Customer Reviews

School Discipline and School Violence: The Teacher Variance Approach

5 star:		(0)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

As a person who values options in discipline, this book is terrrifc because the author aligns major theoretical perspectives with reasons for a child's behavior or misbehavior. Dr. I. Hyman, a reputable child psychologist/researcher, describes useful methods which can help both parents and teachers identify their own patterns of discipline, which may or may not include techniques such as punishment. I like the book for what it is; a no non-sense approach to understanding how and why, we as teachers or parents, respond the way we do to a child's behavior. Hyman provides some terrific scenarios demonstrating these approaches. Also, folks who highly support the right to hit their children may not like what the author has to say since he provides other options for discipline, including reinforcement, investigation of the environmental setting, and understanding WHY a child behaves a certain way. This info is useful since professionals in the medical and psychological professions agree (as is seen in their organizational position statements) that there is little place for corporal punishment in our schools. It's worth it to take a look at other options which have proven to be more effective, and this book provides a curious, open-minded reader with an opportunity to do so.

After reading this book, one can not help but see that is a biased view of discipline. It only gives the author's point of view without giving attention to the other side of the issue. He is strongly against corporal punishment and gives false accusations about using corporal punishment as a disciplinarian method. After further investigation of this author Hyman, it is plain to see that his main agenda is to abolish parents' and teachers' rights to discipline children as they deem necessary. Further, the norms he uses in the Teacher Variance Survey, should not accurately be the norms. Because he does not use enough respondents(only 608) to accurately represent the vast number of educators that work with children in the nation.