Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A good place to start, April 15, 2002
You should read this book until a better one comes along. Very few writers have ever personified their time and place like Mike Royko did Chicago. I guess the best thing about this book is that it reminds us of what we are missing. It also gave me a bit of detail in the life of a man that I had only known through his columns. Like most of us, Mike had some serious shortcomings (what appears to have been a serious alcohol problem stands out as number one). He also had a heart and drive for perfection that made his column so great, and (probably) his private life so sad. The `daily demon,' and the inability to settle for less made him the best columnist of his generation. This book was obviously written by an admirer. Perhaps someday there will be a more objective biography. For today if you want to understand Chicago in the last half of the twentieth century this book and a collection of Mike Royko's columns is a good place to start.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good for Royko fans, probably not otherwise, September 20, 2001
"Royko: A Life in Print" is a good book for fans who, like me, may not have been aware of many aspects of his personal history. As such, the book delivers the goods and is a fairly straightforward retelling of the life of "The Best Columnist of His Generation." That said, if you're not a fan, there isn't much here that would compell you to read this book. The author interviewed a lot of Royko's friends and associates, and the portrayal that comes across is one of a hardworking, fair-minded, alcoholic columnist from the old school of two-fisted journalism who had an uncanny ability to find the right tone in the over 8,000 columns that he wrote. Unfortunately, the book doesn't really manage to get inside Royko's head, other than to show the obvious. He was a product of his relatively poor, urban ethnic upbringing, and he had insecurities that continued to plague him despite his massive success. He loathed racism in the 1960s, but also came to loathe political correctness in the 1990s. He blasted the senior Mayor Daley at every turn, but came to support his son despite having compared him to one of the three stooges. All of this Ciccone dutifully recounts, as well as Royko's troubled private life and prickly relationship with his professional colleagues. Overall, this book benefits from having Mike Royko as its subject, but ultimately it does not transcend him.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Royko revealed, July 3, 2005
I'd strongly recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand Royko, Chicago politics, Chicago journalism, or just wants a good biography to read. Ciccone does an excellent job not merely describing Royko's roots, but showing how that affected the person he became. Despite his brilliant writing, incisive political insights, and empathy for the ordinary Joe, Royko was a deeply troubled man. He was a severe alcoholic (as was his father before him), a workaholic who loved his family but was hardly ever around, a famous and successful columnist who was jealous of others and could hold a grudge like you wouldn't believe. When he remarried and started a second family (by adoption) after his first beloved wife's death, he spent more time on family things and tried to stop his self-destructive behavior, with limited success. Ciccone does not hide Royko's warts (and they were many), although he does become a bit of an apologist about his later, nastier side. Filled with anecdotes about Chicago's newspaper wars, sports teams (such as they are), its famous, infamous and not-famous-at-all, this will go on the shelf with all my other Chicagoana. One irritant, though. Ciccone is a newsman. He was managing editor for the Chicago Tribune and teaches journalism. Did he not read the proofs? Did his editor not read the proofs? Aside from such annoyances as the constant use of the word "anabuse" when he means "Antabuse", and calling Mike and his wife "the Royko's", Ciccone occasionally, gets repetitious, telling stories more than once in a way that makes it clear that he thinks he's saying it for the first time. But that's a minor quibble about an otherwise fine book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|