Saving God: Religion after Idolatry and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
  • List Price: $20.95
  • Save: $4.72 (23%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 9 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
Saving God: Religion afte... has been added to your Cart
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Sold by textbookspro
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Book is in overall good condition!! Cover shows some edge wear and corners are lightly worn. Pages have a minimal to moderate amount of markings. FAST SHIPPING W/USPS TRACKING!!!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Saving God: Religion after Idolatry Paperback – July 31, 2011

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$10.50 $8.53
$16.23 FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Only 9 left in stock (more on the way). Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Saving God: Religion after Idolatry + Surviving Death (Carl G. Hempel Lecture)
Price for both: $32.67

Buy the selected items together


Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 216 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press (July 31, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0691152616
  • ISBN-13: 978-0691152615
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #951,627 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews


Winner of the 2010 Award for Excellence in Religion: Constructive-Reflective Studies, American Academy of Religion

One of Choice's Outstanding Academic Titles for 2010

"The non-fiction book I most enjoyed this year might be a stocking-stuffer for both atheists and believers (it is slightly more likely to appeal to the former, but would certainly intrigue believers willing to think about their belief). It is Saving God: Religion After Idolatry (Princeton University Press), by the Princeton philosopher Mark Johnston. This book demolishes, with far greater precision and elegance than anything by Richard Dawkins."--James Wood, New Yorker

"Outstanding."--Alan Wolfe, National Interest

"This accessible, sophisticated, and thoughtful work will be an important addition to collections of both philosophy and theology."--Choice

"[A]n astonishing book. . . . [A] daring blend of human depth and philosophical originality."--Tony Coady, Australian Book Review

"Saving God is a rich and provocative book. . . . I found Saving God to be original, complex and insightful. However one reacts to Johnston's naturalistic reinterpretation of Christianity and the other monotheisms, one may still applaud his rejection of idolatrous uses of religion to serve human ends."--Lynne Rudder Baker, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

"This witty and philosophically subtle book is . . . very Maimonidean in its thoroughgoing rejection of superstition and idolatry as an offense to true religion."--Menachem Kellner, Jewish Review of Books

"Surviving Death and Saving God both provided me with intellectual pleasure of a high order, even though I found many of the author's conclusions false and some morally repugnant. Johnston is the kind of atheist it's good for Christians to read, because he is intelligent, intellectually energetic, and serious about what he engages, and because he shows very clearly just where fastidiousness leads."--Paul J. Griffiths, Commonweal

"Saving God: Religion after Idolatry is a brilliant book: erudite, intriguing and inventive. Anyone interested in the concept of God and the relationship between religion and naturalism will want to read it."--Allen Stairs, Philosophy in Review

"[Surviving Death and Saving God] constitute a remarkably thorough and convincing treatment of two extremely important religious issues, those of the perennial allurements of idolatry and the deeply menacing fact of death, to say nothing of the books' endorsement and defense of an arduous but richly inspiring ideal of the religious life. The books are a welcome corrective for some of the most seductive and prevalent distortions of religious thought and practice. I heartily recommend them to the reader who relishes a bountifully laid, religiously nourishing, and deeply satisfying philosophical feast."--Donald A. Crosby, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

From the Inside Flap

"This book is a brilliantly conceived contribution to natural theology. Taken together with Johnstons forthcoming Surviving Death, it constitutes the most interesting and provocative elaboration of religious naturalism since Santayana."--Jeffrey Stout, author of Democracy and Tradition and Ethics after Babel

"This is a remarkable, fascinating, and important book, one that exhibits rich philosophical erudition--which it wears lightly--and startling philosophical insight. It is, at its core, a work of natural theology, a distinctly philosophical endeavor, but the book neatly sidesteps all the dead ends that such a project has created for itself in the last couple of centuries."--James C. Edwards, author of The Plain Sense of Things: The Fate of Religion in an Age of Normal Nihilism

"This is one of those rare works in philosophical theology that presents a complex, novel view in a manner accessible to the general reader. This is an exciting book."--Andrew Chignell, Cornell University

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.6 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

13 of 14 people found the following review helpful By DCCHEF on March 24, 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Johnston constructs an interesting if idiosyncratic argument which arrives at a Spinoza-like destination. Johnston is a philosopher at Princeton; this work, however, is not a philosophy book per se, but an extended essay (with some philosophical and theological elements). In it, Johnston's goal is to try to criticize traditional religions on their own terms and see where this leads him. He assumes there is a God (a "highest one") worthy of our fealty and the source of a path toward some kind of salvation. He then wants to strip away everything from traditional religious practice which can be criticized as arbitrary, idolatrous, or inappropriately focused on ego or worldly interests. He finds this eliminates supernatural entities and interventions, idiosyncratic historical trappings, the afterlife, and on and on. What's left is a panentheistic vision of reality. This is a provocative and interesting book. (To a previous reviewer's point, it's not a very easy read, but if you have read some academic philosophy and theology, I think you're OK).
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful By E.L.B. on March 2, 2010
Format: Hardcover
A friend of mine suggested Johnston to me after I told him how I was converted to atheism by reading the likes of Dawkins, Harris, etc. Now I see why he did after having read it a few weeks back since he addresses them as naive...representing the 'new atheism' but recycling old arguments and holding an ignorant view of 'religion'; a version of religion which Johnston calls 'idolatry'. He condemns all the major monotheisms as idolatrous because they incorporate to some degree an element of superstition in the form of supernaturalism. He instead advocates a 'religious naturalism'. He elaborates this as panentheism (not 'pantheism', but similar): 'It is by encouraging its adherents to attend to the self-disclosure of Being rather than placate another god, that panentheism distinguishes itself from the idolatrous religions.' [125] In his view there are no random incursions into the natural realm made inexplicably by nonmaterial beings. This 'legitimate naturalism' means just that there are no 'gods of the gaps'. The 'doings' of non-spatiotemporal entities have their own nomology that works in and through the physical world. This doesn't mean that there is only physical reality, but that beyond it is 'the realm of sense, the realm of that in virtue of which things are intelligible.' [127] Chapters 3 and 8 and 11 are among the most important.

There are probably many things to find disagreeable with his thesis, but I think it's something worth looking into, especially for 'Richard-Dawkins-rules!' kinds of atheists. The sequel, Surviving Death, is probably worth a try after reading this too.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful By chaliapin on September 4, 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Mark Johnston reveals himself to be a brilliant philosopher in this very unique and spirited critique of religion. He sets forth a thoroughgoing religious naturalism that leads to a quite original conception of the Divine, which is termed panentheism. I am no theologian myself, and while I gather that the term "panentheism" itself is not new, and Johnston seems to arrive at a place that is very reminiscent of Heidegger and Tillich in many respects, what sets this book apart for me is the quality of the philosophical argument. He is obviously a master of the philosophical canon, not only able to bring to bear themes from nearly every branch of philosophy, but also able to radically break from the philosophical traditions when he feels it is warranted. Johnston also has an uncanny ability to find exactly the right way to precisely phrase a philosophical view or objection, even when dealing with very abstract concepts. Throughout, the writing is lively and fresh, and the arguments are continually surprising and insightful.

Many without philosophical training may find sections of the book tough going, even though the book does not aspire to full philosophical rigor and Johnston tries to avoid jargon. However, for those with some background I would hold this up as a paragon of style. Even if you don't agree with the overall conclusions of the book, there are valuable insights to be gained in every chapter. I myself found much of it quite compelling and plan to re-read many chapters in it.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By J. H. McKenna on March 11, 2014
Format: Paperback
Here's the recipe: after any atheistic critique seriously damages some image of God, theists tactically re-image God and claim that atheists were all along sophomoric and naive in their critique.

What Johnston should say is, "Hume, D'Holbach, Dawkins, Hitchens, Michael Martin, and other atheists have devastated one particular image of God. But long live God! Because I, Mark Johnston, offer a new image of God, one that flutters so high above critique that it remains insusceptible to critique."

The method is as old as liberal theology: redefine the terms in order to dodge the darts of criticism. God? Certainly Johnston believes in God, but in the liberal fashion: God is redefined in words you never heard applied to God before in your life, words with no linear continuity with the idea of God that has existed for thousands of years.

Johnston is a full-time professional philosopher and a part-time liberal theologian attempting to revive an idea that he himself long ago deemed incredible.

Like all liberal theologians, he is pleased with himself because he has managed to dream up a version of God that he, a hyper-educated liberal theologian, can believe.

The old version of God, bruised and breathless and possibly dead from 200 years of critique, ceased to be a viable option for Johnston, probably in his second year of graduate school.

Read this book as an example of a liberal theologian's sleight of hand. It's instructive for that reason.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?