22 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Caveat Emptor, March 10, 2005
This review is from: Sale of the Century: Russia's Wild Ride from Communism to Capitalism (Hardcover)
The book is somewhat entertaining, but its style is a bit too sardonic and her attitude vis-à-vis Russians is patronizing. Even Russians who, admittedly, are not my favorites characters, I feel like defending. She calls Alexander Korzhakov, an influential former head of Yeltsin's Security Service, a Russian illustration of the Peter Principal', because he `climbed to a position of power that far outstripped his intellectual resources'. Granted, Korzhakov is no Socrates, but his college degree in jurisprudence and current post of the deputy chairman of the Duma's (Russian Parliament) Defense Committee is a confirmation that perhaps behind a façade of a simpleton is hidden a smart individual. Even notorious (and wanted by the Russian government) Boris Berezovsky, whom the author calls `a jumped-up car salesman', is much more than that - a highbrow Russian `enfant terrible' with a Ph.D. in mathematics for starters.
However, the most important thing is that the book appears, as the French say, engagé. I believe this book's real purpose is to divert attention from the individuals and institutions, which are really responsible for the debacle of the Russian privatization. For one thing, she mentioned the name of Gregory Yavlinsky only once in her 360-page long book about Russian capitalist revolution and only at the end of the book. Yet, Yavlinsky, who is household name in Russia and twice-also-ran-presidential-candidate, was one of the midwives of Russian privatization. His `500 days' program was written in the late 1980s with Mikhail Gorbachev's blessing. It was supposed to transform Soviet centralized economy into a market economy by the end of 1993. Yavlinsky resigned form the government after Gorbachev rejected the program in 1990. Neither this is mentioned in the book, nor the fact the Harvard University fellows, like Graham Allison, were promoting ideas and giving intellectual impetus to Yavlinsky and Shatalin (another Russian co-author of the program).
In the late 80s and early 90s Boris Yeltsin was competing with Gorbachev for power. He decided that the road to power lies through economic radicalism. Yeltsin assembled a competing set of pet economic advisers - most famous among them were Gaidar and Chubais. These two well-educated English-speaking Russians had even more far-reaching ideas than Yavlinsky. Eventually Yeltsin prevailed over Communists, and Gaidar and Chubais moved into the government. They had their own set of Harvard intellectuals to assist and advise them, among them was the Harvard professor Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs is a very interesting figure, whose liberalism and market fundamentalism are fused into one. Freeland mentioned Sachs only once in passing (on page 75), but his personality and ideas were of paramount importance. He was the real intellectual father of Russian `shock therapy'. All in all, the Harvard advisors look to me like sort of collective `éminence grise' to the Russian privatizers of both camps (Gorbachev's and Yeltsin's). What interesting to me is the fact that the author doesn't mention Harvard in the book, except mentioning in `Acknowledgments' that the Harvard University provided her with nonresident fellowship and `stimulating environment to complete the book'.
As I see it, `shock therapy' came from the West, more precisely from the U.S., and specifically from the group of radical Harvard professors, most notably Andrei Shleifer and Jeffrey Sachs, who both were directly advising the Russian government in 1992-1993. These were the years Russia plunged into abyss. And yet, there is nothing of this in the book. There is also nothing to explain how Yegor Gaidar managed to stumble into `shock therapy' idea. He was, according to Freeland, a big fan of Samuelson's textbook `Economics', which `became his bible'. But there is nothing the textbook about `shock therapy'. Indeed I doubt that Samuelson would have approved such an outrageous idea.
Freeland's conclusion is a master stroke. She likes ideas of Richard Pipes, who was her professor at Harvard (déjà vu). These ideas in a nutshell - the tsarist, communist or re-born capitalist Russia represents hypostases of same imperialist, semi-barbaric, Asiatic despotism, which is driven by the eternal messianic zeal.
For Freeland, the free-market-through-minimum-government regime is the best economic system that Russia could have established, but the neo-Bolshevist zeal of `young reformers' spoiled the whole thing up.
With a straight face she is saying `The problem was not that the young reformers were too radical, but that they were too fanatical'. Or `I am convinced that the central failure of Russia's capitalist revolution was that it did not go far enough' (page 344). It is a folly. Shock tactics of Gaidar and his western advisers didn't work and couldn't have worked in Russia, regardless how far they would go. They caused nothing but pain and social strife. Withdrawing price control and unleashing unregulated free markets had caused a continuous 25% monthly inflation and falling industrial production of 25% per quarter (faster than during the Great Depression in America). The hyper-inflation wiped out most of people's life savings, which in combination with general decline of living standards and crumbling infrastructure, caused millions premature adult deaths in Russia through the 1990s. During this hurried transition to market democracy, Russia became a society with Third world mortality rates and First World birth rates. This should have been mentioned in the book as the real price of Russian privatization. All in all, the book feels to me like a Disney version of events, nothing more than an attempt to divert attention or may be even reassign the blame to vaguely defined by the author `Russian messianic tendencies'.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Best Analysis of post-Soviet Russia, October 7, 2000
This review is from: Sale of the Century: Russia's Wild Ride from Communism to Capitalism (Hardcover)
Compliments to Chrystia Freeland who has written a comprehensive, intelligent book on how the combination of naive reformers, corrupt officials and ambitious "oligarchs" succeeded in ripping off poor Russia of untold billions as it tried to transform itself from 70+ years of Communism to a free market economy. The West has its share of the blame with its band of greedy investment bankers and other rogues who participated in the heist of the century. An incredible story told with exceptionally clarity by Ms. Freeland , former Moscow bureau chief for the Financial Times of London. I have spoken to people who are very well informed on what is happening in Russia who unanimously support the accuracy of the book and highly recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Thorough History of Capitalist Russia, November 17, 2000
This review is from: Sale of the Century: Russia's Wild Ride from Communism to Capitalism (Hardcover)
The failure of Russia's transition to a market economy easily ranks as one of the most important stories of the 1990s. Unfortunately, while this story is important, it is not well known. In part, this must be blamed on the nature of Russia's market transition: much of it was done behind closed doors in the proverbial "smoke filled room."
This fact makes Crystia Freeland's book all the more valuable, for she, through in-depth interviews with nearly all the important players, has penetrated beyond this haze to give us the real story of the capitalist transition in Russia.
Freeland spent several years in Russia writing for the Financial Times and it shows, as her book echoes with every nuance and detail of this story. Through direct quotes, a myriad of background details, and anecdotes, the leaders of Russia's marketization are transformed from names to living, breathing entities. Furthermore, where other accounts might be satisfied to present only the most oblique facts, Freeland's book digs deep to provide the real story of what happened behind the scenes.
Although the depth of this book is certainly a strong selling point, Freeland's prose is also notable. Often gripping, never cumbersome, her prose exceptionally conveys the details of this story from her notebook to our eyes. Freeland's own analysis and insight gives us a valuable insiders' interpretation of events and adds a personal touch. Where appropriate, irreverent details are sprinkled in providing color to the story as well as quite a few shocks.
Overall, you'd be hard pressed to find a better account of Russia's market transition than the one Crystia Freeland presents in Sale of the Century.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No