Most Helpful Customer Reviews
50 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Detailed Historical Background, Biased Depiction of Ratzinger/Benedict, October 4, 2006
This review is from: The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World (Hardcover)
While Gibson deserves significant praise for a thoroughly written, superbly researched historical approach to the background that provides the setting for the life of then Joseph Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI, this is a clearly polemical work set out against Ratzinger from the start.
Having studied the theological work of Joseph Ratzinger over more than a forty-year career, read all of the biographies currently on the market, and read the CDF promulgations and Benedict XVI's recent speeches and first encyclical - I feel that I have a relatively good understanding of the life and work of this man. While I do not necessarily agree with everything ever written or spoken by Ratzinger, I cannot clearly admit that the personal picture that is painted by Gibson of Ratzinger/Benedict is at all unbiased or close to accurate. For example, Gibson describes Ratzinger's approach to liberation theology as follows:
"This is in keeping with Ratzinger's grim, purist theological outlook, which sees even the slightest deviation from his view of tradition as tantamount to despoiling an entire theory or movement or person, a seduction so subtle we may not even realize it is happening." (Gibson 193)
This is hardly unbiased, and, frankly, not very accurate. It is an opinion of the author that is presented as objective.
That admitted. I must say that, historically, this is incredibly thorough. The setup is one of such depth that Gibson really does not get to the subject of Joseph Ratzinger until almost 150 pages into the book. The first part of the book is primarily concerned with the rise and reign of pope John Paul II. Only after that background is established does he move to introduce the current pontiff. What is nice about this approach is that while the outline for the program of the book is the life and career of Joseph Ratzinger, the author takes frequent side-trips through the history of the time. What is surprising is the little actual content about Joseph Ratzinger. This seems to me to be more a comparative piece on the differences in the papacies of John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
While I do not recommend that this book be read as anyone's sole source on the life and work of Joseph Ratzinger, now pope Benedict XVI, I would suggest that this be read in conjunction with other works by and about him. Perhaps it is best served with a side of Ratzinger's own "Milestones" (Ignatius, 1998) and "Introduction to Christianity" (Ignatius, 2004) as well as John Allen Jr.'s "Pope Benedict XVI: A Biography of Joseph Ratzinger" (Continuum, 2000).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
36 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
It must be tough to pen these manifestos . . ., September 18, 2007
. . . when your position within the Catholic Church has been so marginalized by the last two pontificates as to be almost non-existent.
Nevertheless, the hard Left Catholics slog on, all Sturm und Drang, sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Take David Gibson. His last book, The Coming Catholic Church, a jeremiad against the depredations of JPII, the Roman Curia, and anyone who hasn't rolled over in favor of gay marriage, women priests, and free condoms, proved to be not so prophetic after all. The Catholic Church of his fervid dreams seems no nearer materializing than a fata morgana.
Yet he presses on. Since the actual Catholic Church appears strangely resistant to his blandishments, Gibson, in this latest screed, is reduced to vague threats and more dire predictions that if she doesn't shape up and meet the radicals' demands, she may soon find herself bereft of them, a situation one struggles to find problematic. After all, there are numerous other ecclesial harbors that would welcome the hardcore dissidents, from the Unitarian Universalists to the Episcopal Church. I'm sure Gibson and his ilk would find a warm welcome among Jon Shelby Spong, for example.
Why don't they just leave? More fun, and, one supposes, more lucrative to bash the Church from the inside.
A favorite ploy of his is to trot out supposedly revelatory polls about lay persons' preferences--a symptom of his desire to transform a hierarchical Church into a liberal democracy. Well, lemme tell ya, Davy-boy: it ain't happenin'. Your project's doomed. I, for one, am thankful that the Catholic Church is constituted in such a way that progressivist rabble rousers like you can't hijack it, as has happened in numerous Protestant denominations that have caved in to radicals. As annoying as books like The Rule of Benedict are, their net effect, praise God, is practically zero.
Unreadable by anyone except those stuck in a '70s time warp, waiting for the illusive "spirit of Vatican II" to materialize.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great book for Catholics and Non-Catholics, March 14, 2007
This review is from: The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World (Hardcover)
This book by David Gibson, is a high quality work with an intelligent combination of historical accuracy and artistic description. You can immediately tell that it is written by a true Vatican "insider" with both an American and an Italian heart. It is easy to read, and gives the reader a sense of both the objectiveness of the Catholic Church (and it's newest Pope), and the depth and beautiful mystery of both. As Mr. Gibson is a convert to Catholicism, there are enough explanations that both Catholics and Non-Catholics alike will find this book easy to follow and will be able to form their own opinions. I would highly recommend this book for anyone wanting to familiarize themselves with the hierarchical Church or the role of the Church in International politics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|