Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
I will buy any book with VCA name on it, and that's a habit I guess I'll have to live with., October 31, 2007
This book was bad. Really bad. And this is coming from a woman who can find the good in just about anything. I don't even know where to start or what to say to convey just how terrible a read this was. I've never enjoyed the ghostwriter's books as much as I did VC Andrews, herself. However, once in a blue moon he does manage to write a book or two that I can get through while managing to keep my lunch down at the same time. Keep in mind this is only once... in a blue moon.
I don't know if the main character was meant to be likeable, relatable or believeable, but she was none of the above. What the author tried to pass off as a teenager who is insanely dedicated to her friendship only came off as a teenger who is insanely STUPID. There were some points in the book that, in the middle of reading, I could become infuriated at Zipporah to the point that I would scream, out loud, "Are you KIDDING me?" I mean, the girl is seriously, seriously stupid. I didn't trust Karen from the moment she appeared in the attic, but I do have to agree with the term that she used all too frequently throughout this book, "Don't be thick."
The main character of this book is just that: thick. And if I never hear the term "don't be thick", again, it'll be too soon.
VC Andrews, if you can hear me, I'm terribly sorry that this garbage is being published under your name. Terribly, terribly sorry.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
It pretty much sucks! (spoilers), April 6, 2008
It started out interesting. I couldn't put it down at first. But it just got silly. I found Zipporah to be a daft, weak main character that just never comes to life at all.
I felt like there was all this build up and the mystery would be solved but it just turned out Karen was crazy?! Ridiculous.
The ending was highly disappointing. I couldn't believe it!
I felt puzzled and like it was unfinished. Loose ends weren't tied up.
I believe the ghostwriter is getting lazy. He's not sticking to the old formula and the books are suffering.
This was the worst book I've read that has the misfortune of having the wonderful V.C.'s name on it.
I really loved the Landry series, the Cutler series, The Logan series, the Hudson series, even the DeBeers books. I love a lot of what the ghostwriter HAS done.
It just seems that his best days are behind him.
It's all crap these days.
Maybe it's time to lay V.C. to rest once and for all.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
worst ever, November 4, 2007
I love V.C. Andrews, but this book was just the worst. The ghostwriter did absolutely no justice to her. By the second page I knew I wasn't reading her work. The plot itself was good, but the details given to bring it to life were few and far between. The writer did nothing to help you understand where the Karen character was coming from when it was finally revealed she was nothing but a sociopath. The ending was so abrupt I had to check to make sure I didn't skip any pages. What really got to me were all the inconsistencies in the story. Timelines did not unfold correctly; most notably the fact that the family was to take a trip on a saturday when, the tuesday before, the murder happens and by thursday the dad says he should call his mother to explain why they didn't make it on saturday, saturday hadn't even come and gone yet. Whoever proofread the book ought to be fired along with the ghostwriter. I was very dissappointed in this book, and am not sure I even want to read the next in this series.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|