Customer Reviews

Seiko Men's SHC033 Dive Watch

5 star:		(6)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Seiko Diver's have a long history of being rugged, dependable watches. I bought my first 200m Diver's in 1988, wore it for ten years, and gave it to my brother, who is still wearing it today. While in the Marine Corps, I repeatedly exposed this watch to harsh conditions--sea water, oil, hydraulic fluid, mud--and it weathered them all. You really can't ask for much more than that from a watch.

I bought my second 200m Diver's a couple of years ago and have been as happy with it as I was with the first one. This is an excellent, rugged, moderately priced watch that's particularly well-suited for marine and outdoor sports.

I own one of these and I can just say, it is a very solid watch. The look and feel is very good. Accuracy has been excellent. All-around good watch. I am not sure where the "battery life indicator" is, unless it is that blue sticker on the back, but not reall sure about that.

I am fully satisfied with the quality, accuracy and ruggedness of this Seiko Dive watch--it's one of the best on the market and easy to maintain. Good illumination of face details at night.

This is a great dive watch. The dials are very easy to see in low light and they keep their glow all night. Its a very simple watch just date and time, but you can tell its a well made piece of craftsmenship. I've looked around a lot and amazon has the best price I have seen.

I actually own a 27 year old version of this watch which has served me loyally all these years. I don't remember changing batteries more than a few times.

I decided to treat myself to a new version of this watch. The only noticeable difference is that the face says "200 meters" and not "150 meters" like my older watch.

Interesting is that purchased from Amazon, this new watch cost me more than $120 less than I paid for my older watch in 1980.

Great watch--rugged and extremely accurate.

This is simply a great watch. Solid, very dependable, and accurate. Actually, I now have two of these. The first I bought in 2002, but that one has a slightly different ring around the dial. In any event, it's still working great after all that time, having needed only a battery change a few months ago. I recently bought the newer version with red and blue on the dial ring. No complaints so far.