Santorum loves Jesus he would french kiss him and it wouldn't even be gay


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-19 of 19 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 20, 2012 12:32:18 PM PDT
Boomy says:
...yea rock on...

In reply to an earlier post on Mar 20, 2012 3:36:39 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Mar 20, 2012 3:38:54 PM PDT
W. Westphal says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Mar 20, 2012 3:46:11 PM PDT
J. Potter says:
... and Gingrich .... and Santorum ... and Obama. Other than that, Paul is in like Flynn.

Which leads me to say thank you, Gingrich, Santorum, Romney, and Obama, for keeping Paul at bay.

And thank you, Santorum, Romney, and Obama, for keeping Gingrich at bay.

And thank you, Romney, and Obama, for keeping Gingrich at bay.

And thank you, Obama, for keeping Romney at bay.

Now just need an improvement on Obama.

Posted on Apr 5, 2012 11:58:11 AM PDT
Boomy says:
bump...

Posted on Apr 6, 2012 4:05:30 PM PDT
Bubba says:
Uh, yeah, no matter what he says, it would be gay.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 7, 2012 8:06:58 AM PDT
W. Westphal says:
Idiotic. Paul is the ONLY one who is a good choice. He voted against the Patriot Act, showing that he is willing to vote against people from his own party if it is the right thing. He voted against all the bailouts and he voted against the War on Terror. He never voted to raise taxes, allowing Americans to keep more of their money, which is especially important in tough economic times. The Fed caused the Great Depression years ago, and it has caused the current Depression.

And you mentioned Gingrich being kept at bay twice. He's not that big. I think you meant Santorum for one of those. ;)

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 7, 2012 8:31:02 AM PDT
J. Potter says:
Was posted back when Gingrich was leading Santorum. Soooo long ago. So hard for the people to choose between their nuts. They finally settled on the one they can most identify with.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 7, 2012 7:14:05 PM PDT
W. Westphal says:
Ther difference between Santorum and Gingrich is that Santorum is a pawn and Gingrich is a hypocrite. And Romney is both.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 11, 2012 10:26:08 AM PDT
J. Potter says:
Well, guess what? You're stuck with "both."

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 11, 2012 4:55:12 PM PDT
Sophist says:
"The Fed caused the Great Depression years ago, and it has caused the current Depression. "

Oy, gevalt.

No. Just no.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 12, 2012 3:41:35 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 12, 2012 3:42:23 PM PDT
W. Westphal says:
Yes, Romney the RINO. Tis too bad.

Sophist: What no????

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 12, 2012 4:03:04 PM PDT
J. Potter says:
Hey, here in Okieland, we have DINOs. It happens.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 15, 2012 3:23:52 AM PDT
Sophist says:
Enn. Oh.

No.

How can I make this clearer?

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 16, 2012 3:16:49 PM PDT
W. Westphal says:
Simple. Are you denying that the Fed caused the Great Depression of the past or the one in the present or both?I might have exagerated when I said that it caused it, but it sure didn't help! It is an established fact that they contributed to the one in the past. I never met someone who argued that it didn't.

The economy thrived during the 1920's, but lots of this had to do with easy credit. The Federal Reserve kept interest rates low, making it easy for corporations and individuals to take loans to buy homes, cars, and appliances on installment plans. They didn't have to pay the full price of an item, all they had to do was pay a small down payment and then pay monthly installments over a set period of time. As long as this could happen, jobs were plentiful. As buisinesses prospered in the 1920's, stock dividends soared, and many people invested in stocks, driving stock prices higher every day. The Federal Reserve had kept had kept interest rates low and had encouraged expansion of the money supply. But by 1930, an expanded money supply was very badly needed to aid banks that could not meet obligations, the Fed acted to contract the money supply. And the result was multiplication of bank failures and the loss of millions of savings and a deepeni0ng of the Depression. In this way, the Fed did the opposite of what it set out to do.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 10:35:26 AM PDT
Fantastic says:
W. Westphal,
The depression that started in 1929 was WORLDWIDE. So, are you saying that the feds in the US caused the collapse of the economy in the rest of the world? Are you also blaming the feds for WWII because the collapse of the German economy was one of the main causes of Hitler's rise to power.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 11:23:40 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 17, 2012 11:32:22 PM PDT
Sophist says:
"Are you denying that the Fed caused the Great Depression of the past or the one in the present or both?"

Both.

"I might have exagerated when I said that it caused it, but it sure didn't help!"

No, you didn't exaggerate. You were wrong. Totally wrong. You flatly stated that the FED was responsible for both the Great Depression and the current financial situation, and that simply is not so. The FED was not a major cause of either event. It may have exacerbated the results of the events, but the actual causes lie elsewhere.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 21, 2012 8:11:27 AM PDT
W. Westphal says:
No, the Fed was not responsible for the WORLDWIDE one. But it did make the Depression much worse in America.

Posted on Apr 30, 2012 9:22:06 AM PDT
Boomy says:
he also loves Lindsey Lohan now...

Posted on Jun 1, 2012 10:00:42 AM PDT
Boomy says:
Sluuurrrpppp!
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  6
Total posts:  19
Initial post:  Mar 20, 2012
Latest post:  Jun 1, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions
This discussion is about
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President by Jerome R. Corsi (Hardcover - 2011)
3.5 out of 5 stars   (307)