Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Rockwell RC4254K Variable Speed 5-Inch Random Orbit Sander

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Working on a home project? Need some help? Check out Amazon Home Services and get a $20 Amazon Gift Card when you book your first service. Learn more


Technical Details

  • heavy-duty

Product Description

From the Manufacturer

Dual-handle design orbital sander reduces fatigue and increases control.

Product Information

Technical Details

Item Weight 8.2 pounds
Product Dimensions 14.3 x 9.6 x 6.2 inches
Special Features heavy-duty
Included Components case

Additional Information

ASIN B0014GN4GQ
Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #1,865,620 in Home Improvements (See top 100)
#901 in Home Improvement > Power & Hand Tools > Power Tools > Sanders > Random-Orbit Sanders
Shipping Weight 8.2 pounds
Date First Available November 18, 2014

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
My husband had been looking for a replacement for his old handheld sander for a couple of years. He was specific, wanted variable speed on the trigger for ease and control of use. Also wanted type could use two hands if needed. This model was perfect and he is very satisfied with the purchase. It seems to be very sturdy and well made. Item was securely packaged and quickly shipped.
Comment 1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse