Qty:1
  • List Price: $54.00
  • Save: $12.51 (23%)
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by apex_media
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Ships direct from Amazon! Qualifies for Prime Shipping and FREE standard shipping for orders over $25. Overnight and 2 day shipping available!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Add to Cart
Trade in your item
Get a $1.31
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Robert Boyle: A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) Paperback – November 13, 1996

ISBN-13: 978-0521567961 ISBN-10: 0521567963

Buy New
Price: $41.49
19 New from $29.98 20 Used from $15.40
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$41.49
$29.98 $15.40
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

Robert Boyle: A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) + Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle
Price for both: $58.19

Buy the selected items together
  • Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle $16.70

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Series: Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy
  • Paperback: 212 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (November 13, 1996)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521567963
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521567961
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 5.9 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #911,228 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"This work, which admirably testifies to Boyle's equal concern for 'truth and philosophical freedom' and 'religion', deserves this new edition. And, as Davis and Hunter suggest at the end of their introduction, today an essay on the idea of nature can have more than a simple historical significance." Guido Giglioni, Isis

Book Description

Published in 1686, this work attacked prevailing notions of the natural world that depicted "Nature" as a wise, benevolent and purposeful being. It represents one of the subtlest statements concerning the issues raised by the mechanical philosophy that emerged from the Scientific Revolution.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Viktor Blasjo on August 30, 2013
Format: Paperback
This is a timid and superficial critique of the pre-scientific notion of nature as quasi-sentient and teleological. Much the bulk of the treatise is wasted on cautious and defensive arguments that a mechanical view of nature is not heretical, but that on the contrary it is the opposing view that is "dangerous to religion" (p. 62) whereas "I hope our doctrine ... may induce men to pay their admiration ... directly to God himself" rather than to what "men are wont to call the works of nature" (p. 163), etc., etc.

A highlight of the work, in my opinion, is this allegorical statement of the critical method: "For I am wont to judge of opinions as of coins: I consider much less, in any one that I am to receive, whose inscription it bears, than what metal it is made of. It is indifferent enough to me whether it was stamped many years or ages since, or came but yesterday from the mint. Nor do I regard through how many, or how few, hands it has passed for current, provided I know by the touchstone or any sure trial purposely made, whether or no it be genuine, and does or does not deserve to have been current. For if upon due proof it appears to be good, its having been long and by many received for such will not tempt me to refuse it. But if I find it counterfeit, neither the prince's image or inscription, nor its date (how ancient soever), nor the multitude of hands through which it has passed unsuspected will engage me to receive it. And one disfavouring trial, well made, will much more discredit it with me than all those specious things I have named can recommend it." (p.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?