|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Overkill? Not!,
By GC (Toronto) - See all my reviews
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
Uh, I think anyone who's reasonably up-to-date with today's digicams knows that a 96MB CF card can be filled easily. Assuming each 1600x1200 shot taken with a 2 megapixer occupies 1MB of memory, you will only be able to get 96 pictures on the card. With today's 3 megapixers, it just makes it seem THAT much smaller. That's why we have the 340MB microdrive nowadays. 1GB storage media the size of a CF or memory stick already exists. Anyone who claims that they have trouble filling up a 96MB card on a vacation must be using a 300,000 pixel, first-generation digicam.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
no such thing as too much memory,
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
is there such a thing as too much memory? i think not. this product deserves more than one star. san disk has a great reputation and i've never had problems with any of their flash memory. if you don't need that much memory, get a smaller capacity card.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Definitely not overkill! I bought two!,
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
Even for a 3.34 megapixel point-and-shoot digital camera (e.g. Nikon 990), this 96MB card isn't overkill, considering when each image is about 1MB at 2048x1536 at highest JPEG quality. Uncompressed TIFF files are 9MB _each_, although they're painfully slow to save. So, I bought two, and I'm thinking about getting a third one for longer trips.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Take Two, they're small (and geting smaller),
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
I now have 3 SanDisk CF cards that I use between digital cameras and a Windows Pocket PC. The oldest (15 MB) is well over 4 years old and I've found them all to be reliable and worked in a broad variety of cameras, readers, and PC Card laptops. With my 2 Mpixel camera set to uncompressed TIFF, each shot takes 5MB, so I bought a second 96MB card. Complaints? make 'em cheaper and faster (a 5MB write takes a l-o-n-g time).
9 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
OVERKILL,
By Kyle J. Tasker (Northwood, NH United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
The item was absolutely positively wonderful, except for onehorrid flaw, its tooooooooooo darn big, i went on vacation and tookpictures every time i got a chance for an entire month, WITHOUT changing the card, and when i got home i still had 25 megs left over, i easily got 500 super-high res shots out of it and four times that in normal quality. its just a waste unless your pre-occupied with size(hmm sounds familiar)
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Out of stock
| ||