Most Helpful Customer Reviews
54 of 62 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Insightful Look at One of History's Forgotten Chapters, May 3, 2006
This review is from: Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves and the American Revolution (Hardcover)
First of all, I want to establish that Simon Schama is a terrific writer, keenly observant and generous with the telling details. And he has a lot of details in this marvelously researched book. ROUGH CROSSINGS deals with a topic that I don't remember running across in any history class I've taken (and I have an M.A. in the subject.) During the Revolutionary War, black slaves fought for freedom... their OWN freedom from their colonial masters, and they did so on the side of the English. The fact that slaves' colonial masters were in many cases the Founding Fathers of the U.S. makes this book utterly fascinating. The Brits encouraged and used escaped slaves for all facets of warfare, even forming a unit called the Ethiopian Regiment. (Kidnapped West Africans fighting for their liberty by supporting a monarch against a budding republic based on human rights?! Go figure.) And since the slaves were fighting for a losing cause, many of them ended up stranded afterwards in Nova Scotia. The Brits eventually shipped many of them back to West Africa to found Sierra Leone. (Ironically, this was located in a spot where the slave trade had been long established.) Although Sierra Leone seemed like a brilliant idea, Schama eloquently explains why the experiment didn't even last a generation. (One of George Washington's slaves helped found the government and ended up a rebel against it.) In telling this tragic tale, Schama (an Englishman, BTW) provides us with a small glimpse of what-might-have-been. And though it may take another century for Sierra Leone to stabilize and flourish, perhaps it's a glimpse of what-will-someday-be.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Long Journey Back to Africa, October 24, 2006
This review is from: Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves and the American Revolution (Hardcover)
For those readers who enjoyed last year's best seller, David McCullough's "1776," the present volume by Simon Schama will show the events of that same period in a whole new light. Once you thought you had the definitive story, a book such as this comes along and turns the story upside down. In this book, Schama writes of the promise of freedom offered by the British Monarchy to the American slaves who were willing to serve on the side of the crown. The offer of course was not entirely altruistic; King George had much to gain from depriving the ungrateful colonists of their workforce. But for the slaves this was an offer they couldn't refuse, and they were willing to risk life and limb to cross over to the British side. Much has been said about the Founding Fathers and the fact that they were slaveholders; Washington, Jefferson, and Franklin had all anguished over the morality of it. Yet not only did they retain their slaves, they acquiesced to the southern slaveholding states to allow it in order to get the constitution ratified. This poisoned the republic from the beginning and festered until it erupted with the Civil War many years later. It was one of the tragic ironies of the American Revolution; for all their high-minded ideals of independence and freedom, they could not let go of the institution of slavery which had given them their prosperity. Schama's wonderfully written account of this little-mentioned struggle is very engaging and sorrowful. Those slaves who found themselves under British rule after 1787 were shipped either to Nova Scotia, the Carribean, or London, where they encountered new hardships and a sense of betrayal. To a great extent the British, having lost their struggle to control the colonists, were looking for places to unload their new subjects. In this sordid affair, Schama finds some heroic characters. One of these characters was Thomas Peter, who was one of the ex-slaves shipped off to the barren and chilly Nova Scotia, where the land they had been promised was virtually uninhabitable. In 1971, Peters went to London representing 202 families to plead with the British government to ship them back to Africa. As Schama tells it, Peters was the first genuine African-American political leader. The other unsung heroes were the abolitionists Granville Sharp and Thomas Clarkson, both of whom relentlessly challenged the institution of slavery through the courts. There was also John Clarkson, Thomas's younger brother and Royal Navy captain, who was responsible for resettling thousands of ex-slaves from Nova Scotia to Sierra Leone. The promised land of Sierra Leone turned out initially to be another tragedy. Not only were their high expectations of freedom not met, they encountered lingering slavery, disease, and death. Yet with the persistence of the ex-slaves and the abolitionists, Freetown became by the end of the 1790's a thriving community. Schama has done a magnificent job of telling the story of this struggle and giving a voice to those who ultimately made it succeed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
47 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Hipocrisy knows no bounds, September 25, 2005
This review is from: Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves and the American Revolution (Hardcover)
There appears to be two kinds of political history: that which is hidden from us completely by the special interests, and that which can be dug up and exposed when it is "safe". Rough Crossings by Simon Shama is of the latter, and will stir up a storm of indignation when it is published in the USA in 2006. Starting even before the Revolutionary War, so-called American Patriots and our founding fathers exhibited the same kind of special interest/self interest that schoolchildren today are taught is beneath public service. Patrick (Give me liberty or give me death!) Henry could not for the life of him understand why he should free his own slaves. Thomas Jefferson's first declaration of independence in 1775 cited the British government's rumored incitement of Negroes to rise up for their freedom as one of the prime movers of the colonies to break free of the tyranny of England. He was proven right in that tens of thousands of slaves ran away to fight on the British side, against the colonists. The "Patriots" killed every runaway they could find before they got to the English ships. (The same was to occur in 1812, when the British and the Americans clashed again) The British, who of course taught the Americans everything they knew about slavery in the first place, had only recently begun to abhor it. Using the courts, English activists were able to obtain the freedom of people who were being captured in England to be shipped off to sugar plantations. The British public, caught up in this humanitarian, headline-making campaign, was offended by the tyranny of the Americans, just as the Americans were offended by the tyranny of the British in things like taxation. The result was armed conflict. Word of successes in English courts gave hope to the American slaves, and the southern slaveholders clearly only joined the revolution to protect slavery, as they would again in the Civil War 90 years later. Meanwhile, Jefferson had a change of heart and included much more humanitarian wording in the next draft of the declaration of independence. It was edited out to avoid offending the new southern allies the Patriots had acquired. During the war, Patriot General Sumter took to awarding slaves to soldiers for voluntary service, and sometimes also in lieu of pay. No sooner had the war ended, than black soldiers were rounded up and sent back to their owners, or auctioned off. It was actually a top priority of the Americans. Henry Laurens, a man who skimmed 10% on slave sales in the colonies, managed to insert a clause in the peace treaty that Negroes and other American property would not be carried away in the British withdrawal. the Land of Liberty made no pretence of equality. There follows great diversions - to new settlements in Sierra Leone and in Nova Scotia, with possibly the most important development of North America's first black political leader, Thomas Peters, fifty years before Frederick Douglass. Peters worked tirelessly on both sides of the Atlantic to obtain the rights promised by the Crown. In the early 1800s, failing to get an acutal law abolishing slavery through the House of Commons, MPs apparently agreed with testimony such as the Lord Mayor of London's, who claimed ending slavery would end the market for rotten codfish. This was apparently a delicacy shipped to the Caribbean, to be forced down the throats of slaves, who were force fed with iron bits and clamps holding their mouths open. The struggle has obviously continued - to this day - but the book is a well documented adventure of it in the present tense, complete with Perfect Storms that make Hurricane Katrina look like a spring shower, and brutality only non-fiction could get away with.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|