Amazon.com: Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense: Approaching Environmental Literacy (9780801857744): Dean Michael Zimmerman: Books

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense: Approaching Environmental Literacy
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense: Approaching Environmental Literacy [Paperback]

Dean Michael Zimmerman (Author)
1.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

September 16, 1997

A pesticide banned in the United States is sold instead to farmers overseas; their products are then exported to American supermarkets. How do you know your fruits and vegetables are safe from contamination?

. A mining company buys government land in Colorado at $5 an acre for possible mineral exploration, then sells it to a developer at $50,000 an acre for condominiums. Such procedures are both legal and increasingly widespread. Can a better-informed public stop them?

. Attempting to calm public fears about the safety of chemically treated fruits, a government official eats a treated apple at a televised press conference. How does the risk he takes compare--statistically--with yours and your children's?

As the role of science and technology in everyday life grows both more pervasive and more complex, it has become ever more difficult for a scientifically "illiterate" public to make informed judgments. In Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense, Michael Zimmerman takes on a wide range of falsifiers, disinformation specialists, and charlatans to provide readers with the scientific background necessary to evaluate environmental and other current issues that increasingly may be a matter of life and death.

Zimmerman begins by showing just what science is--and how the criteria of skepticism and falsifiability distinguish it from pseudo-science and mysticism. He offers intelligent, entertaining, and sometimes scathing analyses of bad science--from lottery "systems" and creationism to graphologists and homeopaths, from food and product safety scams to outright scientific fraud. In each case he shows exactly what to watch for--how the most outrageously false claims often contain a grain of truth, and how valid scientific findings may be distorted or selectively quoted to serve the ends of government, business, or special interest groups.

The author of a syndicated newspaper column on scientific and environmental issues, Michael Zimmerman has been hailed by supporters in environmental groups and sharply criticized by his opponents. Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense is sure to provoke both controversy and debate.

"Increasingly large portions of the American public are scientifically illiterate. By this I mean not that many people are unaware of specific scientific 'facts,' although there can be no doubt that they are. Rather, in pointing to scientific illiteracy I mean something far more rudimentary: an inability to differentiate science from pseudoscience. Science, based on skepticism and dependent on both falsifiability and experimentation, is dramatically different from pseudoscience, based on faith and dependent on gullibility. While pseudoscience can surely be entertaining, whether it be matching astrological signs with a date or playing paranormal parlor games, the situation becomes very different when the inability to distinguish between the two means that important decisions are made on the basis of superstitious drivel.--Michael Zimmerman, in Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense


Editorial Reviews

Review

""Zimmerman argues that Americans are so ignorant of basic scientific principles that they are easy prey for 'cynical disinformation campaigns'... He shows that you don't need a Ph.D. to avoid being deceived; you just need to combine the skepticism of a scientist with the common sense of an informed and intelligent citizen." -- Philadelphia Inquirer



""The book merits a wide readership among people who are concerned about the vaildity and integrety of scientific opinion in government, education, and among the general public. In political debate, many people appear to have difficulty knowing who or what to believe and why. This book could help readers understand that science is not merely a collection of facts and theories but rather a way of reasoning, and ability to appreciate the weight of evidence, and a means of separating the demonstrably false from the probably true." -- Environment



""In a highly readable and comprehensive fashion, the text succeeds in warning readers of the dangers of scientific illiteracy, in demonstrating the process of critical inquiry and in introducing a range of environmental issues in light of the larger discussion of the nature of scientific thought; it debunks the 'myth of the technological fix,' and it reveals the role of creativity, wonder, and a sense of responsibility in the scientific analysis of our environmental problems." -- American Scientist



""Zimmerman's mission is to promote scientific literacy, and so enable us to make decisions not based on 'superstitious drivel'... [He] makes the point well that scientific literacy is essential if ordinary citizens are to take part in decisions that affect their lives." -- New Scientist



""Zimmerman's account of [the battle between creationists and Darwinian evolutionists] is fascinating and at times frightening." -- Nature

Book Description

Debunks a wide range of falsifiers, disinformation specialists, and charlatans involved with environmental and other current issues that increasingly may be a matter of life and death.


Product Details

  • Paperback: 232 pages
  • Publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press (September 16, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801857740
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801857744
  • Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 0.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 1.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,164,078 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
1.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Mommy, are we there yet?, October 29, 2004
By 
Jamie Alexander (Philadelphia PA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
We may be approaching environmental literacy, but no, we are not there yet. I was disappointed in this book, which I choose to read because of the intriguing title. I was hoping for an analysis of the broad field of environmentalism with an attempt to distinguish threads of science, nonscience and nonsense within it. That is not what the book is.

Clearly written and heartfelt, though not impassioned, the book is yet another wakeup-call to society to do something about environmental devastation. The author's solution is public science education (he is a science teacher) and his outlook is optimistic. Zimmerman's appeal is personal and personable, not dry and academic, but it lacks punch. To those who read in the environmental literature, there is nothing new here, however it would make a very good introduction for the uninitiate, which, I suppose, is it's purpose.

The first four chapters of the book are a brief look at the differences between general science and pseudo-science, in the vain of Sagan's "The Demon-Haunted World." Sagan's book is much more compelling and comprehensive. Zimmerman tries to relate those first four chapters to the environmental theme, but doesn't fully succeed. The logic is there, but the execution is weak. All in all, a fine introduction to current environmental issues (consider the chapters on general science a bonus), and a good addition to a comprehensive collection, but not a unique or groundbreaking effort.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


20 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Preaching to the choir, December 10, 2000
By 
Scott White (Ontario, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense: Approaching Environmental Literacy (Paperback)
The book presents itself as an objective, science-oriented view of environmental issues. The first few chapters, which are the only ones directly related to the title, review the differences between science, nonscience, and nonsense. These are well worth the time. The remainder of the book begins from the presumption that environmental advocacy -is- science, and that political opposition, couched as science, is either nonscience or nonsense. While often true, Zimmerman ignores or glosses over legitimate questions that would be raised by any educated political opponent throughout his overview of environmental issues and generally presents only one side. Zimmernam also ignores the nonsense and nonscience on the environmental advocacy side so often presented as scientific reality. If you are an environmentalist uninterested in other points of view, you'll love it. If you are an anti-environmentalist, you'll find it infuriating and not at all educational. If you are the least bit objective in your views, you'll be disappointed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 51 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't even bother, September 14, 2009
This review is from: Science, Nonscience, and Nonsense: Approaching Environmental Literacy (Paperback)
I was assigned this book for the worst class I've ever taken in my college career. This book had a lot to do with why it was so bad. He has a serious political agenda he's forcing down your throat and calls it "science". I've never read anything worse in my life.... Some idiot gets a PHD from a half a** school and thinks he's better than everyone, and has the final say-so. I guess that's who actually sits down to write this kind of crap.

All in all- I'd rather put my head in a microwave than read his crap ever again. I was forced to read it for a class and needed an A, but if I were to have read it voluntarily, I would have stopped by the first page.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject