Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not Seeing Vietnam, October 19, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: Seeing Vietnam: Encounters of the Road and Heart (Paperback)
This is one of the worst travel accounts of Vietnam I've ever read. The author's insensitivity is shown through her writing, which has an unfeeling tone of detached sarcasm and condescension. For an example, and there are too many to quote, of her visit to China Beach she writes:"I descend a few steps to the beach, chased by a pack of urchins hawking peanut candy. On a clear day maybe the emerald waters and distant mountains really do rival Waikiki. I've got grey pounding surf and a scene out of Tennessee Williams' Suddenly, Last Summer. (How did she die? Oh, didn't you hear? She was devoured by urchins at China Beach.)" When she shows emotion or a hint of compassionate understanding, it is too often out of place and affected. For example,when asked if she likes Hanoi by a girl who acts as a translator to a group of woman tai chi practitioners, she replies: " 'Tell them I like Hanoi very much. Hanoi is a beautiful city, with beautiful parks. Tell them--' What was it I wanted to tell them? 'Tell them . . . ' Oh Jesus,god. 'Tell them I'm very sorry for what my country did to your country.' And I burst into tears." Of Hue's restoration efforts aided by UNESCO, she writes: "Hue deserves all the international aid it can get, and it seems heartless to quarrel with UNESCO's well-meaning gesture, but the restoration struck me as a great waste of money in the context of Vietnam's human needs." A few sentences later she writes: "I happen to love ruins. I can spend days ruminating happily among ancient stones and glyphs, trying to comprehend the mysteries of lost civilizations, but the more I was of Hue's nineteenth century ruins, the less impressive I found them. They simply weren't old enough to inspire flights of fancy or admiration." Is she implying that we should allow what remains of old Hue to crumble with time so that some day its state of ruin will match its antiquity as a city? And only should we then put money into restoration, which all ruins (that she loves so much)around the world have required? With the same affected "humanism",she writes: "They [the tombs of Hue] make me unhappy, Tra. All this ostentatious display of wealth that was robbed from the people." She is all too eager to share with the American public her recently-acquired enlightening knowledge of Vietnam's history and culture, for more than half of her writing consists of tidbits of historical facts and trivia that sound as if they were picked out of travel guides. Contrary to her intention of using these "insightful" tidbits of background information to help the public better understand Vietnam, they only serve to distance the reader, who is left with no better an insightful picture of Vietnam than if he/she were to read a travel guide, which nonetheless is more pragmatically useful. The title is deceiving, for there is nothing in the book emotionally expressive of "Seeing Vietnam through Encounters of the Road and Heart." The author could have written this book without leaving the comforts of New York, for she had already had preconceptions of the country before arriving. The book only confirms her entrenched views,cultural insensitivities and generalizations.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
1992 Vietnam revisited by a war correspondent., May 27, 2011
This review is from: Seeing Vietnam: Encounters of the Road and Heart (Paperback)
Seeing Vietnam is a trip from the top to the bottom of the now reunified nation in 1992 by Susan Brownmiller, a war correspondent in the 60's She starts in Hanoi, then to Danang, on to Hue, Saigon then the Mekong Delta with her Vietnamese guides and her photographer. Brownmiller arrives in Vietnam with a somewhat blase attitude. Her commentary is somewhat blah and seems to highlight the poverty in a "hmm, these guys won?" type overtone. As she moves through the country, however, her tone seems to change to a more accepting understanding that this way of life is viable and sustainable as it's not too reliant on "stuff". I grew to like her, she's witty, smart and has a sarcastic element to her that I find attractive. The banter between her and her guide(s) made me smile more than once. I get the feeling Brownmiller typified the average Westerner in a land deemed "underdeveloped" by western standards. The "how do these people live" eventually changes to "these people really are living". The population isn't hurrying around in a blur of goals and objectives but more concentrating on the moment. I found Saigon to be the most interesting of her chapters as, there is so much history for the westerner there. She talks about the Diem regime, the Buddhist monk immolation's of the 60's, the various coups and temporary governments that came and went with the seasons. She has done her homework. She gives us a lot of history which, I'm very grateful for. She describes the scenery and explains it's place in the French, Japanese and American wars. She recounts the places she visits during the American war, Danang, where the marines came ashore in 1965, Hue the longest holdout by the Vietcong in the Tet offensive etc It's fascinating stuff and, if you have any interest in Vietnam whatsoever, well worth your time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not Seeing Vietnam..., October 19, 1998
By A Customer
This is one of the worst travel accounts of Vietnam I've ever read. The author's insensitivity is shown through her writing, which has an unfeeling tone of detached sarcasm and condescension. For an example, and there are too many to quote, of her visit to China Beach she writes: "I descend a few steps to the beach, chased by a pack of urchins hawking peanut candy. On a clear day maybe the emerald waters and distant mountains really do rival Waikiki. I've got grey pounding surf and a scene out of Tennessee Williams' Suddenly, Last Summer. (How did she die? Oh, didn't you hear? She was devoured by urchins at China Beach.)" When she shows emotion or a hint of compassionate understanding, it is too often out of place and affected. For example, when asked if she likes Hanoi by a girl who acts as a translator to a group of woman tai chi practitioners, she replies: " 'Tell them I like Hanoi very much. Hanoi is a beautiful city, with beautiful parks. Tell them--' What was it I wanted to tell them? 'Tell them . . . ' Oh Jesus, god. 'Tell them I'm very sorry for what my country did to your country.' And I burst into tears." Of Hue's restoration efforts aided by UNESCO, she writes: "Hue deserves all the international aid it can get, and it seems heartless to quarrel with UNESCO's well-meaning gesture, but the restoration struck me as a great waste of money in the context of Vietnam's human needs." A few sentences later she writes: "I happen to love ruins. I can spend days ruminating happily among ancient stones and glyphs, trying to comprehend the mysteries of lost civilizations, but the more I was of Hue's nineteenth century ruins, the less impressive I found them. They simply weren't old enough to inspire flights of fancy or admiration." Is she implying that we should allow what remains of old Hue to crumble with time so that some day its state of ruin will match its antiquity as a city? And only should we then put money into restoration, which all ruins (that she loves so much) around the world have required? With the same affected "humanism", she writes: "They [the tombs of Hue] make me unhappy, Tra. All this ostentatious display of wealth that was robbed from the people." She is all too eager to share with the American public her recently-acquired enlightening knowledge of Vietnam's history and culture, for more than half of her writing consists of tidbits of historical facts and trivia that sound as if they were picked out of travel guides. Contrary to her intention of using these "insightful" tidbits of background information to help the public better understand Vietnam, they only serve to distance the reader, who is left with no better an insightful picture of Vietnam than if he/she were to read a travel guide, which nonetheless is more pragmatically useful. The title is deceiving, for there is nothing in the book emotionally expressive of "Seeing Vietnam through Encounters of the Road and Heart." The author could have written this book without leaving the comforts of New York, for she had already had preconceptions of the country before arriving. The book only confirms her entrenched views,cultural insensitivities and generalizations.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|