Science Left Behind and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
Sell Us Your Item
For a $2.00 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Science Left Behind on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left [Hardcover]

Alex Berezow , Hank Campbell
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)

Buy New
$19.62 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
Rent
$12.68
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
In Stock.
Rented by RentU and Fulfilled by Amazon.
Want it Tuesday, May 21? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $12.99  
Hardcover $19.62  
Paperback $15.19  
Amazon.com Textbooks Store
Shop the Amazon.com Textbooks Store and save up to 70% on textbook rentals, 90% on used textbooks and 60% on eTextbooks.

Book Description

September 12, 2012 1610391640 978-1610391641
To listen to most pundits and political writers, evolution, stem cells, and climate change are the only scientific issues worth mentioning—and the only people who are anti-science are conservatives. Yet those on the left have numerous fallacies of their own. Aversion to clean energy programs, basic biological research, and even life-saving vaccines come naturally to many progressives. These are positions supported by little more than junk-science and paranoid thinking.

Now for the first time, science writers Dr. Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell have drawn open the curtain on the left’s fear of science. As Science Left Behind reveals, vague inclinations about the wholesomeness of all things natural, the unhealthiness of the unnatural, and many other seductive fallacies have led to an epidemic of misinformation. The results: public health crises, damaging and misguided policies, and worst of all, a new culture war over basic scientific facts—in which the left is just as culpable as the right.


Frequently Bought Together

Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left + The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science- and Reality
Price for both: $37.60

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

Michael Medved, nationally syndicated talk radio host, author of THE 10 BIG LIES ABOUT AMERICA
“Entertaining, enlightening and important. This valuable book should shatter the left's smug certainty that science registers as a partisan Democrat. Berezow and Campbell provide persuasive evidence and argument that should reshape conventional wisdom on a wide variety of current controversies."

Kirkus
“A sophisticatedly vitriolic, somewhat tongue-in-cheek addition to the current election debate.”

Publishers Weekly
“Their nonpartisan message is clear: Washington as a whole is woefully uninformed when it comes to the scientific underpinnings of pertinent topics like stem cell research, green energy, organic food, vaccines, and gender issues."

Huntington News
“Groundbreaking…If I were teaching journalism, this is a book that I would require my students to read and absorb -- and keep for reference.”

The Progressive Contrarian
“A no-nonsense, sometimes brutal and sometimes funny book that progressives should read.”

Red, Green, and Blue.org
“Anyone who talks for very long with a genuine American leftist -- as opposed to the vastly more numerous moderate liberals -- can quickly see that romantic-nostalgic spite toward science and technology is not the sole province of Fox-watchers."

PolicyMic
“The people who are skeptical of the benefits of vaccination or think that organic food is healthier will undoubtedly find [Science Left Behind] problematic. And they should. The prominent activists and politicians highlighted in this book are spreading misinformation and causing serious harm in some cases, and it's good to see scientists and science writers making some noise about it. You should read what they have to say. Go buy this book.”

Wall Street Journal
“In Science Left Behind, journalists Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell show that conservatives hardly have a monopoly on motivated reasoning, usefully revealing how pervasive scientific misinformation is in progressive arguments on organic and genetically modified foods, clean energy, nuclear waste and other matters.”

Forbes
“Alex Berezow and Hank Campbell, co-authors of Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left, make a nuanced and convincing counter argument: Ludditism is not a partisan issue. In fact, on many of the most critical issues of our time, the “progressive” perspective is often rooted in out-dated, anti-empirical, junk science paradigms that threaten innovation—and are beginning to unnerve the most scientifically minded thinkers on the left….This soft conspiracy, promoted by mainstream Democrats, infects a broad array of science issues and highlights the religious-like iconic beliefs of the left (as Kloor has noted): Nature is sacred, big business is dangerous and corrupt, technology can cause more problems than it helps solve, the world is on the verge of an eco-apocalypse, and we need more precaution, regulation and legislation. I call it enviro-romanticism, a criticism documented in distressing detail in Science Left Behind…Read Science Left Behind. It’s a clarion call for the empirically minded amongst us regardless of your ideological persuasion.”

Booklist
“There are a lot of hot-button topics here: environmentalism, genetically modified organisms, organic food, product testing on animals, solar power, clean energy, and more. The authors explore the issues in detail, working very hard to give the appearance of political neutrality, and the book does an excellent job of opening readers’ minds to the possibility that these issues aren’t as cut-and-dried as they might have been led to believe by politicians and the media. Open-minded readers, those who don’t mind being asked to reassess their long-held beliefs, should find much here to think about and debate.

Commentary Magazine
“Alex  B.  Berezow  and  Hank  Campbell  are  on  solid ground  in  Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left…Their  arguments  slice  quickly  and  powerfully,  supported  by  the kinds of skillfully chosen facts…Science Left Behind does much-needed work in drawing attention to what the authors  call  the  “feel-good  fallacies”  that constitute the worldviews of so many on the left—often the very individuals who proudly claim membership in the “reality-based com-munity.” More important, Berezow and Campbell articulate a valuable observation that deserves constant reiterating:  with  great  frequency, politics  invites  us  to  inhabit  an imaginary world populated by fictions  that  conform  to  our  desires about how things ought to be.”

San Francisco Book Review
Science Left Behind challenges the notion that poorly informed anti-science rhetoric is solely the province of the right wing…Berezow and Campbell offer numerous examples of progressives hijacking legitimate programs and research and twisting them to suit a backwards-ass anti-science agenda. In this way, reading Science Left Behind is as infuriating as it is eye-opening. A fundamental lack of familiarity with science is rampant in government as a whole, and Science Left Behind does an impressive job drawing attention to this alarming disparity.”

Portland Mercury
“ Nevertheless, Berezow and Campbell's message is jarring and necessary. Science is vilified in American political life. People believe things because they wish to, not because of what is true. This has real-world consequences when it comes to the implementation of beneficial technology. Anti-scientism is everywhere, and acknowledging that much of it comes from our own political tribe is a hard and inconvenient truth.”

Scienceblogs.com
“This is — as far as I know — the best and first book to tackle many of these anti-science claims, and while it is not the definitive work on any of these subjects, it’s worth a read for anyone who is infuriated by claims that republicans are anti-science…[T]he book does an excellent job of bringing together a large survey of different ways that elements of the political left in America fail to heed what science has to say."

New Scientist
“There is more, and recent, antiscience fare from far-left progressives, documented in the 2012 book Science Left Behind by science journalists Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell, who note that “if it is true that conservatives have declared a war on science, then progressives have declared Armageddon….Whereas conservatives obsess over the purity and sanctity of sex, the left's sacred values seem fixated on the environment, leading to an almost religious fervor over the purity and sanctity of air, water and especially food.”

About the Author

Alex B. Berezow is the editor of RealClearScience. His work has appeared on CNN, and in USA Today, Forbes, and The Economist among other publications. In 2010, he earned a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of Washington. Originally from southern Illinois, he currently lives in Seattle.


Hank Campbell is the founder and editor of Science 2.0, the world’s largest independent science communication community. Prior to that, he was a senior executive at three physics software companies. He graduated from Duquesne University and was formerly a U.S. Army officer.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: PublicAffairs (September 12, 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1610391640
  • ISBN-13: 978-1610391641
  • Product Dimensions: 6.4 x 1.2 x 9.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #55,990 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.4 out of 5 stars
(49)
3.4 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
62 of 77 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Confession up front: I bring a bias to this review: I write on 'scientific literacy' and run a genetics program, GeneticLiteracyProject.org and therefore have little patience for activists across the ideological spectrum who see science and science journalism as a playpen for their pet ideological beliefs. I'll confess I liked the leftwing version of this book, "The Republican War on Science", because it cold bloodedly pointed out the anti-science proclivities of the religious and uber conservative right on such issues as climate change (yes, it's happening, and its a genuine threat) and evolution. Author Chris Mooney lost his wheels in his follow up book, "The Republican Brain", which veered heavily into the ideological lane, but nonetheless he did science a service with his first book. But there is lots he left out...including the sensibility of a large part of what might Hank Campbell and Alex Berezow call the "progressive left" in their refreshing new book, "Science Left Behind."

In a nutshell, this book is smart, on point and witty. Although it hits its share of bloopers, it slams an amazing number of home runs, particularly when it comes to the left's aversion for risk and/or cost benefit analysis. Fracking? It's all about the environmental damage it might cause (as there is no evidence yet it causes any actual problems) and no discussion of the geopolitical game changing role it plays, the dramatic reduction in greenhouse gasses that if offers, and the huge economic benefits. Chemicals? The things that are in every product, and have helped transform society in the twentieth century? To the left, chemicals=toxic=danger, which is junior high school level simplistic analysis, yet it permeates the views of mainstream progressive thinking, including at well-funded activist NGOs such as the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Environmental Working Group.

This book is quite fearless, taking up many subjects that are just too touchy for the hard left to even discuss in public, such as male/female differences in brain structure and performance--which everyone who has had children knows is true. Yet as they point out, careers have been ruined by litmus test activists groups for trying to discuss, in reasonable and scientific ways, what scientists discuss all the time.

They also take on the elephant in the room, science journalism itself. Journalism watchdog blogs have proliferated on the web, but almost all of them, even those that eschew ideology, are captive to it. As they note, anti-science beliefs held by progressives--such as clearly erroneous statements that there is no example of Democrats rejecting an entire field of science--are given a pass while stupid statements made by stupid conservatives are somehow supposed to be representative of all non-progressives. (Note: examples of Democratic rejectionism include: GM foods and crops pose a health danger; organic foods are healthier than conventional foods; fracking is an environmental disaster in the making; coal is preferable and less harmful to the environment than nuclear energy...the list goes on).

What are the book's misses? The authors take too many partisan potshots at the Obama Administration, which seems no worse (and even marginally better) than the prior Republican Administration in dealing with politically prickly hot button science issues. To a science-obsessed observer (me), one couldn't help but think that when the Bush Administration got things right, it wasn't so much that they were honing true to science but that their laissez faire attitude happened to coincide with good science. Berezow and Campbell also wander afield when it comes to analyzing science education policy, where they know the statistics but genuinely seem out of their depth on how education works.

But those are relatively modest exceptions that underscore the rule of their book: writing about complex science issues is damn difficult, and the only defense we have against ideological arrogance is transparency. These guys lay it all out there for the reader. They are fair and funny. I would challenge anyone who is genuinely open minded and has a scientific sensibility to read this book and not come away more enlightened--and saddended by the harsh politicization of science by those who arrogantly call themselves "progressives".
Was this review helpful to you?
33 of 41 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Great Debut by Berezow and Campbell October 13, 2012
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
I recently finished Alex Berezow and Hank Campbell's "Science Left Behind" and find it remarkable that as of the posting of this review, 85% of the reviews rate this book as either 5 stars or 1 star. Only two people who've read it find it to be somewhere between "great" and "terrible"? No wonder it's difficult for conservatives and liberals/progressives to have meaningful conversation about the improtance of science when it's just easier to use as a weapon against the other.

Overall, I think the story Berezow and Campbell tell is an important one that needs to be told and is done in an eloquent and entertaining way. Conservatives are frequently chided for taking "anti-science" views that seem as often to be a balancing of other factors/considerations above the opinions of scientists rather than a carte blanche rejection of science itself. Berezow and Campbell do a great job of pointing out that progressives/liberals do exactly the same thing. That said, I take issue with their definition of "anti-science" and think their better case is that the term "anti-science" (as used) applies across the board and one side should not cast it so promiscuous on the other. If everybody is anti-science does it really even mean anything? Science is a tremendously useful tool, but not all tools are sufficient for all tasks. Respect for science and its capabilites should be maintained but we should not denigrate other considerations in a way that makes science the only legitimate consideration. That said, I think they start an important conversation and effectively make the case that being "anti-science" is not as one sided as seems to be prevailing opinion.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
I should send one to each of my Progressive friends. I told people about the number of times you have to use a cloth grocery bag to make up for the disconued use of plastic bags. They were stunned...and said they would think more carefully about managing the cloth bags they had taken. This book makes you think.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Couldn't put it down...
.. and I plan to reread it! It's a book I am recommending to my friends and family from both sides of the aisle!
Published 18 days ago by EveNew
5.0 out of 5 stars Science Left Behind
This is a very interesting and enlightening book. It is well written. Ideas are logically developed with enough facts and numbers to verify validity but not so many as to become... Read more
Published 20 days ago by Vivian Partin
1.0 out of 5 stars science left behind
The authors make a believable case that certain elements in society refuse to accept genetically modified foods such as Bt corn, Atlantic salmon; or hormone injected beef; or the... Read more
Published 23 days ago by Myron D. Brockman
5.0 out of 5 stars Easy to read
I liked it a lot. Easy to read, but the authors were very convincing. Science should not be political and people from the left and the right can embrace the same true science if... Read more
Published 1 month ago by H Gary Corless
1.0 out of 5 stars Overly Simplistic -
I was most interested in this book for its chapter on education - a topic that 'progressives' have exploited for decades to wheedle more and more money out of taxpayers. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Loyd E. Eskildson
2.0 out of 5 stars Alex and Hank are guilty too
I would have given the book five stars. This is an important book and shows well how anti-science exists on both the left and the right. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Dan in Maryland
5.0 out of 5 stars makes you think
Things you misunderstood and didn't know you didn't know. Made me think about progressive science and realize it isn't science.
Published 2 months ago by MARK RAUCH
5.0 out of 5 stars Spot on
Don't pay attention to the 1 star reviews from liberals. If you notice only one of them have a 'verified purchase' tag. Read more
Published 2 months ago by T. John
3.0 out of 5 stars Now we need to get science right
It is no news that there are as many science-deniers on the Left as on the Right; and that the liberal media are far more likely to support Democrats than Republicans. Read more
Published 3 months ago by Interested customer
4.0 out of 5 stars Leveling the Playing Field
There should be a lot more books like this if only to offset the one sided smear of the left that only the right has proposed unscientific positions. Read more
Published 4 months ago by Constantine
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category