|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Compelling Critique,
By Hollywood Gourmand "Hollywood Gourmand" (Baltimore, MD United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: How Legal Training and Law Reviews Distort Constitutional Meaning (Hardcover)
Interesting critique of the often 'shaky' nature of law journal
scholarship and writing, spotlighting topics that have been embraced by the political Right. Someone with comparable gravitas should be inspired to use Spitzer's engaging format to expose the glut of Progressive overreaching that crowds these journals as well. His section debunking the "individualist" interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is the main flaw here, and displays a tendency toward the kind of dismissive, politically-biased scholarship that he opposes so successfully elsewhere in this work (and robs this review of two stars). I need to go back and check just how many of the "collectivist school" Second Amendment law journal articles cited were actually bankrolled by the Joyce Foundation and other gun control advocacy groups. |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: How Legal Training and Law Reviews Distort Constitutional Meaning by Robert J. Spitzer (Paperback - April 7, 2008)
$30.00
In Stock | ||