14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Rhetoric of Attacking "Free Market Rhetoric", December 14, 2003
This review is from: Selling the Free Market: The Rhetoric of Economic Correctness (Hardcover)
I must confess that I checked out this book from a library only to skim it for a few quotes to cite in a paper I was writing. I wound up spending an entire day reading the book cover to cover. For this reason alone, I recommend it, although I disagree completely with its central thesis.
Aune is a very rare commodity among leftist anti-capitalists: he is well versed in the writings of free-market proponents. Additionally, he is a very good writer, and Selling the Free Market is well written. His summaries of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as well as some of the writings of Nozick, Rothbard, Murray, etc. are as clear as any I've read.
Aune is simply wrong on a few points that are not important to the overall discussion, however. For example, he claims that free market reforms have been "remarkably unsuccessful," pointing to slow economic growth and increasing income inequality (p. 1). Of course many sources reveal that this analysis is just plain incorrect. Read Norberg's In Defense of Global Capitalism (2003) or Sowell's Basic Economics (2000), for example.
Also, Aune attacks Charles Murray's claim that the Civil Rights Acts were unnecessary because (as Murray states) socio/economic progress for racial minorities would have occured in the free market anyway. Aune claims that Murray "provides no proof for this assertion" (p. 114). In fact Murray's book cites trendlines that show Blacks' economic fortunes were rising even before the Civil Rights Movement (Murray 1997, p. 51).
I could go on about Aune's errors but I believe that the overall strength of Aune's book is its overview of the free market movement--such as it is a movement. Certainly, Aune's factual errors are believed and repeated by countless other so-called liberal intellectuals. I rate this book 4 stars for readability. I really do recommend it be read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Filling an important void, February 3, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Selling the Free Market: The Rhetoric of Economic Correctness (Hardcover)
Aune's book is an important and timely addition to the debates concerning American public philosophy, specifically regarding the appropriate role of government and markets in the coming global world. The work helps explain (and certainly question) the recent glorifications of markets as social cure-alls, as well as the conservative turn to the scapegoating of government after the boogey-man of communism fell away. Turning conservatism upon itself, Aune ably exposes the contradictions between and within the libertarian and cultural wings of conservatism through a focus on the writings of philosophers such as Rand, Nozick, and Murray as well as politicians such as Reagan, Buchanan, and Gingrich. I feel that through his exposition of the subtle rhetorical strategies of "economic correctness," Aune succeeded in his goal of providing his readers with the necessary equipment to counter the arguments of the free marketers. The book should clearly be read by scholars and advocates interested in rhetoric, economics, and contemporary political philosophy. In addition, due to Aune's readable style and his use of humor, the book is also accessible and worthwhile to broader audiences interested in such issues. Here is at least one reader who hopes that Aune's term "economic correctness" receives broad use in American political discourse.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Libertarians are the plague, February 21, 2001
This review is from: Selling the Free Market: The Rhetoric of Economic Correctness (Hardcover)
I see libertarians are really trashing this book. The author is no ivory tower Marxist. He has good things to say about traditional conservatives like Russell Kirk who actually believe in tradition, stable communities, and values beyond the dollar sign. It's a good read, too.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No