1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A dense but fascinating book, January 9, 2007
This review is from: The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Canto original series) (Paperback)
Owen Chadwick's work examines the meaning and processes of secularization in European society. Chadwick makes some illuminating insights into the various dimensions of secularization. His style, however, is somewhat convoluted and confusing. It requires close reading to extract the important theses in this book.
Chadwick divides his work into two sections corresponding to the two dimensions of secularization--the social and the intellectual. In each section Chadwick makes important contributions to understanding various figures and movements--Marx, Voltaire, August Comte, anticlericalism and critical historiography, to name just a few. Among his most important theses, he postulates that nationalism was a far greater force for secularization than, for example, science. This was certainly true in Italy, where the papacy was a great obstacle to unification of that country.
Chadwick summarizes that the most palpable effect of secularization is not necessarily a shift in intellectual thinking, or even in social action, but in a loss of "providence." After the various advances in natural science, critical historiography, and moral philosophy, the average person no longer felt the strong presence of God in the world. There was no longer the sense that God "counted the hairs on every person's head." This effect was the most important of the secularization of Europe in the nineteenth century, more so than any overt changes in the intellectual or political life of Europe.
This book is dense, as Chadwick intertwines his various theses and examinations of figures in a complex narrative. His prose is poetic and flowing, but he is not interested in merely in laying out facts. He often presumes knowledge of persons and events without any exposition, and dives straight into his penetrating analysis. It takes patience and some background knowledge to fully understand this book, but it is well worth the effort.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Dense, Academic Work that is not Easily Accessible, March 27, 2009
This review is from: The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Canto original series) (Paperback)
I read this book for a church history class in seminary. The six students all had negative reactions to reading it not because of the subject or thesis but due to the writing style of Chadwick. We all found it to be written in an inaccessible style that proved difficult to read and follow. Despite that shared sentiment, the book offers some valuable insights that reward readers who trudge through it.
Chadwick is undoubtedly a master of the data touched on in this book. He assumes a sophisticated knowledge of the subject among his readers. He makes many unexplained references to people, places and events. He meanders through history, culture, politics and trends. At first glance, the writing seems unorganized and off-track; however, he seems to approach a subject from all angles as he makes his points.
Each chapter seems to stand alone. Some are more direct than others. Chadwick paints liberalism as an ideal presented by rational thinkers hoping to initiate a society of responsible social living in which all individuals shared the opportunity for liberty within a moral and just system. Society should be programmed to promote and foster individuality in behavior and expression. He asserts that Christian conscience was the initial force that began to make Europe "secular" by invoking the liberty and tolerance in society that would allow people to worship according to their consciences without fear of impeachment. Liberal thinkers believed people needed "far more room to act and think than they were allowed by established laws and conventions in European society." (22)
Liberal theology was emboldened by the emphasis on the mind which among liberals led to an equation of religion with philosophy rather than something unique and supernatural. Chadwick suggests that once religion was considered as an intellectual field rather than otherworldly, it became subject to skeptics. As science gained the spotlight through scientists like Darwin, religion was then subjected to the methods of the scientists who based truth on evidence and on what could be proven.
Chadwick discusses the scientists Vogt who in the mid-nineteenth century taught that science had disproved religion. Others like Buchner taught that since science and Darwin had disproved God they have also proven that the universe has no purpose and religious people were deceived and deceivers.
Chadwick devotes a chapter to Marx that is probably the most comprehensible chapter and offers a somewhat sympathetic perspective of Marx. The discussion of Marx' thoughts on religion and human needs is interesting and enlightening.
Chadwick shows that the problem with the liberal-rationalist-Marx view is that religion did not go away. The people did not reject God or faith. As Chadwick asserts, Christianity contains a gospel of hope for humans that is built not upon reason or experience but upon teaching received as revelation. He writes that on justification by faith "was founded the redemption of man, an optimism that, despite chains which bound him to hell, God could raise him up, to mount towards heaven as the eagles fly, to run and not be weary." (36) Liberalism which was based on principles of toleration and liberty was faced with the challenge to tolerate the church or turn against itself.
Chadwick shows how liberalism is constantly challenged by reality itself. Liberalism, by its nature, must allow men the liberty to determine the truths behind the universe and humanity. I think it was this conflict between sentimentalism and reality, provable or unprovable, natural or supernatural, that characterizes the theology of this period as theologians, philosophers, and scientists all tried to define what constituted truth.
Chadwick points out that during this period it was in vogue among secularists not to discover the truth but to criticize what was commonly held to be true. This included the criticism of the historicity of the Biblical narrative, including the life of Jesus portrayed in the gospels. Renan characterizes the age with his writing of the non-supernatural life of Jesus. Jesus becomes the ideal man, someone any person could admire and seek to imitate. Jesus is humanity, and so rather than a God being worshipped, humanity itself is worshipped and glorified. Human progress through science and thought will take responsibility for progress and advancement.
Craig Stephans, author of Shakespeare On Spirituality: Life-Changing Wisdom from Shakespeare's Plays
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No