In their Introduction, Carlson and Longman III note that "Many Christians are torn between their belief in the creation narrative in the Bible and the conclusions of contemporary science, views that seem irreconcilable" (p. 11). The authors then set out to demonstrate that Science and the Christian faith do not have to be or remain enemies.
This thesis is developed through the seven chapters that make up this well-written though short title: Chapter 1: "Theological and Scientific Sources and Their Interpretation." Before mentioning in brief that Genesis 1-11 must be situated within the ancient Near Eastern writings of ancient Israel's neighbors (p. 26), the authors give an orientation of the rise of Creationism and the many competing views as a result of Darwin's The Origin of the Species in 1859. Chapter 2: "Characteristics of Theology and Science Relevant to the Conflict." "Christian theology seeks truth, and like science, wants to offer a truthful understanding of the universe and all that occurs in the universe" (p. 34). The authors also noted that Scripture plays the "primary and indispensable role in theology" (p. 35). They go on to quote both the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978) and the Fuller Theological Seminary statement of faith on Scripture, to affirm the Bible's role in Christian faith and theology. The limitations of both theology and science are duly noted (pp. 45-46). Chapter 3: "Biblical Interpretation: A Key Element in Resolving the Creation-Evolution Conflict." The authors begin the chapter: "This chapter arises from our conviction of the importance of carefully interpreting the Bible nd applying a good interpretive method to biblical passages that address creation" (p. 51). The three main components to contemporary biblical hermeneutics are duly noted and treated: the author--the text--the reader (pp. 53-56). Of special note is the subheading "Genre--A Further Word." Here the authors develop the chapter around the fact that the Bible contains a variety of literary forms, "each chosen carefully by the writer in a way that is consistent with the writer's purpose for a given passage" (p. 57). An effort is made to define "myth" with the help of such noted writers and theologians as C.S. Lewis, J.R. Tolkien, I. Howard Marshal and Grant R. Osborne (pp. 59-68). With the aid of Peter Enns recent Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament, the authors argue for both the inspirational (divine) and incarnational (human) make up of the Bible, with special focus on the literary form of Genesis 1 and 2.
Chapters 4 and 5, "Creation in the Old Testament" and "Creation in the New Testament," respectively, are included to demonstrate how both the Old and New Testament writers used the creation story to serve their theological purposes. It must be noted that these two chapters are inticipation of what the authors will say later about the ancient Hebrews' notion of worldview.
In Chapter 6: "Genesis 1:1-2:3 and Genesis 2:4-25," the authors note that while most focus on Genesis 1 as the biblical account of creation, Genesis 2 must also be factored in, to get "a complete picture of the message of creation in Genesis" (p. 107). Before addressing the similarities and differences in Genesis 1 and 2, the authors note "A simple comparison of the primeval prologue, Genesis 1-11, with other ancient literature reveals that Genesis 1-11, including the two Genesis creation passages, parallels ancient Near Eastern tradition in many ways, whereas the Genesis 12-50 patriarchal narratives and the remainder of the Pentateuch are uniquely Hebrew" (p. 112). Chapter 7: "Genesis 1 and 2 as a Worldview Statement of the Ancient People of Israel." The authors conclude the matter thus: "We have come to the point where we can suggest that Genesis 1 and 2 together constitute a worldview statement of the ancient Hebrew people, and because of the importance of this statement, these accounts are found at the beginning of the Bible... Genesis 1 and 2, in the story beneath the story, work in a complementary fashion in together presenting a coherent worldview of ancient Israel, and this is the primary reason for their being both a part of the Bible and the opening narratives of the Bible" (pp. 134-35).
The book is well-written, at a non-technical level, no doubt with a wider readership in mind. My only drawbacks to date: 1. There's no interaction with say Walton's recent The Lost World of Genesis One, which is preoccupied with the same, as it subtitle makes clear. 2. Still awaiting a clearer definition of "myth" by the authors. And 3. the authors devote about a page commending the New Living Translation.
At any rate, Science, Creation and the Bible by Carlson and Longman III is a solid addition to recent titles in the creation-evolution debate.