Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A solid biography, but not wholly satisfactory, December 17, 2008
This review is from: The Several Lives of Joseph Conrad (Hardcover)
As might be expected from a distinguished Conrad scholar -- among other things, author John Stape is co-editor of Conrad's published letters -- THE SEVERAL LIVES OF JOSEPH CONRAD is a sober, responsible biography of one of the great novelists of the 20th Century. But it is not wholly satisfactory. It certainly is not the definitive or the ideal biography of Conrad.
Noting that "biographies of late have tended to bloat" (how true!), Stape states in his Preface that his objective is "brevity." In a sense, he succeeds: THE SEVERAL LIVES OF JOSEPH CONRAD comes in at 272 pages of text. (Additional pages contain photos, maps, family trees, biographical profiles of people of note who interacted with Conrad, and extensive footnotes and bibliography -- all of which are welcome.) But the last two-thirds of the book, dealing with Conrad's career as a writer, bogs down in the details of a seemingly endless cycle of gout and depression, financial irresponsibility followed by scuffling and cadging for funds, visits with assorted literary and cultural figures, and Conrad's continuous bemoaning of the toil of the writing life. All in all, as relatively short as it is, the book is too much biographical fact and too little biographical essence.
Stape, in his Preface, also disavows any effort to pursue "literary criticism," and indeed THE SEVERAL LIVES OF JOSEPH CONRAD contains only the barest and briefest discussion of the literary aspects of Conrad's works. That is unfortunate because what little Stape does offer in the way of literary analysis is worthwhile. For example: "Although incontestably a great writer, having contributed to shaping the way his own and the generations after him 'see', [Conrad] is, perhaps, in the scheme of things, not quite a 'great' novelist, missing -- just -- the glacial perfection, of a Stendhal or Flaubert, and in this perhaps more closely resembling the achievement of a Tolstoy or Dostoevsky."
On the plus side, THE SEVERAL LIVES OF JOSEPH CONRAD is tolerably well-written and I believe one can trust what it says about the facts of Conrad's life. On balance, I prefer it slightly over the one other biography I have read of Conrad, "Joseph Conrad" by Jeffrey Meyers. But, as noted, it is not a fully satisfactory biography. To be sure, Conrad -- to indulge in a gross understatement -- was an exceedingly complex person. And his fiction reflects again and again his dismissal as futile and delusory any effort to fully comprehend any human being, even oneself. Perhaps, then, it is too much to expect any biographer to fully capture the essence of Joseph Conrad. Still, knowledgeable Conrad scholar that Stape undoubtedly is, he is not supremely skilled in the art and craft of biography. So I maintain hope that some day we will get a thoroughly responsible biography of Joseph Conrad that, if not definitive or ideal, does bring us much closer to this elusive, and great, writer.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Homo multiplex, January 6, 2009
This review is from: The Several Lives of Joseph Conrad (Hardcover)
This is definitively not the definitive Conrad biography.
For one, Stape explicitely focuses on the life, or 'several lives', and nearly ignores the work, usually just mentioning titles and extremely briefly what they were about and how they fared in the market place.
Second, there are still so many gaps in the life story. That seems to be largely due to the fact that the man moved about a lot and much documentation got lost. This problem gets more and more difficult to solve with time.
Which 'several lives' are we looking at?
The Catholic- Polish 'gentleman' (not quite aristocrat), who never lived in Poland (because that country was not a political entity at his time; rather, born in the Ukraine in the Russian empire, then moved to the Polish part of the Austrian/Hungarian empire); not a good Catholic either, Conrad never was a religious man, God bless him.
Then seaman in France and England, travelling the world, but not quite making a success out of his chosen career.
Then, out of nowhere, he becomes a writer in his third language, quits the sea, becomes a family man and a literary professional with literary friends. Conrad produces a string of masterpieces, but never has enough money and never seems to be able to handle money well when he has some.
Then a good English patriot with proper anti-Russian, anti-German, and also anti-American sentiments. Not anti-French, that he couldn't do.
In his last years financial sanity, but dwindling artistic power, and terrible health trouble, as well as great sorrows with a failing son.
Many of his books were praised by the critics, but ignored by the public. In his own words:his books dropped into the past like stones in water. Henry James, a friendly colleague, said: being serious and subtle isn't one of the paths to fortune. Many of Conrad's books achieved lasting fame in later times. The man was too modern for his world.
I had read most of Conrad's books in the 70s and 80s and am now re-visiting him. I realize that I underestimated him in the past. I saw him as some kind of older Graham Greene. I did not realize the full extent of his importance. And I had some struggles with his language, which I found often unnecessarily compact and slow. I realize now that was largely my own fault.
Stape's biography is useful, but too much is missing, and not all in it is necessary. It gets a little repetitious with all the gout attacks and the wife's knee operations and Walpole coming for lunch etc etc.
Most bios of writers have the habit of placing the target in a social context of other writers. That is also one of the strong sides of Stape's book too. I never knew that Conrad was close to Stephen Crane; SC died while JC was writing the ending of Lord Jim. The death may have influenced the tone of the book. What I find a little irritating is Stape's habit of hinting vaguely at Conrad's friendships with younger men, somehow not quite saying that he suspects an underlying unspoken motive. (The Melville bio that I read recently did the same, ie hint at hidden homosexual streaks in the pattern of the man.)
Other friends and good colleagues: Galsworthy, Henry James, H.G.Wells, Ford Maddox Ford (the target of much scorn from Stape), Hugh Walpole, J.M.Barrie, Hardy, Russell, Gide... It seems Conrad was seriously hoping for the Nobel, and he was a giant in his world.
As we know, he wasn't the only giant who was not en-Nobled by Stockholm. A smaller move from Britain's royalty was rejected by him, in line with his some of his peers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The many lives of the same fascinating man, March 12, 2008
This review is from: The Several Lives of Joseph Conrad (Hardcover)
When you hear Lord Jim, Heart of Darkness, or The Secret Agent, does "Joseph Conrad" come to mind? Reading about Conrad's jinxed life turned those books more intimate and all the more tragic.
John Stape opens his Conrad biography with notes and appendices as you into Conrad's life. Without these pieces, any Conrad non-professional would most likely be lost, as Conrad's world was so vastly different from anything imaginable.
Born to Polish parents, he was exiled to northern Russia before he could read. His father, a Polish Revolutionary, was forced to flee after defying the Tzar. His mother had died in Siberia when he was 7; then at 11 he became an official orphan. At 16 he moved to France and then moved onto England, where he became a sailor with the Merchant Marines. This job fuelled his writing power, though he led such a brilliant life in solitude.
Conrad quickly married working-class, Jessie. As with the sailing voyages, his fragile marriage also gave birth to plots and the passion put into his earlier short stories. Fears that his wife may leave him should he become delusional was one main plot, and in another a wife killed her husband due to his sexual advances-which he wrote on his honeymoon.
Conrad who seemed to attract bad luck. As he was finishing a lengthy novel, a tipped oil lamp destroyed the manuscript, as another was being shipped on the Titanic. Enough said. Misfortune and scarring events gave him material to write fictional portrayals of his own experiences. On a voyage through the Belgian Congo, he produced Heart of Darkness, even though his health and morale were shattered by the experience.
Stape writes an eloquent portrait of Conrad's life. Overall, the book was so intensely in tune with what one could imagine Conrad's experiences to be, that I had to balance out the depressing read with something lighthearted.
Clearly Stape is a Conrad expert. Despite the absence of good fortune during Conrad's life, the literary community was blessed with a writer no less than a genius.
Armchair Interviews says: If you love biographies that paint vivid and realistic pictures of a famous writer, this is for you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
