23 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good overview, September 16, 2001
This review is from: Science and Religion: An Introduction (Paperback)
Most books on science and religion are either anti-religion (wanting to throw out historic Christianity) or anti-science (wanting to throw out the evidence for evolution, the age of the earth and the universe, etc.).
This one is neither, and that's what makes it a good book. McGrath has a virtue that is somewhat uncommon among conservative religious writers, and that is his profound respect for people and opinions with which he disagrees. Thus, he gives a fair presentation of ideas other than his own.
I'm amused that another reviewer thought McGrath was too critical of fundamentalists. Other critics think McGrath *is* a fundamentalist!
But to clear the air a little, McGrath uses the word "fundamentalist" to describe, not merely conservative doctrines, but a particular sociology that involves eagerness to be separate from everyone with whom one disagrees even slightly. McGrath is conservative but not, in that sense, fundamentalist.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent introduction to the science/religion debate, October 22, 2004
This review is from: Science and Religion: An Introduction (Paperback)
Alister Mcgrath has the remarkable gift of taking complex ideas and putting them on the lower shelf for the novice to handle. Like his Studies in Doctrine, McGrath has done the same here in framing the debate between faith and scientific reasoning with accessible prose. This is particularly recommended for those who sense the conflict between science and religion within the popular culture but who know that the God of the Bible is the same as the God of Creation. Thankfully, McGrath presents the issues for the non-specialist with breadth and fairness. As a trained molecular biologist and historical theologian, McGrath is perfectly suited to present this material.
For the Christian, the central issue is the question of whether or not empirical, scientific data can ever justify a move away from a long-held, literal interpretation of the text. Copernicus and Galileo, far from suggesting that humanity was somehow no longer the center of God's attention in the universe, were instead showing that a more figurative or allegorical interpretation was required concerning geocentric biblical texts. Is God really telling us literally that the "sun rises" or is this simply divine accomodation to the limitations of authors in the biblical period who were not familiar with the insights of modern science?
McGrath's historical survey is the best part of the book. He covers every major issue including Newton's mechanistic universe, Descartes' mathematical idealism, Darwin's quest for biological uniformitarianism, and Michael Polyani's postmodern understanding of personal commitment in scientific endeavor. McGrath convincingly shows that philosophy is just as important to science as it is to theology. He also includes a helpful critical section of Lynn White's influential essay concerning Christianity's role in the modern ecological crisis.
McGrath offers a summary of various approaches to finding harmony between science and religion. For example, the complementarity we find between the paradoxical joining of the divine and human natures in Jesus Christ can give us insight into the paradoxical joining of wave theory and particle theory in explaining the characteristics of light.
McGrath finishes his work by examining some particular issues by detailing useful biographical material, from Charles Darwin to Thomas Torrance. Regarding Torrance, it is quite easy to tell that McGrath tends to follow Torrance's "critical realism" as providing the most adequate solution to the tension between science and religion (McGrath fully develops his own ideas in a separate three-volume series, "Nature", "Theory" and "Reality").
The only reason I can not give five stars to this book is because McGrath fails to provide adequate footnotes for the material he quotes. Thankfully, he does provide an excellent biography at the end of every chapter for further study, but it is really frustrating when you want to research a quote and you simply do not know where to look.
As an aside, the only other limitation is the McGrath does not really address any non-Christian religious perspectives. On the other hand, history shows that the science/religion debate has had the most impact on Christianity, so it is not surprising to be so focused on the Christian dilemma.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent, June 16, 2000
This review is from: Science and Religion: An Introduction (Paperback)
Alister McGrath has written an excellent book providing background information for anyone seeking to understand the relationship between science and religion. The book is valuable because McGrath provides historical background to the issue as well as discussing some issues topically. He then provides "case studies" as well as brief discussion of particular authors who are important in this field such as Barbour, de Chardin and Panenberg.
I do have some small criticisms. First, McGrath's discussion of Fundamentalism seems somewhat unfair and focuses on the worst parts of the movement. Second, some of the bigrpahical studies are a little too short (probably inevitable in a survey work). Third, McGrath only mentions the work of Stanley Jaki once. I think Jaki deserved a separate section, along with other prominent writers on the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
