Customer Reviews


5 Reviews
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Overkill? Not!
Uh, I think anyone who's reasonably up-to-date with today's digicams knows that a 96MB CF card can be filled easily. Assuming each 1600x1200 shot taken with a 2 megapixer occupies 1MB of memory, you will only be able to get 96 pictures on the card. With today's 3 megapixers, it just makes it seem THAT much smaller. That's why we have the 340MB microdrive nowadays...
Published on March 25, 2000 by GC

versus
9 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars OVERKILL
The item was absolutely positively wonderful, except for onehorrid flaw, its tooooooooooo darn big, i went on vacation and tookpictures every time i got a chance for an entire month, WITHOUT changing the card, and when i got home i still had 25 megs left over, i easily got 500 super-high res shots out of it and four times that in normal quality. its just a waste unless...
Published on March 17, 2000 by Kyle J. Tasker


Most Helpful First | Newest First

13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Overkill? Not!, March 25, 2000
By 
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
Uh, I think anyone who's reasonably up-to-date with today's digicams knows that a 96MB CF card can be filled easily. Assuming each 1600x1200 shot taken with a 2 megapixer occupies 1MB of memory, you will only be able to get 96 pictures on the card. With today's 3 megapixers, it just makes it seem THAT much smaller. That's why we have the 340MB microdrive nowadays. 1GB storage media the size of a CF or memory stick already exists. Anyone who claims that they have trouble filling up a 96MB card on a vacation must be using a 300,000 pixel, first-generation digicam.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars no such thing as too much memory, March 28, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
is there such a thing as too much memory? i think not. this product deserves more than one star. san disk has a great reputation and i've never had problems with any of their flash memory. if you don't need that much memory, get a smaller capacity card.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Definitely not overkill! I bought two!, July 7, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
Even for a 3.34 megapixel point-and-shoot digital camera (e.g. Nikon 990), this 96MB card isn't overkill, considering when each image is about 1MB at 2048x1536 at highest JPEG quality. Uncompressed TIFF files are 9MB _each_, although they're painfully slow to save. So, I bought two, and I'm thinking about getting a third one for longer trips.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Take Two, they're small (and geting smaller), July 6, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
I now have 3 SanDisk CF cards that I use between digital cameras and a Windows Pocket PC. The oldest (15 MB) is well over 4 years old and I've found them all to be reliable and worked in a broad variety of cameras, readers, and PC Card laptops.

With my 2 Mpixel camera set to uncompressed TIFF, each shot takes 5MB, so I bought a second 96MB card.

Complaints? make 'em cheaper and faster (a 5MB write takes a l-o-n-g time).

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars OVERKILL, March 17, 2000
By 
Kyle J. Tasker (Northwood, NH United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: SanDisk 96 MB CompactFlash Card (SDCFB-96-144) (Personal Computers)
The item was absolutely positively wonderful, except for onehorrid flaw, its tooooooooooo darn big, i went on vacation and tookpictures every time i got a chance for an entire month, WITHOUT changing the card, and when i got home i still had 25 megs left over, i easily got 500 super-high res shots out of it and four times that in normal quality. its just a waste unless your pre-occupied with size(hmm sounds familiar)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product