Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nothing too thrilling...(spoilers), January 12, 2010
I finished this book, and I might even read Reese's story if I happen upon it at the library. But despite the enthusiastic teasers for Reese's book on both the first and last pages of Royal's Bride, I'd be unlikely to purchase it after reading this tepid intro to the trilogy. I felt like I got to know Lily, the heroine, pretty well, but I didn't have the same connection to Royal, the hero. I just couldn't understand how someone who was supposed to be so honorable that he'd unwaveringly obey an ill-conceived deathbed request could at the same time be so lacking in honor as to seduce his intended's cousin, subsequently carry through with solidifying the engagement and then repeatedly choose to continue the affair. I also didn't understand how a father who so stupidly lost the family fortune could inspire such unquestioning faith in his deathbed schemes. Actually, that whole plot setup really gnawed at me, because it seemed that Royal and his brothers had been raised to follow their own paths and be independent. So I couldn't see why a father-- open-minded enough to raise an heir who would leave the estate and work in the fields to save his Barbados plantation-- wouldn't trust his sons to find their own ways to restore the family fortune. For this to work for me, I really needed a point where Royal went ahead and fought for his relationship with Lily, or vice versa. I liked Jocelyn and Christopher, but it was just a little too convenient (and a little too unromantic) that Lily gets her man because someone outside the relationship decides to take a risk in order to be happy. I just couldn't shake the feeling that Royal was willing to give up on her if things hadn't magically worked out. Not really so romantic, in my opinion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The girl is a watering pot!!! Just readable., April 1, 2010
I have to get off my chest that Lily is a watering pot! If the Duke turned her tears into money he would be filthy rich! I don't understand what is up (or down) with Kat Martin! I have read all her historical romances...she was one of my favorite authors. With her ability to bring the historical time period alive one feels like you're living in those times with the social life , the dresses, etc.
The Necklace Trilogy was great! Then she ruined everything with the Heart Trilogy being awful. Now, the Bride Trilogy is not off to a good start. Yes Royal is handsome and honorable and Lily has some good qualities. But, they are NOT a very exciting couple and the plot is long and convoluted and NOT very satisfying. There is a lot of DOWN time where Royal and Lily don't interact much. The on-going plot is rather boring and drags on and on... Fortunately, the sex is very good and hot.
Overall, it's readable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
1st book in the Bride Trilogy - EXCELLENT !, October 26, 2009
I lost of lot of hours of sleep over this book - I went to bed with ¼ of the book left and dreamt all night if Royal was going to honor his father last wish and marry Jocelyn or if he would follow his heart and marry his cousin Lily. I was concerned that Royal and Lily con to get Royal's family money back from a evil con-artist was going to backfire and then I wondered if Jocelyn (Royal fiancé) was going to run away with her true love... and if it would have a happy ending. It was a long night - I won't tell you how it ended but I closed the book happy and satisfied and wondering about things would work out for the rest of the brothers... I will just have to wait for her next book Reese's Bride due out Jan 2010 & Rule's Bride due out May 2010.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|