14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beyond TR, the Election of 1912 and Fueling an Expanded Democracy, November 13, 2009
This review is from: Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy (American Political Thought) (Hardcover)
Many people today think of the election of 1912 simply as Theodore Roosevelt's challenge of his predecessor, William Taft. However, as Milkins demonstrates in his highly detailed book, the election was the rise of the middle class, workers, union, women and black Americans in their attempt to re-establish a virtual second revolution that would attempt to limit political power from the élites in society. To think that U.S. Senators were not popularly elected until 1913, women did not have the right to vote until 1919 and the Progressive Party that reached its national peak in 1912; that it initially sowed the seeds for the New Deal makes it obvious that the election of 1912 was critical in re-establishing greater participation in the U.S government. However, as Milkins clearly establishes, this was not just the Progressive party but also the Socialist party led by Eugene Debbs that creates and atmosphere of change and greater inclusion. Robert La Follette was the most likely leader of the Progressive Party; however, he was overshadowed by TR's name and political largess. The book is fascinating in the detail of Roosevelt's initial challenge to the Taft within the Republican Party as a moderate, progressive rival, winning several primaries only to lose at the convention. Later, TR quickly re-emerges as the Progressive party's national candidate after a bitter challenge by La Follette. Within this run for the presidency, major figures are involved such as the Jane Adams, one of the foremost leaders of woman's suffrage, W.E. B. Dubois the great civil rights activist, Booker T. Washington, and of course Eugene Debs. The Progressive party was essentially the rise of the middle class efforts to include the working man, stealing a theme from the socialist movement, yet oddly did not include unions, was politically shrewd about black representation and with women's suffrage. Of course, TR and Progressive party had an effect on Wilson who modified his views as many politicians do during the election and was described by the English press as a man statesman like forbearance. The election was also the first where a candidate actively campaigned on his own behalf, TR forcing others to follow and the first to have film reels of the candidates in theaters with early voice over provided by Thomas Edison's phonograph. A time that gave birth to FDR's New Deal and in a sense mirrors the 60s, obviously less radical, but certainly from an intellectual standpoint. The book does slow down a bit before the final run up to the election, but the information Milkis provides in this 296-page book is a revelation on how progressive that period actually was, particularly in shaping government today.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Great Tale of Today and a Century Ago, April 23, 2010
This review is from: Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy (American Political Thought) (Hardcover)
The book by Milkis on Teddy Roosevelt and the Progressives is in many ways a tale of the present. The 1912 election was a turning point for American politics. It brought in Wilson and sent Teddy packing, but in many ways left the baggage that Teddy brought with him around for what seems a permanent stay.
Milkis tells a wonderful tale based on extensive research about this election. It is an historically well written piece albeit filled with consecutive facts but lacking in the interpretation and historical glue to make it a superb work, it is masterful notwithstanding.
The path of the book works back and forth on the New Freedoms of Wilson and the New Nationalism of TR. Milkis discusses these in Chapter 1 and the discussion is a somewhat back and forth discussion of the principles and the time which evoked them. The New Nationalism is best described in the TR speech of the same name in 1910. The New Freedoms is best described by the author on page 205 in a memo from Brandeis to Wilson. There is the ever presence of Brandeis in this book which is a powerful description of the great mind evolving his thoughts through the somewhat academic mind of Wilson. Brandeis states:
"The two parties (Wilson and the Democrats versus TR and the Progressives) differ fundamentally regarding economic policy....The Democratic Party insists that competition can and should be maintained in every branch of private industry...if at any future time if monopoly should appear to be desirable in any branch of industry, the monopoly should be a public one.....the New Party (Progressives) ...insists that private monopoly may be desirable..."
This is a powerful statement which reflected the beginning in many ways of the power of the executive and the dominance of the central Government over the entire economy. Wilson agreed with this statement and what is most telling in the Milkis book is that the 1912 election was truly and election on principles, principle articulated directly by the players in that election. They were direct and forthright and presented their views of how the Government and the country should be run. Lacking was as reflected by Milkis any discussion of what the Constitution and Founders had ever intended. There appeared to be a unanimous agreement that change, as articulated by either Wilson/Brandeis or TR and the Progressives, was well within their purview and powers, independent of the Constitution.
The Socialists agenda under Debs is somewhat articulated by Milkis and he states on p 23 that Debs viewed the Progressives as "a reactionary protest of the middle classes, built largely upon the personality of one man and not destined for permanence." Ironically it would be Wilson who imprisoned Debs for his ideas, as well as my grandmother who headed the Socialist Party in New York. Wilson would leave Debs to rot for years until the Republican Harding pardoned him.
TR is quoted in his New Nationalism speech on p 40 as saying:
"The New Nationalism puts national need before sectional or personal advantage...Nationalism regards the executive as the steward of the public welfare. It demands of the judiciary that it shall be interested primarily in human welfare rather than property...."
It was this denial of the Lockeian property construct which was at the heart of the Constitution. Milkis on the same page reinforces the TR stance of "human rights" trumping "property rights". There does seem to be the conflict, perhaps of the time, that humans have property and that in many ways it was property via Locke that defines the individual as compared to a vassal of the King. TR and the Progressives seem to be driven by the Trusts and their "property" and the general hatred for these same Trusts.
On p 44 Milkis discusses the conflicts of TR and the Constitution. I would have liked to see this better presented, it is discussed but it is in itself a key element of importance who relation to the present is key. This returns again on p 91 where Milkis states:
"In the end, TR and his political allies proposed to emancipate public opinion from the restraining influence of the Declaration (of Independence) and the Constitution..."
TR was clearly a man who had his own ideas and the facts and history of the country be damned. The Wilson plan of the New Freedoms was in contradistinction to TR. On p 202 the author compares and contrasts them but in many ways they had much in common. Monopolies seem to dominate the discussion. TR was advocating for the referendum, recall and the like, pushing the power down to the people, and even to the extent of having recall of the President (see p 219). In contrast Wilson was defending natural rights but stopped way short of recalls as TR had done (p 226)
Overall the book is a superb introduction to these many issues. The growth of the larger electorate, the conflict between large industries and labor, the expansion of the middle class, and even the conflicts on racial issues. TR had become an idealists with a platform designed to attract the largest group of common voters. He had developed his own ideas as how the country should be run and his New Nationalism was in a sense a new Constitution, drafted by a single man who then set out to sell it. Wilson was driven by the intent to concentrate mow power in both the executive as well as in Washington.
The book by
Woodrow Wilson: A Biography by Cooper is a wonderful companion to this book. As a final note, the discussions on pp 274-275 places Wilson is the poorest of light as he deals with the civil rights of the blacks. Milkis details the occasion when Trotter, a black leader and editor of the Boston Guardian, was thrown out of Wilson's office abruptly because he disagreed with the President's refusal to even discuss the separate but equal position of the Democrats. Wilson as a Virginian had strong ties to the south and the south was the core to his ongoing efforts. This truly was a sad day.
Milkis has prepared a superb book worthy of reading today. It tells the tale of how many of the changes we see again coming up today are in many ways a replay of a century ago. The only critique that I have is that it should have been longer and included some greater detail. But it stands quite well as it is.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Political history at its best, September 22, 2010
This review is from: Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy (American Political Thought) (Hardcover)
By far the best book I have read on TR and the Progressive Party. Milkis is a professor of politics and historians may feel a little cheated. He does not write like a historian, weaving archival data into a rich tapestry to give readers a sense of what life was like at the time. Instead, he writes to clarify political issues, explaining this period to explore its impact on the development of American politics. Although he does not discuss today's tea party movement or contemporary American liberals, readers will come to understand how both groups can trace their origins and patterns to the election of 1912. That, of course, is the ultimate goal when political science professors look to the past. Even so, the detail and depth do put the reader in the events. However, what I really enjoyed most about the book was the writing. It is not beach reading, but neither will it force you to run to the dictionary. On the other hand, Milkis assumes you know how to read a complex sentence, and can keep an idea in your head when you turn the page. It is very well organized and exceptionally well argued. I would say, if I were given to cliche, that I couldn't put it down, but it would be more correct to say that I couldn't wait to pick it back up again, and was sad when I finished it. Milkis aimed high, but the book accomplishes everything he sets it out to do. Those already familiar with the subject will not be disappointed, but I recommend it for anyone interested in TR, the Progressive Party, the Election of 1912, or just interested in a good read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
