Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate [Paperback]

Robert M. Baird (Editor), Stuart E. Rosenbaum (Editor)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback $21.98  
Paperback, April 1997 --  

Book Description

April 1997
Should government sanction gay marriages? Same-Sex Marriage offers a balanced group of essays by those involved in the struggle, as well as social commentators, scholars, and others who have addressed what could be one of the most significant debates in history.


Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

Late last year, the Hawaiian circuit court ruled that the state had no compelling justification for denying gay and lesbian couples the right to wed. The decision opened up what may be the social debate of the decade, and these two titles help to bring the arguments into sharper focus. Same-Sex Marriage, Pro and Con begins with an historically enlightening essay by Sullivan, fomer New Republic editor, whose book on gays and the gay rights movement (Virtually Normal, LJ 9/15/95) shot one of the first broadsides about the same-sex marriage issue. Sullivan explains how this latest "assault" on family values is simply the latest in an ongoing evolution of the marriage institution, from ancient real estate deals to the present-day spiritual bonding of intimates. Other essayists discuss the various arguments from historic, religious, legal, and public-policy points of view. From Plato to Ann Landers, society's experts and pundits, academics and politicians present their views. By contrast, Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate is authored mainly by professors and journalists, giving this title a drier, more academic tone. Oddly, the book also exhibits more polar oppositions and extremist views on the subject. The focus strays somewhat from the marriage theme and includes articles on counseling same-sex couples and even making the case for discrimination based on sexual orientation itself. For smaller collections that may need only one title on the subject, Sullivan's work is by far the better choice, given the depth and breadth of its coverage. Academic and larger libraries will probably want both titles.?Jeffery Ingram, Newport P.L., Ore.
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 242 pages
  • Publisher: Prometheus Books (April 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1573921297
  • ISBN-13: 978-1573921299
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.7 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,521,550 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent assortment of readings, December 21, 2004
By 
A. M. Vincent (Glasgow, Scotland) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
While this book does not have as many readings as Andrew Sullivan's _Gay Marriage: Pro and Con_, and while several of the readings exist in both books, it does contain much more scholarly information, such as court decisions and theological papers pertaining to the same-sex marriage debate. In addition to pieces such as Daniel Maguire's lengthy essay, "The Morality of Homosexual Marriage," which includes a fascinating introduction to the theory of probabilism (a theory which I have seen fit to wholeheartedly adopt in my own ethical writings), it also provides equally reasoned and researched arguments from the detractors of same-sex marriage, which I have been hard pressed to find elsewhere, that position having been mostly presented as self-evident.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars just a starting point, February 15, 2004
This review is from: Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate (Paperback)
The debate regarding same-sex marriages appears as if it will be a huge issue in 2004. For example,at the courthouse in San Francisco performed over 400 marriages (same sex) on February 14, 2004. They normally only perform a little over 400 weddings (opposite sex) a month. This means that many gay couples are committed to each other and want to make it legal in the eyes of the law.

This book takes many point of views - some extremists that feel same-sex marriage will ruin their own heterosexual marriages. Lesbians who feel that the idea of marriage is outdated and repressive to the females involved in it. And some folks who seem to have given this issue a bit more thought and express their viewpoints well.

No matter where you stand on this important issue, you will find an essay that will reflect your view. I would suggest you also read the other essays to find out how other people feel about the issue so when it comes down to debating this hot topic, you will know the various opinions of your supporters as well as your opponents. You'll be able to state your case in a way that should be able to get your point across. I recommend this book highly.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars not quite in the condition described, May 14, 2009
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate (Paperback)
Listed as "like new", the book was previously an unused library book. But it still had stamps in it and location numbers taped on the spine. Refunded $1...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
On December 3,1996, Circuit Court Judge Kevin Chang declared, in Baehr v. Miike, that Hawaii's refusal to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples violated that state's constitution. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
New York, United States, Hawaii Constitution, Virtually Normal, Andrew Sullivan, Fourteenth Amendment, Law Review, San Francisco, Defense of Marriage Act, The Male Couple, New Republic, Paula Ettelbrick, Thomas Stoddard, Judge Burns, Los Angeles, Richard Mohr, Documents of Vatican, Harvard University Press, John Boswell, Perry Miller, Bill of Rights, Blest Be the Ties That Bind, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Holy Spirit, Journal of Social Philosophy
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:



Books on Related Topics (learn more)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(7)
(3)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject