- Paperback: 466 pages
- Publisher: P & R Publishing (June 1, 2000)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0875520928
- ISBN-13: 978-0875520926
- Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 5.4 x 1 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 2.3 out of 5 stars See all reviews (131 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,135,601 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Roman Catholicism Paperback – June 1, 2000
2016 Book Awards
Browse award-winning titles. See all 2016 winners
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
If you’re the author, publisher, or rights holder of this book, let ACX help you produce the audiobook.Learn more.
Top Customer Reviews
Lorraine Boettner's thorough and expansive treatment of Roman Catholicism has certainly become a classic since its first publication in 1962, widely disseminated and used as a basis for further critiques. Boettner's book is, however, also infamous. The book's infamy stems from its method of argumentation which combines various strategies: not only biblical exegesis, citation of Reformed creeds, quotations from Protestant authorities, and social analysis, but also innuendo, guilt by association, half-truths, and distortions of Roman Catholic teaching. Today, the book is also rather dated, failing to take account of the Second Vatican Council and other developments in 20th century Roman Catholic biblical and theological studies. For all its 450 pages, there is very little of continuing and helpful substance. It is, however, fun to read and bears witness to the polemics of an earlier era (one would wish!).
I do not have the space here to give a complete analysis of Boettner's shortcomings, but will cite some representative examples. Moreover, I do not speak here as an apologist for the Roman Catholic church. I am, in fact, like Boettner, a Reformed Protestant, though also a philosophy professor at a Roman Catholic University. It does not seem to me, however, that the cause of Protestant Christianity is well-served by inaccurate portrayals of other traditions or criticisms that only attack straw men. I write this review, then, on behalf of truth.Read more ›
My curiosity was piqued and I began to devour every book I could find that would shed some light on how the early Christians read and understood scripture (starting with William A. Jurgens', "Faith of The Early Fathers") . It took the good Dr. Boettner to get me interested enough to finally begin searching for the truth - and it led me deeper into the Faith I was raised in. Thanks Dr. Boettner!
The work reads well and lacks some of the caustic tone seen in these reviews. It lacks sound references in an academic sense - i.e., footnotes, bibliographies to specific editions, etc., typical for the time but unacceptable today. The reason? Because some of Boettner's facts are just wrong. Look at "Some Roman Catholic Heresies and Inventions in the introduction. "Baptizing of bells" is presented so the reader thinks that bells are actually baptized, a simply unexcusable stretch of the facts in a book filled with such items.
Boettner consistently uses religious terms that mean different things to Protestants and Roman Catholics. This is the root of much of the book's misleading statements and a cause of this controversy. As Christians (you potential reader) I suggest you refrain from this book and look elsewhere. There are many better books (on both sides of the controversy!) That this one sells is largely due to the nature of the audience that reads it, an audience afraid to have its assumptions challenged and afraid to undertake the difficult labor of validating this work. Don't take this short-cut. Get James White's "The Roman Catholic Controversy" or on the other side try Karl Keating's book. Both of these writers do a good job of presenting the case as Christians ought to do, and include academically rigorous footnotes, bibiographies, etc. Those are good values for the money.
Pick a side, pick a better book. But don't pick this one. It is dramatically outdated and very often clearly incorrect regarding today's Roman Catholic church.
By way of disclosure, I'm Protestant clergy with a theology training from the University of Cambridge.
Why I'm not giving only one star for this bad book?Because this book, is the root of modern anti-catholicism.If you read the anti-catholics books from Jimmy Swaggart, Billy Graham, etc. and read this bad book, you will see, how many anti-catholics plagiarisms supposed "from God" are in fact, from this trash-book.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The book is another one of the polemical tracks that's main deficit is scholarship. I wonder if this man got one of those mail in PHD's, or worse yet out of a gumball machine.Published 18 days ago by mjk
This is the best book that I have read on Roman Catholicism. It documents the statements made with quotes from original sources. as well as critiques with Bible quotes. Read morePublished 2 months ago by Robert Patton
This is an excellent book with much valuable information on the cultish teachings of the Catholic Church that include the Syllabus of Errors from the 19th century that are still... Read morePublished 4 months ago by Richard Ruhling
Deeply theological study of the errors that still exist in the Catholic church.Published 8 months ago by mh7630
This book is often cited as if it were an academic work, but it only has the semblance of a scholarly work. Read morePublished 10 months ago by Randall
"Roman Catholicism" (1962) is a classic Evangelical Protestant assessment of Catholicism in general and American Catholicism in particular, written at the pinnacle of that... Read morePublished 16 months ago by Tom
I have not read the book, but I recently read a book "Rome Sweet Rome" By Scott and Kimberly Hahn. he mentions in his book that he was definitely an Anti Catholic. Read morePublished 21 months ago by PeggyCass