power in Germany, and Adolf Hitler wrote to Grant, "The book is my Bible".

By contrast, however, Stoddard himself seems quite rational.

STODDARD'S THESIS

Stoddard's thesis can be simply stated, and indeed is so stated by him:

'Wherever the white man goes he attempts to impose the bases of his ordered civilization. He puts down tribal war, he wages endless combat against epidemic disease, and he so improves communications that augmented and better food supplies minimize the blight of famine. In response to these life-saving activities the enormous death-rate which in the past has kept the colored races from excessive multiplication is falling to proportions comparable with the death-rate of white countries. But to lower the colored world's prodigious birth-rate is quite another matter. The consequence is a portentous increase of population in nearly every portion of the colored world now under white political sway. In fact, even those colored countries which have maintained their independence, such as China and Japan, are adopting the white man's life-conserving methods and are experiencing the same accelerated increase of population.

Now what must be the inevitable result of all this? It can mean only one thing: a tremendous and steadily augmenting outward thrust of surplus colored men from overcrowded colored homelands. Remember that those homelands are already populated up to the available limit of subsistence. Of course present limits can in many cases be pushed back by better living conditions, improved agriculture, and the rise of modern machine industry such as is already underway in Japan. Nevertheless, in view of the tremendous population increases which must occur, these can only be palliatives. Where, then, should the congested colored world tend to pour its accumulating human surplus, inexorably condemned to emigrate or starve? The answer is: into those emptier regions of the earth under white political control.'

Presumably Stoddard feels this to be a Bad Thing (otherwise why write the book?), but unless I've missed it, he doesn't actually say so. Possibly he thinks it's so obvious it doesn't need saying. Again, if he bears any animosity to the nonwhite races (by which I mean wishing them ill), I must have missed where he says so. Stoddard, then, presumably belongs in Sowell's category (3).

Of course, the bit about minimizing the blight of famine would have enchanted those who had to deal with (for example) the results of the British East India Company's replacement of Bengali subsistence crops with opium; but unfortunately they're unavailable for comment. Whether Stoddard was unaware of things like this (he had a Ph.D. in History) or simply chose to ignore them is not clear. But he is disarmingly frank about other matters that have since been swept under the carpet, some not without topical relevance:

"At Versailles the European Powers showed unequivocally that they had no intention of relaxing their hold upon the Near and Middle East. By a number of secret treaties negotiated during the war the Ottoman Empire had been virtually partitioned between the victorious Allies, and these secret treaties formed the basis of the Versailles settlement. [...]

But there was another side to the shield. During the war years the Allied statesmen had officially proclaimed times without number that the war was being fought to establish a new world-order based on such principles as the rights of small nations and the liberty of all peoples. These pronouncements had been treasured and memorized throughout the East. When, therefore, the East saw a peace settlement based, not upon these high professions, but upon the imperialistic secret treaties, it was fired with a moral indignation and a sense of outraged justice never known before."

SUMMARY

In short, whatever you think of the author's assumptions and stance, this book is both historically important and very interesting to read.

REFERENCES

[1] Sowell, Thomas (1998) Conquests and Cultures. (Basic, ISBN 0-465-01399-6)

26 of 38 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Forbidden book, very informative, August 28, 1999

By A Customer

This review is from: Rising Tide of Colour Against White World Supremacy (Hardcover)

I was impressed with how this work counters much of the "politically correct" nonsense on campus. The egalitarian establishment would very much like to to ban this work, they have already done much to keep it from potential readers. Changing dermagraphics mated with Pavlonian "PC" conditioning will allow them to ban this book soon. My advice is to get this book and read it while you still can.