From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Environmental ethicist Holmes Rolston III, grandfather of the global environmental movement, has spent his life reconciling scientific study with Judeo-Christian religious teachings. Rolston's former student Preston (Grounding Knowledge) synthesizes Rolston's writing, extensive interviews, and a deep knowledge of the history and influence of Rolston's work for a satisfying biography. As a seminary student at Richmond, Virginia's Davidson College, and a doctoral candidate at the University of Edinburgh, Preston began developing a contrary view of Protestant Reformed theology, rejecting predestination and emphasizing the concept of God's grace. He was forced out of his first pastoral assignment over his "modern" views on natural history; settling in Bristol, Virginia, with a more educated congregation, he returned whenever possible to the nature studies of his school years, preaching against the industrialization of Appalachia and the "dominion interpretation" of scripture: "Nature's real value was as something living and dynamic... in its ongoing creativity." After leaving his pastorate to study the philosophy of science, he made his academic breakthrough with his first professional paper, 1975's "Is There an Ecological Ethic?" This lively intellectual biography fully examines the biblical and academic traditions from which Rolston's philosophy developed, and the world-wide movement which developed from it.
The philosophy profession generally credits Holmes Rolston III, an emeritus professor of Colorado State University, with originating the field of environmental ethics. This work charts Rolston’s journey in nonacademic language, paying particular attention to the development of his conception that the natural world possesses an intrinsically moral content, an idea that dovetailed with the popularization of environmentalism from the 1960s onward. As Preston describes, in that decade Rolston, then a Presbyterian minister, recognized that philosophies of science and religion drew him more than did his vocation. Following circumstances of a career shift that deposited him at CSU, Rolston systematized his ideas in several books , acquired a public profile in several conservation campaigns in Colorado, and in 2003 received the ultimate encomium in the scholarship of science and religion, the Templeton Prize. Preston ably and clearly exposes readers interested in what environmental ethics mean to their fundamentals, to the arc of Rolston’s life, and to critiques of his theology-tinged appreciation for the beauty and regenerative power of nature.