| |||||||||||||||
|
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
The book is about 250 pages long. It's well-organized, moving from Old Testament passages to New Testament passages in canonical order, and it's well-written. There's no index, though.
There are eight chapters and four appendixes. They cover Sodom and Gomorrah, Leviticus 18 and 20, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6, 1 Timothy 1, Romans 6:14, and some other topics. The arguments of people like Daniel Helminiak, John Boswell, Letha Scanzoni and Virginia Mollenkott, L. William Countryman, and Choon-Leong Seow are cited and refuted. Relevant passages of scripture are quoted and discussed, followed by a discussion of pro-homosexual arguments. I noticed that some of the material cited is as recent as last year (2001). There's a lot of recent, up-to-date material in this book. White and Niell effectively refute the pro-homosexual arguments, with a lot of attention to detail, though there are some arguments I'd like to add to their case and I sometimes disagreed with their emphasis. Overall, though, their arguments are convincing and much better than the arguments of the pro-homosexual movement.
Basically, the pro-homosexual side of this dispute does three things:
1.) Dismiss as insignificant the absence of any approval of homosexuality in hundreds of Biblical passages about marriage, sex, etc.
2.
... Read more ›White and Neill have rightly felt called to put pen to paper and attempt a formal response to what they feel is the increasing decibal level of those within the church who are urging a legitimization of homosexuality within Christianity. I agree with the authors that this is a challenge that deserves an answer, and I applaud the authors for stepping into the middle of what is becoming a warzone where this issue is ground zero.
In this book, the authors attempt to accomplish two basic things. They seek, through their own exegesis, to maintain the traditional Christian view regarding homosexuality - this it is incompatible with the Bible's teachings. Second, they attempt to critique many of the arguments that have recently been made by more liberal Christians advocating compatibility between Christianity and 'modern day monogamous homosexual intimacy'. In both of these areas, the authors hit on some good points and produce some sustained strengths. But in the end, I felt that the authors came up short too often, thus the less than flattering review I'm giving it.
Among the sustained strengths of the book are the identification of Biblical hermeneutics and authority as being the core issue of debate. White and Neill rightly emphasize that Biblical authority is really what's on trial in this debate, and do a good job of demonstrating that apologists for homosexual legitimacy within Christianity are forced to adopt an inconsistent and very weak Bibliology that necessarily discounts entire sections of the Bible.
... Read more ›At this point I wish to disagree with the several reviewers before me (from Virginia and Canada) who criticized the book. As far as not answering all homosexual arguments, the writer from Virginia lists two:
1) Jesus did not mention homosexuality (well, they basically answered this when they said that not everything is listed in the Bible, i.e. pediaphilia, Trinity, etc. Just because something is not specifically named does not make it wrong if the principle is there. The gospels don't specifically have Jesus naming many things as wrong, though he certainly would have thought they were);
2) The issue of the "love" shared between Jonathan and David. (There is absolutely nothing in the context of the relationship between these men to hint at anything erotic between them; it seems to be such a ludicrous argument that it hardly needs a response.)
As far as the argument that the authors already had their minds up and did not take the scripture to heart--as the critique from Canada says--this is an unbelievable statement! Everything about The Same Sex Controversy deals with scripture. It is up to the pro-homosexual advocate to show where in scripture the Bible endorses or promotes homosexual behavior. Besides inuendo and far stretches, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the biblical commands were not meant for all time, such as for today.
For those who want answers in response to the homosexual agenda, I would recommend The Same Sex Controversy. The only thing the book lacks is a scripture index in the back.
... Read more ›