Most Helpful Customer Reviews
37 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Tabloid Expose in Book Form (A True Shame), December 31, 1999
This review is from: Salinger: A Biography (Hardcover)
Paul Alexander, the author of this biography, may have a genuine admiration for J.D. Salinger, but he clearly has no true understanding of the man. This biographer's approach to Salinger's life more closely resembles a tabloid publication's expose of a pedophile priest. Aside from the differences that any group of people can have over the interpretation of any story, it seems apparent that Alexander has no clear understanding of the classic literature that Salinger loved. He lists the authors that Salinger admired, yet doesn't seem to have an awareness of the works and how they're integrated into many of Salinger's stories. The most horrifying revelation of this biography, for me, is the realization that many people especially this biographer have misinterpreted the story "Teddy." Salinger chooses his words and titles painstakingly carefully for a reason. Alexander's conclusions (as well as the public's), that Teddy kills his sister in the story, shows either his lack of awareness of what's going on or maybe he never read the story. Eventhough, the story "Teddy" was extremely successful, Salinger's disappointment to the public's reaction of the story is apparent in his story character's and alter ego, Buddy Glass', comments in "Seymour an Introduction," " ... few years ago, I published an exceptionally Haunting, Memorable, unpleasantly controversial, and thoroughly unsucessful short story about a 'gifted' little boy... " These comments alone shows Salinger's disappointment in the fact that "people just don't get it." Though, Salinger needs no defenders, I believe his fascination with young people (including and especially young women) manifests from a pure source. It is his awareness that people are most whole when they're young and not old. It is his awareness of the time in peoples lives before they accept the limits, lies, and illusions of huge institutions and the infuences of self motivated family members and friends. It is Salinger's awareness of a time when the joy of life exists in experiencing and not acquiring. This book has some interesting facts that many people may find engaging and interesting. It is an easy enough book to read and enjoy. However, the best thing you can do if you truly want to know J.D. Salinger is to just read the books he wrote. And if you want more.. Read the books Salinger read... Rilke, Shelley, Fitzgerald, Keats, etc.....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Mystery Of J.D. Salinger, October 4, 2003
Many of those who have commented on this work find author Paul Alexander to be hostile to his subject. That's not my read of it; to me, he seems more to be puzzled and saddened by the way Salinger has chosen to live his life. It could be argued that Alexander doesn't really understand Salinger; but can anyone really claim otherwise?
With Salinger, his family and past associates unwilling to cooperate on any kind of biography, Alexander has had to make do with the rather skimpy public record the world's most famous recluse has left behind. He seems to have put together as full a life story as possible, given these limitations. The perception of hostility may come from the fact that Alexander quotes extensively from the reaction of critics to Salinger's work--and sadly, for those who love it (including this reviewer)--the majority of the critics were negative about it. And Salinger's hostility to most of those in the publishing world is well-documented.
Perhaps Alexander's most intriguing contention is that Salinger, for all his public protestations of a desire to be left alone, actually wants the attention he generates. He says it's kind of a cat-and-mouse game with the public designed to maintain interest in his works.
If you're interested in learning as much detail as you can about Salinger's childhood, education, romances, buisiness dealings, and the like, this is probably the best book we'll have for some time.--William C. Hall
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing, November 15, 1999
This review is from: Salinger: A Biography (Hardcover)
Yes, I am a huge Salinger fan. I should state that from the outset. But unlike most Salinger fans, I do not believe that J.D. should be free from criticism. I wanted to admire Alexander's courage to tackle the Salinger mystique head-on. Some of his assertions, I believe, are right on the mark. Salinger IS egocentric and very much aware that he's securing literary fame (and securing continuing sales of his book) by not publishing. And I do feel that people have been too soft on Salinger. Ian Hamilton, in his previous book on Salinger, treated the author with kid gloves, eschewing details of J.D.'s private life. Alexander, however, is not afraid to ask tough--even if ultimately unanswered--questions. Why did Salinger stop publishing? Was he tired of the critical abuse? (Salinger was not treated with kid gloves by literary critics and "Hapworth 16, 1924" was greeted with universal displeasure when it appeared in the June 1965 New Yorker) Why, as one of the reviewers above noted, does Salinger toy so much with the public, leave so many clues? If Salinger wishes to be undisturbed, why does he purposely draw attention to himself. Sadly, though, Alexander's tough assertions, which the reader encounters and completely digests by page 26, give way to tepid biography, made only more tepid by the fact that the same material had been handled much more deftly in Hamilton's previous, respectful book on Salinger. In short, there's little new information here. Alexander mentions newly opened archives from the New Yorker, but one begins to wonder how much new, quality material there actually was. And so, with little to draw upon, Alexander turns to sensationalism to see his book through. Perhaps most disturbing is Alexander's shameless attempt to make a connection between Salinger's emphasis on young people in his fiction and a personal penchant for young girls. Alexander even goes so far as to link Salinger's name with Lewis Carroll. True, Salinger has dated younger women. But to link him with a literary figure whose name has become synonomous with pedophilia? This sort of stuff is more suited, say, for a daytime talk show. We live in a tabloid world. It should come as little surprise that one writer's desire to live unmolested by the media--whether the motive is sincere or not--matters little. Salinger: A Biography will make the perfect holiday gift for those who like their biographies juicy!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|